Channel
@GladeTrade
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Posts · Cite this entry
78subscribers
+8 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002469987122 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @GladeTrade |
| Created | Between 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 10 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 31 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 2 times, most recently 31 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/GladeTrade |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 23 Aug 2026, 04:16 | 78 | +2 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 05:35 | 76 | +6 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 00:02 | 70 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 19:43 | 70 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 4 September 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 9 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (4 September 2025 – 9 August 2026) |
| Views total | 41 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 10 Aug 2026, 00:02 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
OPPORTUNITY TO JOIN COINVERGENCE We are recruiting talent for what we are treating as the LAST bullrun. The LAST opportunity to make it out. Since our founding in 2024, our membership has been on a selective, invite-only basis. This is not a paid group. Last cycle, we made life-changing money. Naturally, we intend to do that again - and run it up harder than ever. Crypto is STILL the undisputed arena to run it up…
I’ve been in crypto for the best part of a decade, and today I’m seeing: • DATs selling • No new retail inflows • Liquidity drying up • Projects going bankrupt and coins being delisted • Three exchanges going down in a single month • Zero CT hype. Zero normie interest. To me, these are all classic ACCUMULATION SIGNALS!
https://youtu.be/Jbh3GlrRcQ4?si=k60vds09HpevqclU
In crypto, we need to position ourselves in a way that maximises our chances of WINNING, regardless of what happens next. Right now we are obviously in a bear market, and the question many of us have been wrestling with for a while now: “Do I DCA now, or wait for the historically expected cycle bottom in Q4?” The key is to avoid a black-and-white mindset and remain open to every possibility. We could have already…
Cashflow outside of crypto is what separates serious investors from gamblers. It creates stability — and that stability is what allows you to make clear, unemotional decisions in the market. In crypto, we’re forward-thinking by default. And right now, it’s obvious to us that AI represents the biggest wealth opportunity since the dawn of the internet age. That makes positioning in AI not just logical, but necessary.…
🌎💵 World Cup Fantasy League is coming 🏆⚽️ For this summer’s 2026 FIFA World Cup, I’m putting together a pay-to-play fantasy football league. There will be a cash prize for the winner, with 100% of the prize pool paid out to them. For example, if 20 people join for $50 each, the winner takes home $1,000 after the World Cup final. This is just an example, as the buy-in hasn’t been decided yet and could be higher, bu…
Note this link was supposed to require admin approval, but for some reason it didn’t work. Meaning if you join as an ANON, with no mutual connections, no Telegram Premium (🚩), or a number starting with +91 or +234…. You will likely be removed to maintain the quality of the network we have worked hard to build over the years.
My full thesis can be read inside Coinvergence. https://t.me/+QADHDINBaYYxYTUx
OSOBOT $OSO (0xc78fAbC2cB5B9cf59E0Af3Da8E3Bc46d47753A4e) TL;DR: An under-the-radar AI-agent infrastructure play building on MetaMask’s permission and smart-account stack. WHAT IT ACTUALLY IS $OSO is the token powering Osobot - an autonomous AI agent powered by Claude Opus 4.6 via OpenClaw, running on MetaMask’s permission primitives. Osobot is a permission-first, genuinely autonomous AI. It browses the web, writes…
Accepting new members into Baseline Protocol. Level up in all areas of life: health, aesthetics, relationships, money. Get in quick before we close it for good. https://t.me/+XcFmeOgEw2BiNzg0
I’ve been quiet lately, not because I’ve disappeared, but because there hasn’t been much worth saying. I’m waiting for BTC to get close to its 200WMA before deploying any sizeable capital. My main focus has been stacking cash in the real world, something I neglected during the bullrun as I was so zeroed in on the market. While stocks and metals have been hot in recent times, I still see crypto as the arena to be in…
If you don’t have either an AI-resistant skill or income-producing assets, you’re on a path to economic servitude within 5–10 years. You will barely scrape by on a miserly UBI allowance, and the paths to wealth will be closed. Your number 1 priority should be achieving economic autonomy.
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @GladeTrade. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 23 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Glade Trade” (@GladeTrade), 78 subscribers as measured 23 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/GladeTrade.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.