Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Solana Early Hunter 🎯

Channel

Solana Early Hunter 🎯

@GetSolanaHunter

On this record: Growth Β· Engagement Β· Reactions Β· Posts Β· Citations Β· Cite this entry

1,866subscribers

-33 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register Β· movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002262312463
TypeChannel
Username@GetSolanaHunter
CreatedBetween 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025β€” estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live29 August 2026
Measurements held9
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 29 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/GetSolanaHunter

Growth

1,8661,8991,882.57 August 2026 β€” 1,899 subscribers7 August 2026 β€” 1,899 subscribers8 August 2026 β€” 1,898 subscribers14 August 2026 β€” 1,895 subscribers17 August 2026 β€” 1,887 subscribers20 August 2026 β€” 1,883 subscribers23 August 2026 β€” 1,874 subscribers26 August 2026 β€” 1,870 subscribers29 August 2026 β€” 1,866 subscribers7 August 202629 August 2026
9 measurements spanning 22 days, net -33. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between β€” snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean β€œno change observed”, never β€œinterpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,861–1,904 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log β€” every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
29 Aug 2026, 13:051,866-4
26 Aug 2026, 17:231,870-4
23 Aug 2026, 22:581,874-9
20 Aug 2026, 01:231,883-4
17 Aug 2026, 10:151,887-8
14 Aug 2026, 02:061,895-3
8 Aug 2026, 00:541,898-1
7 Aug 2026, 15:321,899no change
7 Aug 2026, 13:011,899first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 19 May 2025 β€” the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute β€” we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 20 May 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

3 reactions across 2 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 66.7% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
😱266.7%
πŸ‘133.3%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities β€” πŸ™ is thanks in one channel and mourning in another β€” so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one β€” 4.34K, 1.2M β€” so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 2 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post β€” not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above β€” those same posts carry 3reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by β€œa reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 19 May 2025 to 20 May 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

20 May 2025, 12:39 UTC779 views2 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

πŸ”₯ Violette | $VIO πŸ•’ Age: 20m πŸ”— CHART πŸ’° MC: $41.8K | πŸ’§ Liq: $22.2K πŸ“ˆ Vol (1hr): $90.0K | πŸ§‘β€πŸ€β€πŸ§‘ Holders: 440 | Historical Success Rate: 36.0 Top20-Traders Satisfactory Profit: 50.0% (🟠) Top20-Holders Satisfactory Profit: 12.5% (🟒) Top20-Traders Holding Ratio: 28.6% (πŸ”΄) Top10 Analysis ⚑️: 🌳🦐🐟🐟🐟🐟🐟🐬🐬 Largest Balance: 399.22 SOL Smallest Balance: 4.30 SOL Avg. Top 10: 71.79 SOL Avg. Win Rate: 51.08% Total Invested: 10.…

😱2

20 May 2025, 09:42 UTC528 viewsread 7 August 2026
Photo

πŸ”₯ Legit And Real Product | $LARP πŸ•’ Age: 1h πŸ”— CHART πŸ’° MC: $28.6K | πŸ’§ Liq: $19.5K πŸ“ˆ Vol (1hr): $807.1K | πŸ§‘β€πŸ€β€πŸ§‘ Holders: 373 | Historical Success Rate: 42.7 Top20-Traders Satisfactory Profit: NaN% (βšͺ) Top20-Holders Satisfactory Profit: 4.0% (🟒) Top20-Traders Holding Ratio: NaN% (βšͺ) Top10 Analysis ⚑️: 🌳🦐🐟🐟🐟🐟🐟🐟🐬 Largest Balance: 163.51 SOL Smallest Balance: 0.00 SOL Avg. Top 10: 38.32 SOL Avg. Win Rate: 34.81% Total I…

20 May 2025, 07:56 UTC305 viewsread 7 August 2026
Photo

πŸ”₯ The Herd Theory | $Herd πŸ•’ Age: 59m πŸ”— CHART πŸ’° MC: $27.3K | πŸ’§ Liq: $18.6K πŸ“ˆ Vol (1hr): $407.8K | πŸ§‘β€πŸ€β€πŸ§‘ Holders: 267 | Historical Success Rate: 34.3 Top20-Traders Satisfactory Profit: NaN% (βšͺ) Top20-Holders Satisfactory Profit: 16.0% (🟒) Top20-Traders Holding Ratio: NaN% (βšͺ) Top10 Analysis ⚑️: 🌳🌳🌳🦐🐟🐟🐟🐬🐳 Largest Balance: 1339.78 SOL Smallest Balance: 3.30 SOL Avg. Top 10: 205.48 SOL Avg. Win Rate: 44.96% Total Inve…

