Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for 神膠官方頻道🚯

Channel

神膠官方頻道🚯

@GodKnowYouNews

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

1,480subscribers

-3 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002577325974
TypeChannel
Username@GodKnowYouNews
CreatedBetween 1 March 2025 and 31 July 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live15 August 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 15 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/GodKnowYouNews

Growth

1,4801,4831,481.56 August 2026 — 1,483 subscribers6 August 2026 — 1,483 subscribers9 August 2026 — 1,482 subscribers15 August 2026 — 1,480 subscribers6 August 202615 August 2026
4 measurements spanning 10 days, net -3. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,480–1,483 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
15 Aug 2026, 18:331,480-2
9 Aug 2026, 10:011,482-1
6 Aug 2026, 07:461,483no change
6 Aug 2026, 04:471,483first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 13 March 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 15 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

183 reactions across 20 posts, in 18 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 28.4% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🤡5228.4%
💩3418.6%
158.20%
👎126.56%
🖕94.92%
😨94.92%
🤮84.37%
👏63.28%
😁63.28%
👍52.73%
😱52.73%
🤔52.73%
🤬52.73%
🗿42.19%
🤓42.19%
🙏21.09%
🎉10.546%
🐳10.546%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 183reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 13 March 2026 to 15 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
1
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 20 we hold a reading for · 5%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @GodKnowYouNews. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 20 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 13 March 2026 to 15 July 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

15 Jul 2026, 06:21 UTC475 views5 reactionsread 7 August 2026

其實我寫BOT係興趣, 用來學下新野試下唔同方式做下野 哈哈哈 我亂9來一D都唔專業, 所以唔好對我太大期望 加上一一出左世我都比較忙玩B

👍2🙏2👏1

15 Jul 2026, 06:12 UTC491 views1 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

成隻BOT重新寫... SCRIPT同DB都由頭起過🤣 由MYSQL轉POSTGRES 好似會快D🤡

👎1

4 Jul 2026, 07:38 UTC≈143,000 views5 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

有人假冒了我的網址🙃 我的是.cc 不是.co

😱5

2 Jul 2026, 13:00 UTC≈1,710 views2 reactionsread 7 August 2026

我老豆好狗🙃 https://www.instagram.com/reel/DaSS_BBh4b7

👎2

30 Jun 2026, 15:59 UTC≈1,920 views4 reactionsread 7 August 2026

痴撚線的老豆🤪 https://www.instagram.com/reel/DaNwEcaBAPy

👏2🤬2

30 Jun 2026, 08:37 UTC≈2,170 views6 reactionsread 7 August 2026

可能我個人比較唔正常 哈哈哈 我都鄧我個女覺得慘, 不同意義上....

🤡4🤔1🤬1

30 Jun 2026, 08:35 UTC≈125,000 views10 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

我公司開了個AI Hackaton... 希望一今po野唔會比人又當我bot咁直接封左我個公司account... 之次搞左差唔多成個月先當番我係員工開番我個account,如果再封不如直接炒我賠錢🤣

💩6🤡2🖕1🤔1

28 Jun 2026, 11:10 UTC≈143,000 views4 reactionsread 7 August 2026

😏 https://www.instagram.com/reel/DaHwnFMpOnh

😁31

19 Jun 2026, 03:34 UTC≈170,000 views10 reactionsread 7 August 2026

端午節快樂~ 大家食左傻未🫨 今日好多人出海,應該係要做海賊王🤣 https://www.instagram.com/reel/DZuGw6bxtjJ/

🤡7👎3

12 Jun 2026, 09:25 UTC≈163,000 views11 reactionsread 7 August 2026

神膠b真係好得意🤖 哈哈哈哈哈哈哈哈哈哈哈🤪 https://www.instagram.com/reel/DZewcYSBU5B

🤡8👎21

12 May 2026, 06:12 UTC≈5,760 views11 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

其實我還想改把手看看廳不能輕鬆突破10萬轉, 只是配件有點貴... 還要測測陀螺能不能承受2萬轉+... 制造真的能爆船的爆旋陀螺🤡

🤡7👎31

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @GodKnowYouNews. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 555,840 of 1,481,243entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“神膠官方頻道🚯” (@GodKnowYouNews), 1,480 subscribers as measured 15 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/GodKnowYouNews.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.