Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Generasi Pembebas Al-Aqsa (GenPAQ)

Channel

Generasi Pembebas Al-Aqsa (GenPAQ)

@GenPAQ

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

2,079subscribers

-11 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001185849466
TypeChannel
Username@GenPAQ
CreatedBetween 1 March 2018 and 31 July 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live15 August 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged2 times, most recently 15 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/GenPAQ

Growth

2,0792,0902,084.56 August 2026 — 2,090 subscribers6 August 2026 — 2,090 subscribers9 August 2026 — 2,086 subscribers12 August 2026 — 2,079 subscribers6 August 202612 August 2026
4 measurements spanning 6 days, net -11. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 2,077–2,092 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Aug 2026, 08:472,079-7
9 Aug 2026, 07:542,086-4
6 Aug 2026, 06:182,090no change
6 Aug 2026, 03:502,090first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 4 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
65.3%
avg views ÷ 2,079 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,360
11 posts measured
Reaction rate
this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window
11
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 4 August 2026
Posts held20 (4 July 20264 August 2026)
Views total14,925
Reactions total
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken7 Aug 2026, 16:59 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
22m 57s
Average length
1m 46s

Measured directly from 13 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

7 reactions across 2 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 57.1% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🤬457.1%
👍342.9%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 2 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 7reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 4 July 2026 to 4 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

4 Aug 2026, 04:02 UTC788 viewsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Hamas Setuju Lucut Senjata? Adakah benar Hamas bersetuju melucutkan seluruh senjatanya, atau dakwaan itu telah disalah tafsir? Mengapa Benjamin Netanyahu masih enggan menerima cadangan tersebut walaupun ia digelar sebagai "perjanjian bersejarah"? Apakah syarat sebenar yang dipersetujui oleh Hamas, dan syarat apa pula yang dituntut Israel sehingga rundingan terus menemui jalan buntu? Baca analisis penuh untuk mema

31 Jul 2026, 14:17 UTC≈1,640 viewsread 7 August 2026
Video

Perjanjian Abraham: Daripada Penyelewengan Agama kepada Pemerkasaan Projek Zionis Perjanjian Abraham sering dipersembahkan sebagai usaha membawa keamanan di Asia Barat. Namun, adakah ia sekadar perjanjian diplomatik, atau sebenarnya membawa implikasi yang jauh lebih besar terhadap Palestin, dunia Islam dan masa depan projek Zionis? Dalam episod terbaru Aqsa Syarif Podcast, kami mengupas isu ini daripada sudut al-Qu

31 Jul 2026, 03:45 UTC≈1,480 viewsread 7 August 2026
Video

Bagaimana Yahudi menguasai dunia? Dalam episod terbaru ini, kami meneliti latar sejarah bangsa Yahudi, idea-idea yang sering dibincangkan, dan membezakan antara fakta, tafsiran serta dakwaan yang beredar di ruang awam. 📺 Nantikan siaran episod terbaru Aqsa Syarif. Jangan lepaskan perbincangan yang mengupas isu ini secara lebih menyeluruh dan berasaskan sumber. Malam ini jam 10 hanya di YT Aqsa Syarif Subscribe un

30 Jul 2026, 04:56 UTC844 viewsread 7 August 2026
Video

Pilihan raya Israel semakin hampir. Tinjauan pendapat terkini menunjukkan Benjamin Netanyahu berdepan cabaran besar untuk mengekalkan kuasa, dengan peluangnya bergantung kepada kemampuan membentuk gabungan yang mampu meraih majoriti di Knesset. Dalam suasana politik yang semakin sengit, operasi ketenteraan Israel di Gaza terus dipergiatkan. Penganalisis melihat tindakan ini sebagai usaha kerajaan Netanyahu memperkuk

28 Jul 2026, 03:27 UTC903 viewsread 7 August 2026
Video

Perang Amerika-Iran bukanlah baru bermula tahun ini. Ia telah melalui beberapa pusingan sejak beberapa tahun lalu. Namun, apa yang membezakan konflik tahun ini berbanding 2024 dan 2025 ialah serangan balas Iran tidak lagi tertumpu kepada Israel atau aset Amerika semata-mata, sebaliknya turut menyasarkan beberapa negara Arab yang menjadi lokasi pangkalan tentera dan kepentingan strategik Amerika. Sepanjang kira-kira

