Channel
@GeopoliticalEconomy
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
2,558subscribers
-4 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1001590039986 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @GeopoliticalEconomy |
| Created | Between 1 August 2021 and 28 February 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 16 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 16 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/GeopoliticalEconomy |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 16 Aug 2026, 05:36 | 2,558 | -4 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 09:41 | 2,562 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 06:01 | 2,562 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 29 September 2024 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 28 August 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
1,066 reactions across 20 posts, in 23 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 23.7% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🤬 | 253 | 23.7% | |
| ❤ | 217 | 20.4% | |
| 👍 | 187 | 17.5% | |
| 💯 | 178 | 16.7% | |
| 🤮 | 55 | 5.16% | |
| 👏 | 51 | 4.78% | |
| 🔥 | 22 | 2.06% | |
| 😁 | 19 | 1.78% | |
| 🤪 | 19 | 1.78% | |
| 😢 | 17 | 1.59% | |
| 💩 | 10 | 0.938% | |
| 🤔 | 8 | 0.75% | |
| 🖕 | 5 | 0.469% | |
| 🤡 | 5 | 0.469% | |
| 🥴 | 4 | 0.375% | |
| 🫡 | 4 | 0.375% | |
| 🏆 | 3 | 0.281% | |
| ❤🔥 | 2 | 0.188% | |
| 🎃 | 2 | 0.188% | |
| 👎 | 2 | 0.188% | |
| 3 further kinds | 3 | 0.281% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,066reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 29 September 2024 to 28 August 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
We interviewed prominent Chinese academic Zhang Weiwei. He discussed how China’s government, political system, and socialist market economy actually work; and how China sees democracy, the USA, and Donald Trump’s trade war. https://geopoliticaleconomy.com/2025/08/25/china-model-zhang-weiwei-interview/
❤27👍19🔥3👏1😁1
Donald Trump has repeatedly threatened to forcibly annex Greenland, even though polls show that 85% of Greenlanders oppose this, and only 6% support it. What does the US empire want from trying to colonize Greenland? One, to restrict China's access to the Arctic region, as climate change melts ice and opens up new trade routes. And two, to exploit the territory’s natural resources, especially critical minerals, wh…
💯27🤬9❤5👍5👏2
The United States is the biggest arms dealer on Earth, responsible for 43% of the world’s weapons exports from 2020 to 2024. The US exported seven times more weapons than China, and five times more than Russia, in the past five years. https://geopoliticaleconomy.com/2025/03/13/us-top-weapons-exports-china-russia/
🤬34💯6🤮2🏆1
Donald Trump’s Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth is a fanatical self-declared “crusader” who believes the USA is in a “holy war” against China, the left, and Islam. “Communist China will fall”, he vowed in his 2020 book “American Crusade”, promising, “Israel and America will form an even tighter bond, fighting the scourge of Islamism and international leftism”. Hegseth heaped praise upon the medieval Crusaders, and he…
🤬23🤮16👍4🥴4😁4🫡1
The Ukraine “war is about money”, said US Senator Lindsey Graham, a close Trump ally. Noting Ukraine has trillions of dollars worth of critical minerals, he promised, “Donald Trump is going to do a deal to ... enrich ourselves with rare earth minerals”. https://geopoliticaleconomy.com/2024/11/27/ukraine-war-money-lindsey-graham-rare-earth-minerals/
💯24🤬7👏1💩1😁1😈1
Argentina’s libertarian President Javier Milei is promoting crypto scams and overseeing rapid deindustrialization. Manufacturing and construction are collapsing, while the financial sector, mining, and agriculture grow. The majority of Argentines live in poverty, but the stock market is booming. Meanwhile, Argentina's foreign policy is being made in Washington. https://geopoliticaleconomy.com/2025/02/28/javier-mi…
💯36🤬9👍4❤2
Big Tech oligarchs in Silicon Valley fear Chinese AI competitors like DeepSeek. Billionaire Donald Trump backer Peter Thiel admits they want monopolies, arguing that “competition is for losers”. The CEO of a major AI company, Anthropic, said the US must maintain a “unipolar world”. https://geopoliticaleconomy.com/2025/02/03/us-ai-monopoly-unipolar-world-china/
🤬27👍8💯6🔥2
Tech CEOs admit they want AI monopoly: US plans to block China's competition & 'steal' engineers https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4jniPAD2uoo
🤬23💯6🔥3🤡2👾1
US President Donald Trump invited Silicon Valley Big Tech billionaire oligarchs to be at the center of his inauguration. Elon Musk, Jeff Bezos, and Mark Zuckerberg symbolically sat with his cabinet picks. Apple CEO Tim Cook and Google chief Sundar Pichai were there too. https://geopoliticaleconomy.com/2025/01/21/big-tech-billionaires-trump-inauguration/
🤮21👍5🤔4🤬4🔥1
BRICS added as a new partner Nigeria, Africa’s most populous country, with the 6th-biggest population on Earth. BRICS+ now has 10 members and 9 partners, which make up 54.6% of the world population and 42.2% of global GDP (PPP). https://geopoliticaleconomy.com/2025/01/19/brics-expands-population-nigeria-africa/
👍37❤14👏6🤬1
Vivek Ramaswamy, the billionaire failed presidential candidate whom Donald Trump appointed to lead DOGE, the so-called “Department of Government Efficiency” (alongside the world's richest oligarch, Elon Musk), is a Martin Shkreli-style Wall Street speculator accused of running pump-and-dump schemes. https://geopoliticaleconomy.com/2024/12/27/vivek-ramaswamy-wall-street-pump-and-dump/
🤪19🤮16👍5💩5❤🔥2🔥2
BRICS keeps expanding, adding 9 partner countries in January 2025, after admitting 4 new members in 2024. It now makes up roughly half of the global population and more than 41% of world GDP (PPP). It’s an economic powerhouse, with top producers of key commodities like oil, gas, grains, meat, and minerals. https://geopoliticaleconomy.com/2024/12/25/brics-expands-9-partner-countries-population-economy/
❤36👍15👏6🤔1
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @GeopoliticalEconomy. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 638,979 of 1,481,243entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Geopolitical Economy Report” (@GeopoliticalEconomy), 2,558 subscribers as measured 16 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/GeopoliticalEconomy.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.