4 measurements spanning 11 days, net -10. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 3,387–3,400 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
17 Sept 2026, 01:59
3,388
-4
13 Sept 2026, 05:00
3,392
-6
9 Sept 2026, 11:56
3,398
no change
6 Sept 2026, 04:22
3,398
first reading
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 11 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
25.2%
avg views ÷ 3,388 subscribers
Avg views / post
853
8 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.05%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
8
of 20 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 2 September 2026
Posts held
20 (11 July 2026 – 2 September 2026)
Views total
6,824
Reactions total
140
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
6 Sept 2026, 04:22 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Reaction mix
421 reactions across 20 posts, in 14 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 45.6% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
👍
192
45.6%
❤
68
16.2%
🙏
67
15.9%
🤯
29
6.89%
👏
22
5.23%
👌
10
2.38%
🤩
9
2.14%
😱
7
1.66%
🔥
6
1.43%
😁
6
1.43%
🤬
2
0.475%
🎉
1
0.238%
😢
1
0.238%
🤔
1
0.238%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 421 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 11 July 2026 to 2 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
8
across the posts below
Posts paid on
6
of 20 we hold a reading for · 30%
Most on one post
2
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @Geo_Sentinel. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 20 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 11 July 2026 to 2 September 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
⚠️ La CNIL sanctionne à hauteur de 825 millions d'euros l'entreprise UBER
Imaginez : votre compte professionnel désactivé du jour au lendemain. Sans explication humaine. Juste un algorithme qui a décidé.
C'est exactement ce qui est arrivé à des milliers de chauffeurs Uber.
La CNIL, en coopération avec l'autorité néerlandaise, vient de faire sanctionner Uber B.V. et Uber Technologies Inc. à hauteur de 824 990 000 e…
🚨 19 extensions piégées repérées sur Chrome et Edge
Avez-vous vérifié la liste de vos extensions de navigateur récemment ?
Des chercheurs viennent d'identifier 19 extensions Chrome et Edge conçues pour une seule chose : vider vos portefeuilles de cryptomonnaies.
Certaines se faisaient passer pour de simples outils utilitaires.
D'autres imitaient des extensions légitimes déjà installées par des milliers de personn…
🌐 Brave lance les alias email
Vous avez déjà remarqué ces pubs qui vous suivent partout après une simple inscription sur un site ?
Une bonne partie du problème, c'est votre adresse email.
Google, Meta, LinkedIn et des dizaines d'autres s'en servent comme identifiant unique pour vous pister d'un site à l'autre, même sans cookies.
Votre email, c'est en fait un identifiant universel... et durable.
Brave vient de la…
Chrome est le navigateur le plus utilisé au monde.
C'est aussi l'un des outils de surveillance les plus efficaces que Google ait jamais créé.
Et c'est c'est difficile à expliqué aux gens parce que c'est assez technique, et la plupart des gens se disent juste "c'est qu'un navigateur de recherche" et ne comprennent pas l'ampleur de la surveillance.
Mais enfin, Proton vient de publier une vidéo, qui démontre point pa…
⚠️ ChatGPT a maintenant accès à vos iMessages
Voilà où on en est.
OpenAI vient de lancer un plugin qui donne à ChatGPT un accès direct à l'app Messages sur Mac : lecture de vos conversations, résumé, réponse automatique, et même envoi de messages en votre nom.
Pour l'instant réservé à ChatGPT Work et Codex. Mais on connaît la suite : ce qui est réservé aux comptes pro aujourd'hui arrive chez monsieur tout le monde…
🚨 Votre Wifi vous espionne chez vous
Oui, vous avez bien lu.
Comcast a activé une fonctionnalité de détection de mouvement, "Xfinity Shield", sur des millions de routeurs loués à ses abonnés. Discrètement. Sans grand tapage.
Le routeur capte les micro-variations du signal WiFi provoquées par vos déplacements dans le logement, et en déduit vos habitudes de présence.
Et le pire dans tout ça ? Une clause en petits ca…
🔍 Combien d'infos avez-vous confié à ChatGPT sans vous en rendre compte ?
