Crypto & trading β a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channelβs own recent posts on 10 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a modelβs judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured β it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
64 measurements spanning 97 days, net -1,607. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between β snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean βno change observedβ, never βinterpolatedβ. The vertical axis spans 15,352β17,441 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log β every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 64
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
12 Nov 2026, 06:40
15,593
-27
10 Nov 2026, 08:19
15,620
-16
8 Nov 2026, 17:11
15,636
-21
7 Nov 2026, 10:17
15,657
-20
6 Nov 2026, 08:11
15,677
-9
5 Nov 2026, 05:27
15,686
-16
4 Nov 2026, 05:20
15,702
-14
3 Nov 2026, 04:50
15,716
-12
2 Nov 2026, 02:00
15,728
-20
31 Oct 2026, 23:55
15,748
-11
30 Oct 2026, 20:30
15,759
-22
29 Oct 2026, 19:17
15,781
-6
28 Oct 2026, 22:21
15,787
-20
27 Oct 2026, 18:06
15,807
-15
26 Oct 2026, 15:58
15,822
-19
25 Oct 2026, 15:55
15,841
-16
24 Oct 2026, 17:55
15,857
-6
23 Oct 2026, 20:59
15,863
-10
22 Oct 2026, 21:35
15,873
-24
21 Oct 2026, 17:17
15,897
first reading
Engagement
65 posts held, back to 29 July 2026 β the reader has not yet reached the start of this channelβs public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 75 pages of Telegramβs post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR Β· 30 days
63.8%
avg views Γ· 15,593 subscribers
Avg views / post
9,950
15 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.536%
reactions Γ· views Β· ER floor
Posts in window
15
of 65 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) Γ· views β note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegramβs public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days Β· latest post in window 12 November 2026
Posts held
65 (29 July 2026 β 12 November 2026)
Views total
149,220
Reactions total
800
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface β not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
13 Nov 2026, 06:59 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than βcorrectingβ the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form β 8.12K, 3.7M β so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded β read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
82
Videos
1
Links
1
Lifetime counters from Telegramβs own channel header, read 13 November 2026 β not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegramβs rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Video runtime
32s
Average length
32s
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel β not this channelβs whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegramβs own rounded chrome, so it carries no β mark.
Reaction mix
2,464 reactions across 65 posts, in 24 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 19.6% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities β π is thanks in one channel and mourning in another β so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one β 4.34K, 1.2M β so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 65 of the 65 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegramβs own count on each post β not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above β those same posts carry 2,464 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by βa reaction total printed elsewhere on the pageβ.
Measured over the 65 most recent posts we hold, published 29 July 2026 to 12 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
Telegramβs own βeditedβ marker: 8 of 15 posts held from the last 30 days (53.3%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before β this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
π¨LATEST: Tom Leeβs Bitmine generated $121M in staking revenue but reported $6.3 BILLION in annual losses
Tom Lee's Bitmine generated $121.4 million in staking and validation revenue, accounting for nearly 97% of its total annual revenue, according to its latest 10-K.
The company however posted a $6.31 billion net loss, primarily driven by unrealized losses as ETH fell approximately 44% in the fiscal year.
BREAKING: $NVDA is up over 5% in premarket, recovering most of yesterdayβs 5.47% drop.
CoreWeave, one of Nvidiaβs biggest chip buyers, just raised its 2026 revenue forecast, a sign AI demand for Nvidia chips is still strong.
BREAKING: $NVDA crashes 8% at market open as news of CEO Jensen Huang's affair with a suspected Chinese spy hits the market.
$1.05 trillion has been added to US stocks today, while Nvidia alone has lost $361 billion in market value.
It looks like money is rotating out of Nvidia and into the rest of the market.
DATA: Investors BRACED for deeper sell-off, as put trading hits an ALL-TIME HIGH on THURSDAY.
A record 11.23 MILLION put contracts traded on Cboe, a major U.S. options exchange, on November 5.
Thatβs nearly 10% ABOVE the previous record.
As stocks fell, more than 112 MILLION options contracts traded across the U.S. market, per Bloomberg.
Just OVER HALF were puts.
The surge suggests investors were HEDGING againstβ¦
πΊπΈ JUST IN: J.D. Vance leads Kalshiβs 2028 Republican nomination odds at 33%, followed by Marco Rubio (20%) and Ron DeSantis (17%).
Jon Ossoff leads Democrats at 25%, ahead of Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (13%) and Gavin Newsom (12%).
π°π· BREAKING: South Koreaβs KOSPI plunges 8.8% below 5,000, freezing trading for the 11th time this year.
The circuit breaker fires when the KOSPI falls 8%, and before 2026 it had only been triggered 6 times.
The KOSPI is now 46% below its June record.
Its 2 biggest stocks, Samsung and SK Hynix, make the memory inside Nvidiaβs AI chips, and US chip stocks just had their 2nd worst day on record.
South Koreaβs finanβ¦
π¨ MARKET: Stock futures slip as investors await US midterm results, with S&P 500 futures down 0.5% and Nasdaq futures down 0.9%.
Bitcoin drops more than 1% to around $76,800 as traders grow confident Democrats will retake the Senate, with Ether and other major coins close behind.
Every midterm in history, Bitcoin DUMPS then PUMPS... π€
Since 2014, every US midterm election has followed the same pattern for BTC:
2014: β50% in 71 days, +24.5% a year later
2018: β50% in 38 days, +44.9% a year later
2022: β25% in 13 days, +92.3% a year later
2026 will put that to test.
Bitcoin is currently trading around $78,000 and is still holding above its 20-week moving average. π€
This is an important level to keep an eye on.
The 20-week SMA is sitting around $73,750, while the upper Bollinger Band is near $91,200.
As long as BTC holds above that $73,750 region on the weekly timeframe, the broader recovery remains intact.
Lose it, and things could start looking very different.
For now, thisβ¦
Showing the 12 most recent of 65 posts we hold for @GlobalTradingHubHQ. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked β was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it β t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so β1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts recorded as deleted after publishing
We recorded 3 posts on @GlobalTradingHubHQ as deleted β posts this register held that were missing from the channelβs public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.
A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channelβs public page, and when β not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.
First seen missing
24 August 2026
Most recent seen missing
30 August 2026
Median time before seen missing
4 days
Seen missing in the last 30 days
0
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason β naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides β the βNamed by N registered channelsβ figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 November 2026 β this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
βGlobal Trading Hub πβ (@GlobalTradingHubHQ), 15,593 subscribers as measured 12 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/GlobalTradingHubHQ.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV Β· JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.