20 May 2025, 07:04 UTC242 viewsread 7 August 2026
Photo

πŸ”₯ Bitcoin Alice | $ALICE πŸ•’ Age: 28m πŸ”— CHART πŸ’° MC: $27.0K | πŸ’§ Liq: $18.2K πŸ“ˆ Vol (1hr): $198.3K | πŸ§‘β€πŸ€β€πŸ§‘ Holders: 276 | Historical Success Rate: 34.3 Top20-Traders Satisfactory Profit: NaN% (βšͺ) Top20-Holders Satisfactory Profit: NaN%(βšͺ) Top20-Traders Holding Ratio: NaN% (βšͺ) Top10 Analysis ⚑️: 🌳🌳🌳🌳🦐🦐🐟🐟 Largest Balance: 23.96 SOL Smallest Balance: 0.00 SOL Avg. Top 10: 7.50 SOL Avg. Win Rate: 49.91% Total Invested: 1.…

20 May 2025, 06:45 UTC159 viewsread 7 August 2026
Photo

πŸ”₯ AssStrategy | $ASTR πŸ•’ Age: 18m πŸ”— CHART πŸ’° MC: $43.9K | πŸ’§ Liq: $23.1K πŸ“ˆ Vol (1hr): $116.4K | πŸ§‘β€πŸ€β€πŸ§‘ Holders: 414 | Historical Success Rate: 36.3 Top20-Traders Satisfactory Profit: NaN% (βšͺ) Top20-Holders Satisfactory Profit: NaN%(βšͺ) Top20-Traders Holding Ratio: 12.5% (πŸ”΄) Top10 Analysis ⚑️: 🌳🌳🌳🌳🌳🌳🦐🦐🐟 Largest Balance: 30.70 SOL Smallest Balance: 2.99 SOL Avg. Top 10: 7.26 SOL Avg. Win Rate: 45.81% Total Invested: 1.9…

20 May 2025, 06:39 UTC114 viewsread 7 August 2026
Photo

πŸ”₯ AssStrategy | $ASTR πŸ•’ Age: 12m πŸ”— CHART πŸ’° MC: $43.3K | πŸ’§ Liq: $22.9K πŸ“ˆ Vol (1hr): $96.4K | πŸ§‘β€πŸ€β€πŸ§‘ Holders: 389 | Historical Success Rate: 36.3 Top20-Traders Satisfactory Profit: NaN% (βšͺ) Top20-Holders Satisfactory Profit: NaN%(βšͺ) Top20-Traders Holding Ratio: 14.3% (πŸ”΄) Top10 Analysis ⚑️: 🌳🦐🦐🦐🦐🦐🦐🐟🐟 Largest Balance: 34.47 SOL Smallest Balance: 4.28 SOL Avg. Top 10: 10.79 SOL Avg. Win Rate: 41.04% Total Invested: 2.1…

20 May 2025, 04:33 UTC95 views1 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

πŸ”₯ Cryptographic Ultra Money | $CUM πŸ•’ Age: 32m πŸ”— CHART πŸ’° MC: $45.1K | πŸ’§ Liq: $23.7K πŸ“ˆ Vol (1hr): $204.5K | πŸ§‘β€πŸ€β€πŸ§‘ Holders: 270 | Historical Success Rate: 35.0 Top20-Traders Satisfactory Profit: NaN% (βšͺ) Top20-Holders Satisfactory Profit: 44.0% (🟒) Top20-Traders Holding Ratio: 14.3% (πŸ”΄) Top10 Analysis ⚑️: 🦐🦐🦐🦐🐟🐟🐟🐟🐬 Largest Balance: 170.55 SOL Smallest Balance: 5.76 SOL Avg. Top 10: 32.15 SOL Avg. Win Rate: 35.52% To…

πŸ‘1

20 May 2025, 04:15 UTC96 viewsread 7 August 2026
Photo

πŸ”₯ Cryptographic Ultra Money | $CUM πŸ•’ Age: 14m πŸ”— CHART πŸ’° MC: $49.2K | πŸ’§ Liq: $24.5K πŸ“ˆ Vol (1hr): $120.6K | πŸ§‘β€πŸ€β€πŸ§‘ Holders: 278 | Historical Success Rate: 35.0 Top20-Traders Satisfactory Profit: 28.6% (🟒) Top20-Holders Satisfactory Profit: 28.0% (🟒) Top20-Traders Holding Ratio: 70.0% (🟠) Top10 Analysis ⚑️: 🌳🌳🦐🐟🐟🐟🐟🐟🐬 Largest Balance: 167.27 SOL Smallest Balance: 0.38 SOL Avg. Top 10: 32.44 SOL Avg. Win Rate: 41.60% T…