27 Jul 2026, 08:48 UTC≈1,300 viewsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Siapakah sebenarnya Syaikh Faruq Ramadan? Bagaimana seorang petani dan syaikh di Nablus berjaya merampas senjata seorang anggota Zionis sehingga mengorbankan dua anggota tentera berpangkat tinggi? Di manakah insiden ini berlaku? Siapakah dua anggota tentera yang terbunuh, dan mengapa identiti mereka begitu penting? Mengapa kerajaan Netanyahu bertindak pantas merobohkan rumah Syaikh Faruq serta mengetatkan kawalan d

24 Jul 2026, 14:15 UTC≈2,560 viewsread 7 August 2026

MENGAPA IRAN SERANG NEGARA TELUK, TAK SERANG ISRAEL? KETUA BAHARU HAMAS, ON HAFIZ BATAL LESEN NETWORK SCHOOL | S2EP23 Pusingan perang Amerika Syarikat-Iran kembali memuncak melebihi hari ke-10. Pada masa sama, Malaysia menjadi perhatian antarabangsa susulan tindakan berani membatalkan sebuah projek yang dikaitkan dengan Zionis di Johor. Turut menjadi tumpuan ialah pemilihan ketua baharu Hamas serta pelbagai lagi pe

23 Jul 2026, 13:53 UTC≈1,300 viewsread 7 August 2026
Video

🔥 Kalau Network School ini tak viral, adakah ia masih boleh beroperasi? 🇲🇾 Adakah Balaji sebenarnya mahu membina "negara sendiri" di dalam Malaysia? 🇺🇸 Kenapa negara-negara Arab begitu takut kepada Amerika Syarikat dan Benjamin Netanyahu? 💥 Serta pelbagai lagi kupasan isu geopolitik dan perkembangan semasa yang hangat minggu ini. 📺 Nantikan episod penuh Jumaat (esok), jam 10.00 malam di YouTube Aqsa Syarif. http

23 Jul 2026, 08:46 UTC≈1,210 viewsread 7 August 2026
Photo

al-Hayyah, Abu Syuhada. Mengapa Khalil al-Hayyah dipilih memimpin Hamas? Bagaimana rejim Zionis melihat pelantikan beliau? Mengapa beliau digelar Abu Syuhada selepas kehilangan empat orang anak dalam perjuangan? Apakah mesej utama dalam ucapan sulungnya sebagai pemimpin baharu, dan apakah cabaran serta jangkaan yang bakal dihadapinya pada masa hadapan? Ikuti analisis penuh mengenai tokoh yang kini memimpin Hamas s

21 Jul 2026, 07:19 UTC≈1,430 viewsread 7 August 2026
Video

MoU Trump Hanyalah Muslihat Perjanjian Amerika-Iran untuk menamatkan perang selama 60 hari yang digelar sebagai MoU dilaporkan telah berakhir, berdasarkan kenyataan Donald Trump sendiri. Namun, pengkritik melihat perjanjian itu sekadar helah untuk meredakan kemarahan masyarakat antarabangsa serta memulihkan keadaan ekonomi. Pada masa sama, ada juga yang berpendapat perjanjian tersebut terlalu memihak kepada kepent

20 Jul 2026, 07:54 UTC≈1,470 viewsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Saudi menyerang Yaman, Iran berperang dengan negara-negara Teluk, Mesir dan UAE membantu rejim Zionis menjajah Gaza, Syria dan Lubnan pula tanpa henti diserang oleh rejim Zionis. Terbaharu, Maghribi dilaporkan bakal menghantar tenteranya ke Gaza (untuk membantu IDF) dan pelbagai lagi perkembangan seumpamanya. Apakah sebenarnya yang sedang berlaku di Asia Barat? Hampir semua negara Islam di Asia Barat terlibat dalam

17 Jul 2026, 14:27 UTC≈1,940 viewsread 7 August 2026
Video

PROJEK ZIONIS DI FOREST CITY, PERANG SAUDI-YAMAN & AMERIKA SERANG IRAN SEMULA | S2EP22 Isu dalam negara semakin mendapat perhatian, manakala ketegangan di Asia Barat pula terus memuncak. Adakah semua perkembangan ini berlaku secara berasingan, atau sebenarnya saling berkait dalam percaturan geopolitik dunia? Tambahan, hampir seminggu Amerika dan Iran berbalas serangan, masih gencatan senjata atau telah mula semula

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @GenPAQ. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 40,087 of 1,481,243entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Nadir Al-Nuri
@nadiralnuri · 217,168
Telegram ranks this channel #46 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 13 August 2026

This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Generasi Pembebas Al-Aqsa (GenPAQ)” (@GenPAQ), 2,079 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/GenPAQ.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.