Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

General Michael Flynn ️

@GeneralMichaeIFlynn

On this record: Topic · Observations · Also posting the same content · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

2,909subscribers

-6 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001317495380
TypeChannel
Username@GeneralMichaeIFlynn
Created20 August 2021measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live10 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 10 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/GeneralMichaeIFlynn

Topic

Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 51% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Observations

These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.

Content that also appears on other registered channels

Posts published here appear word for word on 1 other registered channel. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegram’s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.

Matching posts — open both and compare (6 of the pairs behind the counts below)
Posted firstThenOverlapGap
@BradBartonReal/14397 Apr 2026, 20:10 UTC@GeneralMichaeIFlynn/800 · this entry7 Apr 2026, 20:12 UTC1.002 minutes
@BradBartonReal/14408 Apr 2026, 19:58 UTC@GeneralMichaeIFlynn/801 · this entry8 Apr 2026, 20:00 UTC1.002 minutes
@BradBartonReal/144215 Apr 2026, 21:35 UTC@GeneralMichaeIFlynn/804 · this entry15 Apr 2026, 21:37 UTC1.002 minutes
@BradBartonReal/142910 Feb 2026, 18:26 UTC@GeneralMichaeIFlynn/792 · this entry10 Feb 2026, 18:26 UTC1.00under a minute
@BradBartonReal/14372 Apr 2026, 18:19 UTC@GeneralMichaeIFlynn/798 · this entry2 Apr 2026, 18:23 UTC0.994 minutes
@BradBartonReal/144110 Apr 2026, 16:58 UTC@GeneralMichaeIFlynn/803 · this entry10 Apr 2026, 21:46 UTC0.994.8 hours
Every channel this entry shares post bodies with
ChannelMatching postsText overlapTypical gapPublished first
@BradBartonReal8 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.002 minutes@BradBartonReal (80)

Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp — in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.

What this cannot establish

MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.

Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. None of the 8 matches recorded here fall after that date, so for this entry we cannot say whether any of them carried a credit. The duplication is measured; the absence of attribution is not.

“Published first” means first in this corpus. We hold 19 comparable posts for this entry, running 7 November 2025 to 20 April 2026. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.

The detector’s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.

  • Verbatim republication has three causes and the text separates only two: a clone/mirror, unattributed copy-paste, or BOTH channels copying a common third source that neither attributes. The spread filter (content held by at most 8 channels) reduces the third and does not remove it.
  • 'Earliest' means earliest IN THIS CORPUS. A channel ingested one page deep will look younger than a neighbour ingested in full; corpus_coverage above is there to be checked before the direction is believed.
  • shared_verified_est extrapolates the sampled pass rate over the full narrow match count; sampled/passed are the numbers actually measured.
  • Absence of a forward header is not proof of intent: Telegram lets a channel disable forward attribution, and a credit written in the body is not parsed as attribution here (mention_edge_either_way above is the closest available signal).

Across the whole group of 2, the earliest publisher we hold is @BradBartonReal. That is a statement about our reading window, not a claim of authorship.

Recorded under the key clone_copy, last confirmed 7 August 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.

Also posting the same content

This channel’s posts match, word for word or near enough, posts on 1 other registered channel, found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register. That matching has been checked by hand against the live Telegram pages and found reliable — 0 wrong of 45 pairs re-read.

Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown. The same hand-check found that reading wrong 18 of 45 times — 60%, no better than a coin flip — because it depends on how deep our own crawl happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Word-for-word matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.

Growth

2,9092,9152,9126 August 2026 — 2,915 subscribers6 August 2026 — 2,915 subscribers10 August 2026 — 2,909 subscribers6 August 202610 August 2026
3 measurements spanning 4 days, net -6. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 2,908–2,916 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
10 Aug 2026, 10:032,909-6
6 Aug 2026, 11:032,915no change
6 Aug 2026, 09:422,915first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 7 November 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 20 April 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
5m 09s
Average length
1m 17s

Measured directly from 4 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

210 reactions across 20 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 45.7% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
9645.7%
👍4421.0%
🔥3918.6%
👏136.19%
🫡104.76%
🤡31.43%
😱20.952%
🙏20.952%
😁10.476%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 210reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 7 November 2025 to 20 April 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

20 Apr 2026, 20:23 UTC437 views7 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Your Account has been locked ❌ Your Account 📱 has been locked for suspicious activity. If you think this was a mistake, please click below immediately. 👉 CONFIRM ACCOUNT 👈 👉 CONFIRM ACCOUNT 👈 👉 CONFIRM ACCOUNT 👈

4🔥2👏1

20 Apr 2026, 01:09 UTC428 views12 reactionsread 7 August 2026

🔻 They called him crazy. They blacklisted him. They destroyed his career. They banned him from every studio in Hollywood. Because he told the truth. Mel Gibson just named 13 of them. Tech billionaires. Politicians. Hollywood executives. Names that have been protected for decades. 320 MILLION VIEWS IN 48 HOURS. Read that again. 320 million. The algorithm couldn't suppress it. The fact-checkers couldn't bury it.