20 May 2025, 03:53 UTC92 viewsread 7 August 2026
Photo

πŸ”₯ Attention Is All You Need | $Attention πŸ•’ Age: 2h πŸ”— CHART πŸ’° MC: $36.6K | πŸ’§ Liq: $21.6K πŸ“ˆ Vol (1hr): $623.1K | πŸ§‘β€πŸ€β€πŸ§‘ Holders: 1611 | Historical Success Rate: 35.0 Top20-Traders Satisfactory Profit: NaN% (βšͺ) Top20-Holders Satisfactory Profit: 32.0% (🟒) Top20-Traders Holding Ratio: 25.0% (πŸ”΄) Top10 Analysis ⚑️: 🦐🦐🦐🦐🦐🦐🦐 Largest Balance: 7.51 SOL Smallest Balance: 5.58 SOL Avg. Top 10: 6.57 SOL Avg. Win Rate: 85.71% T…

20 May 2025, 01:16 UTC87 viewsread 7 August 2026
Photo

πŸ”₯ MIBS | $MIBS πŸ•’ Age: 11m πŸ”— CHART πŸ’° MC: $49.7K | πŸ’§ Liq: $25.0K πŸ“ˆ Vol (1hr): $442.9K | πŸ§‘β€πŸ€β€πŸ§‘ Holders: 447 | Historical Success Rate: 35.0 Top20-Traders Satisfactory Profit: 100.0% (πŸ”΄) Top20-Holders Satisfactory Profit: 25.0% (🟒) Top20-Traders Holding Ratio: 14.3% (πŸ”΄) Top10 Analysis ⚑️: 🌳🦐🦐🦐🦐🦐🐟🐟🐬 Largest Balance: 238.33 SOL Smallest Balance: 0.47 SOL Avg. Top 10: 35.23 SOL Avg. Win Rate: 29.30% Total Invested: 6.17…

20 May 2025, 00:35 UTC84 viewsread 7 August 2026
Photo

πŸ”₯ Fredgazim | $Fredgazim πŸ•’ Age: 2h πŸ”— CHART πŸ’° MC: $28.6K | πŸ’§ Liq: $19.3K πŸ“ˆ Vol (1hr): $534.0K | πŸ§‘β€πŸ€β€πŸ§‘ Holders: 336 | Historical Success Rate: 44.3 Top20-Traders Satisfactory Profit: NaN% (βšͺ) Top20-Holders Satisfactory Profit: NaN%(βšͺ) Top20-Traders Holding Ratio: 50.0% (🟠) Top10 Analysis ⚑️: 🌳🦐🦐🐟🐟🐟🐟🐟🐟 Largest Balance: 18.95 SOL Smallest Balance: 4.41 SOL Avg. Top 10: 11.63 SOL Avg. Win Rate: 26.02% Total Invested: …

19 May 2025, 18:34 UTC86 viewsread 7 August 2026
Photo

πŸ”₯ Kingnet AI Model | $Xingyi πŸ•’ Age: 29m πŸ”— CHART πŸ’° MC: $46.2K | πŸ’§ Liq: $23.4K πŸ“ˆ Vol (1hr): $144.7K | πŸ§‘β€πŸ€β€πŸ§‘ Holders: 263 | Historical Success Rate: 42.0 Top20-Traders Satisfactory Profit: 100.0% (πŸ”΄) Top20-Holders Satisfactory Profit: 4.0% (🟒) Top20-Traders Holding Ratio: 12.5% (πŸ”΄) Top10 Analysis ⚑️: 🌳🐟🐟🐟🐟🐟 Largest Balance: 92.22 SOL Smallest Balance: 4.64 SOL Avg. Top 10: 35.54 SOL Avg. Win Rate: 32.18% Total Inves…

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @GetSolanaHunter. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked β‰ˆ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it β€” t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so β‰ˆ1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank β€” 821,276 of 1,627,068entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below β€” republished posts weigh more than named mentions β€” and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page β€” a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel β€” every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched β€” that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

Ψ§ΩŠΨ¨ΩƒΨ³ | APEX BOT
@ApexBotSingal Β· 25,2447 posts

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason β€” naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides β€” the β€œNamed by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 29 August 2026 β€” this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

β€œSolana Early Hunter πŸŽ―β€ (@GetSolanaHunter), 1,866 subscribers as measured 29 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/GetSolanaHunter.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV Β· JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.