Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for GemHUB_Protocol_KOR

Supergroup

GemHUB_Protocol_KOR

@GemHUB_Protocol

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Citations · Cite this entry

2,051members

-106 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

36 online right now

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001749365155
TypeSupergroup
Username@GemHUB_Protocol
Description젬허브 프로젝트(GHUB Token)는 차세대 블록체인 소셜 플랫폼 팝플러스(Poplus)에서 활용되는 핵심 유틸리티 토큰으로, 사용자 참여를 기반으로 한 지속가능한 디지털 생태계 구축을 목표로 합니다. 공지채널 https://t.me/GemHUB_Protocol_official
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded20 September 2026
Last confirmed live20 September 2026
Measurements held13
On Telegramt.me/GemHUB_Protocol

Topic

Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 20 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 69% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

2,0512,1572,1047 August 2026 — 2,157 members10 August 2026 — 2,153 members14 August 2026 — 2,149 members17 August 2026 — 2,135 members24 August 2026 — 2,127 members27 August 2026 — 2,122 members30 August 2026 — 2,124 members2 September 2026 — 2,119 members7 September 2026 — 2,115 members11 September 2026 — 2,107 members15 September 2026 — 2,092 members19 September 2026 — 2,051 members20 September 2026 — 2,051 members7 August 202620 September 2026
13 measurements spanning 44 days, net -106. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 2,035–2,173 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every members count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)MembersChange
20 Sept 2026, 02:502,051no change
19 Sept 2026, 01:202,051-41
15 Sept 2026, 00:412,092-15
11 Sept 2026, 15:572,107-8
7 Sept 2026, 04:402,115-4
2 Sept 2026, 19:542,119-5
30 Aug 2026, 09:242,124+2
27 Aug 2026, 20:032,122-5
24 Aug 2026, 09:352,127-8
17 Aug 2026, 19:232,135-14
14 Aug 2026, 13:352,149-4
10 Aug 2026, 23:262,153-4
7 Aug 2026, 01:012,157first reading

Engagement

Posts not read yet. This entry is on the register from its profile alone; the post reader has not reached it. Engagement figures appear here once posts have actually been measured — we do not publish a rate before we have the readings behind it.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 20 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“GemHUB_Protocol_KOR” (@GemHUB_Protocol), 2,051 members as measured 20 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/GemHUB_Protocol.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.