7👍3🔥2

17 Apr 2026, 18:08 UTC326 views9 reactionsread 7 August 2026

🟢 CONFIRM YOUR ACCOUNT 🟢 We are removing all the BOTS from our Channels. Please CLICK BELOW to CONFIRM that you're not a BOT. It's easy and it only takes 2 clicks. CONFIRM ACCOUNT CONFIRM ACCOUNT CONFIRM ACCOUNT

👍43🔥2

15 Apr 2026, 21:37 UTC339 views9 reactionsread 7 August 2026

🔻 The panic in Washington is deafening. They want you watching the blockade. They want you watching the Middle East. The real war is inside Congress right now. Pam Bondi refused to testify. The media says she's hiding. No. She is protecting the ledger. The Oversight Committee doesn't want truth. They want to know exactly what evidence the White House has — so they can destroy it. She didn't defy a subpoena. She

4🔥2🫡2👏1

10 Apr 2026, 21:46 UTC330 views14 reactionsread 7 August 2026

🔻 THE FIRST LADY OF THE UNITED STATES JUST STOOD IN THE WHITE HOUSE AND SAID HIS NAME. Epstein. From the podium. On camera. To the world. “The lies linking me with the disgraceful Jeffrey Epstein need to end today.” Read that line one more time. Not what she said. What she didn’t say. She didn’t say the files are fake. She didn’t say the names are wrong. She didn’t defend anyone else on the list. She defended O

🔥65🤡2👍1

8 Apr 2026, 20:00 UTC276 views11 reactionsread 7 August 2026

🔻 THEY SIGNED. 38 days. That’s all it took. The regime that burned American flags for 45 years just put pen to paper and begged for mercy. Read that again. ⟁ He gave them a deadline. Tuesday. 8 PM. They laughed. They said no. They said “permanent end or nothing.” 24 hours later — they signed. THAT’S NOT DIPLOMACY. THAT’S DOMINATION. ⟁ They will tell you Pakistan brokered it. They will tell you it was a “mut

5👍2🫡2👏1🤡1

7 Apr 2026, 20:12 UTC251 views7 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Four Organizations All Founded in 1913 FED - Federal Reserve FBI - Federal Bureau of Investigation IRS - Internal Revenue Service ADL- Anti Defamation League No coincidences ⛔️ We are clearing out FAKE ACCOUNTS. CONFIRM you're real by verifying your official account. Just tap below – it's 100% FREE. ⚠️ ➡️ CONFIRM ACCOUNT 📱 ➡️ CONFIRM ACCOUNT 📱

4🔥2👍1

7 Apr 2026, 01:00 UTC262 views6 reactionsread 7 August 2026

🟢 CONFIRM YOUR ACCOUNT 🟢 We are removing all the BOTS from our Channels. Please CLICK BELOW to CONFIRM that you're not a BOT. It's easy and it only takes 2 clicks. 👉 CONFIRM YOUR ACCOUNT 📱 👉 CONFIRM YOUR ACCOUNT 📱

3🔥2👍1

2 Apr 2026, 18:23 UTC389 views13 reactionsread 7 August 2026

WORLDWIDE BLACKOUT COMING: TRUMP GIVES THE GO-AHEAD FOR A HUGE GLOBAL MILITARY OPERATION WITH EBS ACTIVATION—THOUSANDS OF ELITES SET TO BE ARRESTED! President Donald J. Trump has given the final go-ahead for a historic global military operation as the world stands on the edge of the greatest awakening ever. This will turn on the Emergency Broadcast System and take down the whole deep state cabal. People who know say

7👍2🫡2🔥1😁1

17 Mar 2026, 18:12 UTC431 views13 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video

Guantanamo Bay just expanded 🍿🐸 Nothing can stop what’s coming… Follow 👉🏻 https://t.me/GeneralMichaeIFlynn

6👍3🔥2🫡2

16 Mar 2026, 14:23 UTC391 views11 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Do you know how many articles I have of the currency revaluation? You thought that was the only one? By the way Institutions like JPMorgan, Bank of America, Wells Fargo, and Citibank, which have expanded into tokenized deposits and stablecoin issuance under GENIUS Act rules, will facilitate exchanges. Their systems now support programmable, blockchain-linked settlements for digital assets, including tokenized fore

👍4🔥43

15 Mar 2026, 22:54 UTC344 views11 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video

The teeth that come and go in the video of Netanyahu are what make it seem like a deepfake AI. BE READY, THE NEXT DROP WILL BE SHOCKING 👇 https://t.me/GeneralMichaeIFlynn

👍72😱2

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @GeneralMichaeIFlynn. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 875,857 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“General Michael Flynn ️” (@GeneralMichaeIFlynn), 2,909 subscribers as measured 10 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/GeneralMichaeIFlynn.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.