🗽А ЧЕ ТАК МАЛО УЧАСТНИКОВ??? охуенная статья Джордана

Channel
Gift From Holder
@GiftFromHolder
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Posts recorded as deleted · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
26,897subscribers
+897 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1002110533262 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @GiftFromHolder |
| Description | 🐸Новости про крипту и бесконечные раздачи 🐸Наш чат для общения - @GiftFromHolderChat 🐸Наш бот по покупке звезд - @StarsGFHbot 🐸По поводу сотрудничества - @altcoinsholder, @OPBDB, менеджеры - @gfhmanage 🐸Даю на отписку сутки. Только СНГ |
| Created | Between 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 11 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 64 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 11 November 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/GiftFromHolder |
Topic
Giveaways & airdrops — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 97% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 11 Nov 2026, 00:08 | 26,897 | -33 |
| 9 Nov 2026, 07:51 | 26,930 | -193 |
| 7 Nov 2026, 20:49 | 27,123 | +764 |
| 6 Nov 2026, 16:50 | 26,359 | -57 |
| 5 Nov 2026, 17:54 | 26,416 | -95 |
| 4 Nov 2026, 18:36 | 26,511 | -116 |
| 3 Nov 2026, 15:49 | 26,627 | +1,261 |
| 2 Nov 2026, 13:24 | 25,366 | -34 |
| 1 Nov 2026, 11:25 | 25,400 | -81 |
| 31 Oct 2026, 07:48 | 25,481 | -54 |
| 30 Oct 2026, 08:37 | 25,535 | -4 |
| 29 Oct 2026, 07:50 | 25,539 | -39 |
| 28 Oct 2026, 09:29 | 25,578 | +93 |
| 27 Oct 2026, 09:06 | 25,485 | -67 |
| 26 Oct 2026, 12:06 | 25,552 | +818 |
| 25 Oct 2026, 11:51 | 24,734 | -34 |
| 24 Oct 2026, 09:21 | 24,768 | -59 |
| 23 Oct 2026, 05:51 | 24,827 | -35 |
| 22 Oct 2026, 03:08 | 24,862 | -15 |
| 21 Oct 2026, 00:31 | 24,877 | first reading |
Engagement
139 posts held, back to 8 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 150 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 7.61%
- avg views ÷ 26,897 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 2,050
- 77 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 10.1%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 77
- of 139 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 74 of 77 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 November 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 139 (8 July 2026 – 12 November 2026) |
| Views total | 157,516 |
| Reactions total | 15,935 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 12 Nov 2026, 09:52 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- ≈4,600
- Videos
- ≈219
- Links
- ≈5,020
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
- Video runtime
- 4s
- Average length
- 2s
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
29,568 reactions across 135 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 33.4% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| custom 5422623316185737711 | 9,870 | 33.4% | |
| ❤ | 4,424 | 15.0% | |
| custom 5402099913746050915 | 4,029 | 13.6% | |
| 🔥 | 3,924 | 13.3% | |
| 🌚 | 1,974 | 6.68% | |
| custom 5413818427070504499 | 1,659 | 5.61% | |
| custom 5429133322670335508 | 1,627 | 5.50% | |
| custom 5429466221290481288 | 937 | 3.17% | |
| custom 5406893243277272765 | 703 | 2.38% | |
| ⚡ | 290 | 0.981% | |
| ❤🔥 | 131 | 0.443% |
Custom emoji. 6 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 135 of the 139 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 29,568 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 139 most recent posts we hold, published 8 July 2026 to 12 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
- Stars received
- 73
- across the posts below
- Posts paid on
- 32
- of 139 we hold a reading for · 23%
- Most on one post
- 16
- single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @GiftFromHolder. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 139 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 8 July 2026 to 12 November 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 51 of 77 posts held from the last 30 days (66.2%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
🗽СТАТУЯ ДЖОРДАНА — САМЫМ ЛЮБИМЫМ ЖАБАМ! » подписка на @VantaGifts Итоги вечером 🐸 Увл. Шанс | Звезды от Holdera
custom 540209991374605091556custom 541381842707050449935custom 542262331618573771134
👍3 НФТ БЕСПЛАТНО👍 Условия простые - шансы большие🐂 От вас подписка: @rcavery @satoshi_ivents 💵Кто не зайдет = проебет
custom 540209991374605091521custom 541381842707050449910custom 542262331618573771110
🔥 LUDO ВОЗВРАЩАЕТСЯ — И НЕ С ПУСТЫМИ РУКАМИ 👑 Мы ушли в тень, чтобы сделать то, чего ещё нет ни у кого. 🎮 Кастомные игры — новый формат, который мы запускаем первыми: 💣 Мины — открывай клетки, обходи мины и забирай множитель вовремя 🚀 Ракетка — множитель растёт, пока ракета летит. Успей забрать до взрыва ♠ Блэкджек — собери 21 и обыграй дилера 💎 В честь запуска — розыгрыш 1111$ Среди игроков, сделавших депозит от…
custom 542262331618573771115custom 54020999137460509158custom 54138184270705044998
🎂МОНОХРОМ ТОРТИК — САМЫМ ЛЮБИМЫМ ЖАБАМ! 🏆Победитель: 1. booba (@bisuto) ✔️Проверить результаты
