I was among the first caller to call this! Called at 6k mcap now at 1.2M. 200X if you aped! Congratz to diamond hands! By @GarfieldGambles

Channel
Garfield's Gambles
@GarfieldGambles
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
20subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001650865882 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @GarfieldGambles |
| Description | Don't underestimate @GarfieldVisionaire |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 25 April 2022— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 11 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 11 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/GarfieldGambles |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 11 Aug 2026, 15:31 | 20 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 05:28 | 20 | first reading |
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 25 April 2022 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 8 May 2022. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- 10
- Links
- 32
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 11 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Reaction mix
10 reactions across 8 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 70.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🔥 | 7 | 70.0% | |
| 👍 | 3 | 30.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 8 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 10reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 25 April 2022 to 8 May 2022, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
BSC: I've aped this at 6k mcap. Extremely low cap but just calling incase it moons. Moon or dust! MuuInu - 6k https://poocoin.app/tokens/0xea5e9f39f4b4bc2684e49a0e43127f7f6f6be3b8 https://t.me/MuuInu
BSC: This one is launching in any seconds! From a good dev. Very hyped so time your entry. https://t.me/SpoinkInu
Called at 3k mcap, hit 86k at ATH now sitting at 50k. FAT 27X if you aped at my call! @GarfieldGambles
BSC: I've aped this at 3k, calling this only cuz of the bullish name. Extremely risky play, very low mcap and jus launched. Place your bets. GucciDoge - 3k mcap https://poocoin.app/tokens/0x17007ef4674e39aa621eaab10158d3ddc99dd933 https://t.me/GucciDogePortal
Hope you held this one, called at 7k mcap hit 144K at ATH. Nice 21X from my call! We are printing everyday! 👀 From @GarfieldGambles
BSC: I've aped SmartChainApesNFT at 7k mcap, team is safe but it's a degen play. Dev will push if community get behind. NFA SmartChainApesNFT - 7k https://t.me/SmartChainApesNFT https://poocoin.app/tokens/0xb15442174b3788be995188fcaa75f5fe9158cc76
👍1
Not much going on right now so here's a upcoming launch from Ratking! I'd recommend to wait for the first dip before aping anything. https://t.me/MysterylaunchRatking
🔥1
My god, look at that beautiful chart! Called at 2k mcap now at 83k! That's a 41X from call! @GarfieldGambles
Posted at 2k mcap, now sitting at 32k! Nice 16X from call! Hope you aped!
🔥2
Just hit 10k! 5X from signal and chart is looking pretty good. @GarfieldGambles
BSC: I've aped this at 2k mcap, could send hard tomorrow but still a degen play, moon or dust. Eid Mubarak - 2k https://poocoin.app/tokens/0x8db66ab256f20d90dabcc7de38ac37bd7b6c07f4 https://t.me/eidmubarak_bsc
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @GarfieldGambles. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
- Dead references
- 6
- handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
- Evidenced gone
- 0
- we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
- Never seen alive
- 6
- vacant every time we have ever looked
@GarfieldGambles named 6 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
named in 1 post, 12 August 2026 – 12 August 2026
named in 1 post, 12 August 2026 – 12 August 2026
named in 1 post, 12 August 2026 – 12 August 2026
named in 1 post, 12 August 2026 – 12 August 2026
named in 1 post, 12 August 2026 – 12 August 2026
named in 1 post, 12 August 2026 – 12 August 2026
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Garfield's Gambles” (@GarfieldGambles), 20 subscribers as measured 11 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/GarfieldGambles.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.