Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

𝗚𝗜𝗙𝗧 𝗛𝗨𝗕

@GiftHub_Shop

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

558subscribers

-39 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003831344962
TypeChannel
Username@GiftHub_Shop
CreatedBetween 1 February 2026 and 30 June 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live8 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 8 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/GiftHub_Shop

Growth

558597577.57 Aug 2026, 19:41 — 597 subscribers8 Aug 2026, 03:16 — 597 subscribers8 Aug 2026, 13:34 — 558 subscribers7 Aug 2026, 19:418 Aug 2026, 13:34
3 measurements taken within a single day, net -39. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 552–603 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
8 Aug 2026, 13:34558-39
8 Aug 2026, 03:16597no change
7 Aug 2026, 19:41597first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 3 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
19.3%
avg views ÷ 558 subscribers
Avg views / post
108
20 posts measured
Reaction rate
5.93%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
20
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 18 of 20 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026
Posts held20 (3 August 20267 August 2026)
Views total2,159
Reactions total115
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken8 Aug 2026, 03:16 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
38s
Average length
38s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

115 reactions across 18 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 21.7% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 59425177643578895022521.7%
custom 59405424015242764662219.1%
custom 59403709120700819211916.5%
custom 59403582376215908771815.7%
custom 59430255068016873931210.4%
custom 521095630695275891086.96%
custom 531881539116048679265.22%
custom 531923093783630987954.35%

Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 115reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 3 August 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
5
across the posts below
Posts paid on
5
of 20 we hold a reading for · 25%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @GiftHub_Shop. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 20 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 3 August 2026 to 7 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

7 Aug 2026, 14:17 UTC28 views2 reactionsread 8 August 2026

💎 Account for sell 👤 User: @ci_aci 💸 Price: 28 TON کل اکانتم رو میفروشم قیمت ربات ربات قیمت کف میده و من قیمت کف دارم میفروشم و تازه پول اک خز بودن رو نمیگیرم و پول اکانت اسکم و چنل اسکم دیزاین هم نمیگیرم 👌 تکی تکی نمیفروشم و کارتی قبول نیست فقط ارز Ton💸 ایدیم جهت هماهنگی : @SPIDER_GIFTHUB 🕷 قیمتش هم یه کوچولو به خریدار تخفیف میدم

custom 59405424015242764662

Signed 𝑽𝒐𝒊𝒅 𝟏𝟕:𝟒𝟕

7 Aug 2026, 09:58 UTC35 views7 reactionsread 8 August 2026

‼️Nft for sale 💎 💵Price : 6 Ton 🟡Backdrop: silver blue 🔗 https://t.me/nft/StarNotepad-63726 @GiftHub_Shop #Number37

custom 59403582376215908773custom 52109563069527589102custom 53192309378363098792

Signed 𝑽𝒐𝒊𝒅 𝟏𝟑:𝟐𝟖

7 Aug 2026, 08:24 UTC53 views13 reactions1 Starread 8 August 2026

درود خدمت بچه های گیفت هاب عمو وید برگشته 🕺

custom 59405424015242764665custom 59425177643578895025custom 59403709120700819213

Signed 𝑽𝒐𝒊𝒅 𝟏𝟏:𝟓𝟒

6 Aug 2026, 21:38 UTC68 views8 reactions1 Starread 8 August 2026

یکی که از فرایند دوندگی فیشینگ سر در میاره توضیح بده چیکار کنم 5 میل فیشینگ شدم حسابم بلوکه شده

custom 59425177643578895024custom 59430255068016873933custom 59403582376215908771

Signed 𝗦𝗣𝗜𝗗𝗘𝗥

6 Aug 2026, 19:27 UTC68 views6 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

آقا ما سهم خودمون رو زدیم مبارکش GiftHub_Shop🕷

custom 59403709120700819216

Signed 𝗦𝗣𝗜𝗗𝗘𝗥

6 Aug 2026, 11:11 UTC76 views6 reactionsread 8 August 2026

عا مبارکشون جایزشون رو شب میدیم

custom 59425177643578895026

Signed 𝗦𝗣𝗜𝗗𝗘𝗥

6 Aug 2026, 10:49 UTC76 views3 reactionsread 8 August 2026

🎊 قرعه‌کشی دوتا گیفت گل رز برای دو فرد گل پایان یافت! ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ 🏆 جایزه: گیفت تلگرام 👥 شرکت‌کنندگان: 118 نفر ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ ✅ برنده‌ها: 1 - @ab2olfazl — 8 🎟 2 - @Matinex0 — 12 🎟

custom 59405424015242764663

Signed Win Land

5 Aug 2026, 17:43 UTC115 views10 reactionsread 8 August 2026

دارن لفت میدن هوراااا

custom 52109563069527589106custom 59430255068016873933custom 53192309378363098791

Signed 𝗦𝗣𝗜𝗗𝗘𝗥

5 Aug 2026, 16:42 UTC125 views6 reactions1 Starread 8 August 2026

بابا فیک نزنید رو چالش هامون اک فیک وین نمیشه !! الان نگاه میگم طرف 10 تا فیک زده خب آقا چنل ماهم گوه میشه توش فیک نزنید جان عزیزتون @GiftHub_Shop

custom 59403582376215908776

Signed 𝗦𝗣𝗜𝗗𝗘𝗥

4 Aug 2026, 21:17 UTC153 views8 reactionsread 8 August 2026

555 Member 🥂

custom 59403709120700819215custom 53192309378363098791custom 59403582376215908771custom 59425177643578895021

Signed 𝗦𝗣𝗜𝗗𝗘𝗥

4 Aug 2026, 18:42 UTC162 views8 reactions1 Starread 8 August 2026

تلگرام واقعا عجیبه ظهری منو از اک انداخت بیرون الان اومدم توش نصف کسای که پیویم بودن دیه نیستن یه سری هارو پیدا کردم ولی هیچ کدوم از مسیج هام نیستش این چه مسخره بازیه آخه تازه خودش پروف و اسمم مثل قبلا کرد دوباره عوضش کردم 👀 بديش اینه رفیقام نمیدونن تلگرامم اینجوری شده فعک میکنن خودم مسیج هامو پاکیدم گوه سگ توش @GiftHub_Shop 🕷

custom 59425177643578895024custom 59403582376215908773custom 53192309378363098791

Signed 𝗦𝗣𝗜𝗗𝗘𝗥

4 Aug 2026, 12:13 UTC171 views7 reactionsread 8 August 2026

ری اکشن نمیزنید؟

custom 59403709120700819215custom 53188153911604867921custom 59403582376215908771

Signed Haj_rick

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @GiftHub_Shop. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 335,424 of 1,160,990entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“𝗚𝗜𝗙𝗧 𝗛𝗨𝗕” (@GiftHub_Shop), 558 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/GiftHub_Shop.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.