custom 5422623316185737711138custom 541381842707050449990custom 540209991374605091580custom 542946622129048128822
🐍КИНДЕР СЮРПРИЗ — САМЫМ БЫСТРЫМ ЖАБАМ! 🏆Победитель: 1. Sayeh Salehi (@Sayool) ✔️Проверить результаты
custom 542262331618573771157custom 540209991374605091528custom 542946622129048128825custom 541381842707050449915
🎁ПЧЕЛИНАЯ ШЛЯПА — ЛЮБИМЫМ ЖАБКАМ! 🏆Победитель: 1. 𝒚𝒖𝒌𝒂 (@richtetka) ✔️Проверить результаты
custom 542262331618573771199custom 540209991374605091564custom 542946622129048128848custom 541381842707050449922
🎁ДУРОВ ЗАКИНУЛ БАБОС делаем на него раздачу??? 🐸 Звезды от Holdera
custom 541381842707050449945custom 542262331618573771118custom 540209991374605091516custom 54294662212904812886
🎒РЮКЗАК — 5 МИНУТ! 🏆Победитель: 1. Марияmissed (@mari_kuz67missed) ✔️Проверить результаты
custom 540209991374605091576custom 542946622129048128848custom 541381842707050449944custom 542913332267033550816custom 54226233161857377119
🎁 Розыгрыш 50 подарков 🙂 3 МАСКИ РАНДОМ ⭐️ 2500 звезда 🔑 @ClubPepe
custom 540209991374605091513custom 54226233161857377118custom 54138184270705044995
🗽ОХУЕННАЯ СТАТУЯ — САМЫМ ЛЮБИМЫМ ЖАБКАМ! 🏆Победитель: 1. нилка (@n_eje) ✔️Проверить результаты
custom 541381842707050449938custom 542262331618573771130custom 540209991374605091520
🎁ДОГОВОРИЛСЯ С ОХУЕНКО НАСЧЕТ НОВЫХ УЛУЧШЕНИЙ!!! пишите в коммы, какие гифты ждете больше всего, передам ему 🐸 Звезды от Holdera
custom 542262331618573771151custom 541381842707050449920custom 540209991374605091518custom 54291333226703355084custom 54294662212904812882
Showing the 12 most recent of 139 posts we hold for @GiftFromHolder. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts edited after publishing
@GiftFromHolder edited 20 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
- First edit seen
- 12 August 2026
- Most recent edit
- 7 November 2026
Posts recorded as deleted after publishing
We recorded 15 posts on @GiftFromHolder as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.
A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.
- First seen missing
- 7 August 2026
- Most recent seen missing
- 10 October 2026
- Median time before seen missing
- 4 days
- Seen missing in the last 30 days
- 0
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
@Domiktaylera · 20,6804 postsРозыгрыши Подарков | Gifts | Stars | Premium
@giveaway_freegifts · 7,0124 postsGIVEAWAY_FOR_FREE
@giveaway_for_free · 4,7702 postsشکارچی
@Anjoman_Shekarchiyan · 4,7591 postGifts Zone | Giveaways
@GftZon · 6,1511 postLottery 🎁
@Lottery_new · 3,2321 postSailor.nft
@Sailornft1 · 6,1961 postТретий канал
@channel3sv · 5,2041 postگیفت میفت | 𝗚𝗜𝗙𝗧 𝗠𝗜𝗙𝗧 | GIVEAWAYS
@giftawayss · 3,8071 post𝗚𝗶𝘃𝗲𝗮𝘄𝗮𝘆 𝗙𝗶𝗻𝗱𝗲𝗿 | 𝗟𝗼𝘁𝘁𝗲𝗿𝘆 | 𝗚𝗶𝗳𝘁
@givifinder · 6,6131 postmehr
@mehrgray · 2981 postМиллион
@miillionee · 2,3131 post
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 8 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
@price_repost · 37 postsAD taihen
@taihenprice · 263 postsPrice domovenok
@domik_domovenka163 · 12 posts🎁 Домик Тайлера
@Domiktaylera · 20,6802 postsFreakNFT
@FREAKNFT10 · 25,4211 postМенеджеры GFH
@gfhmanage · 71 postРозыгрыши Подарков | Gifts | Stars | Premium
@giveaway_freegifts · 7,0121 postHolder забронировано
@play2claim · 141 post
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
@random · 3,143,40189 postsRandomize Bot 🎲 [Рандомайзер]
@randomized · 3,418,9053 postsмишка Акернича
@akernichchannel · 3,2221 postЧат акернич
@akernichchat · 1,1871 postBeeGifts
@BeeGft_bot · 20,7011 postFLASH STARFALL
@flash_sta3fall · 10,4951 postForfor Vor
@forfor_goy · 9,5231 postFreakNFT
@FREAKNFT10 · 25,4211 postПодарки
@gifts_nftishki · 8681 postGIFTSDouble
@giftsdouble · 6,0041 postКАНАЛ УКРАЛИ!
@ima_polzovotela · 21 postJetTon Official
@jetton · 5121 postminterlud
@minterlud · 11 postnew_STARFALL Chat
@new_sta3fall · 2,4371 postRat Gaming
@playrat · 3,7571 postPortals Market
@portals · 441,1561 postРикимару
@rcavery · 5,7271 postRubUP
@rubup · 2,939,1581 postSaToShi Ivent +777
@satoshi_ivents · 5,9781 postзвезды от WAKE
@wakerent · 8,1651 post
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
- Dead references
- 2
- handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
- Evidenced gone
- 1
- we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
- Never seen alive
- 1
- vacant every time we have ever looked
@GiftFromHolder named 2 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Evidenced gone
We ourselves saw each of these resolve to a real page at some point before it went vacant — a genuine, evidenced change, not an inference from absence.
named in 1 post, 15 October 2026 – 15 October 2026 · confirmed gone 17 October 2026 (two independent sightings — see how we confirm a dead handle)evidenced
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
named in 1 post, 12 August 2026 – 12 August 2026
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Gift From Holder” (@GiftFromHolder), 26,897 subscribers as measured 11 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/GiftFromHolder.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.