Posez-vous la question sérieusement.
Vos problèmes de santé, votre situation financière, une engueulade avec un proche, un doute sur votre couple…
Tout ça, vous l'avez peut-être tapé un jour dans une conversation avec ChatGPT ou Claude, sans y penser deux fois.
Ces échanges ne disparaissent pas. Ils s'accumulent, silencieusement, conversati…
Vous êtes plus de 100 personnes à avoir téléchargé la fiche bonus en moins de 24 heures ! 😮
Bravo à tous ceux qui sont enfin passés à l'action 👏
J'espère que j'ai débloqué la situation le plus possible pour tous ceux qui se sentaient bloqués.
J'ai reçu beaucoup d'emails de votre part ces derniers jours, avec des questions sur la protection de vos données, votre configuration, vos choix d'outils, l'installation de …
Les résultats du sondage sont sans appel.
La majorité d'entre vous veut quitter les emails non-sécurisés, mais la migration fait peur, ou vous ne savez pas par où commencer.
J'ai entendu le message.
J'ai préparé une fiche bonus spécialement pour vous : "Migrer vers un email sécurisé"
C'est le guide complet, étape par étape, pour tout le monde. Écrit pour quelqu'un qui ne se considère pas à l'aise avec l'informati…
Je regarde régulièrement la liste des abonnés qui ont télécharger ma fiche offerte (vous êtes déjà plus de 500, bravo à tous ceux qui sont passés à l'action) et quelque chose me surprend toujours. 🤔
Je vois encore beaucoup d'adresses @gmail.com, @yahoo.fr, @laposte.net, @free.fr...
Et ça m'interpelle, parce que si vous êtes ici, vous savez très bien ce que ces services font de vos données.
Gmail lit le contenu de …
Au cas où vous seriez passés à côté : les impôts français viennent de se faire pirater 🇫🇷👻
678 000 contribuables concernés.
Données fiscales, informations personnelles, identifiants, tout est parti sur le dark web et est en train d'être revendu en ce moment même.
Oui oui, le même gouvernement qui insiste pour que vous envoyez votre pièce d'identité à tout prix, pour "défendre les enfants", vient de se faire hacker…
🤯10👍5❤2🙏2👌1
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @Geo_Sentinel. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Polls
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
📩 Vous utilisez encore Gmail, Yahoo, La Poste, Free ou autre email non sécurisé. Pourquoi ?
La migration me semble trop compliquée (et je suis plutôt nul en informatique)22%
J'ai trop de comptes liés à cet email et ça va me prendre un temps fou de tout migrer33%
Je ne sais pas par où commencer8%
Honnêtement, je ne savais pas que c'était un problème et je pensais que ces emails étaient corrects6%
Je le ferai... un jour5%
Je ne vois pas l'urgence, j'ai le temps0%
Je ne sais pas quelle alternative choisir12%
Je ne suis pas concerné, j'ai déjà fait ma migration vers un email sécurisé (Proton, Tuta ou autre)14%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 11 July 2026 to 2 September 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
InfoDefenseFRANCE 1 @infodefenseFRreserve · 28,602 Telegram ranks this channel #33 of 69 here — alongside 68 others — read 9 September 2026
BRICS TV ( FRANCE ) @BRICSTV · 25,977 Telegram ranks this channel #46 of 69 here — alongside 68 others — read 13 September 2026
KOMPЯOMAT @kompromatmedia_2 · 31,321 Telegram ranks this channel #50 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 6 September 2026
Prozorov en français @prozorov_fr · 24,258 Telegram ranks this channel #60 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 16 September 2026
EurasianForm @eurasianform · 26,241 Telegram ranks this channel #63 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 13 September 2026
La Nouvelle Donne 🔔 @lanouvelledonne · 22,503 Telegram ranks this channel #64 of 68 here — alongside 67 others — read 20 September 2026
This channel appears in 6 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“GEOSENTINEL” (@Geo_Sentinel), 3,388 subscribers as measured 17 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Geo_Sentinel.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.