Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

$MEME Trends

@GambleTrend

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry

99subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003433225271
TypeChannel
Username@GambleTrend
Description📰We cover news, narratives, and key movements in the $TON meme ecosystem - everything that shapes the market and community attention. Chat: @GambleTraders Founder: @DMeyson
CreatedBetween 1 November 2025 and 31 March 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded9 August 2026
Last confirmed live9 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/GambleTrend

Growth

996 August 2026 — 99 subscribers9 August 2026 — 99 subscribers6 August 20269 August 2026
2 measurements spanning 3 days. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 98–100 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
9 Aug 2026, 11:0299no change
6 Aug 2026, 17:4999first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 27 June 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
78.8%
avg views ÷ 99 subscribers
Avg views / post
78.0
2 posts measured
Reaction rate
12.8%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
2
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 18 July 2026
Posts held20 (27 June 202618 July 2026)
Views total156
Reactions total20
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken9 Aug 2026, 11:02 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
13
Links
3

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 9 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Reaction mix

164 reactions across 19 posts, in 22 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 26.2% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍4326.2%
🔥4225.6%
😁159.15%
🤣127.32%
84.88%
🤡74.27%
🐳63.66%
🥴63.66%
😢42.44%
💅31.83%
😐31.83%
💯21.22%
🤬21.22%
🤷‍♂21.22%
🫡21.22%
👀10.61%
🕊10.61%
😨10.61%
😭10.61%
🙏10.61%
2 further kinds21.22%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 164reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 27 June 2026 to 18 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

18 Jul 2026, 08:35 UTC73 views12 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

$SixSeven - Кликеры всё еще платят? 👀 Не так давно появилась новая кликер-апка — 67 6️⃣ Смысл уже знаком: тренды дают о себе знать. Ничего кардинально нового замечено не было — кликай, выполняй задания, кидай кубик в чате и получай за это коины. Сам токен для будущих выводов был создан еще месяц назад — 16 июня. Сейчас его FDV составляет около $12 млн, при этом монету продолжают активно покупать крупными сделками.

🔥7👍2🤷‍♂2😁1

17 Jul 2026, 11:21 UTC83 views8 reactionsread 9 August 2026

📉$GRAM - $1.4. Где же $MTONGA? Сообщество яростно бушует в сторону Дурова из за очередного дна $GRAM, времена ныне хуже чем до расформирования «TON Foundation» пишут лидеры мнения. Тем временем дедлайны Дурова в очередной раз были просрочены: Выполнение 4го шага $MTONGA занимало около 2-3 недель, 5ый шаг должен был появиться еще более 2х недель назад. Сообщество в недоумении. Токен $MTONGA реагирует подобающе, цен

🔥4😁3🤯1

12 Jul 2026, 22:01 UTC387 views8 reactionsread 9 August 2026

Объемы на DEX в блокчейне снова ушли в абсолютную спячку в виде 2 миллионов долларов за сутки, из которых около 40% это пара GRAM/USDT. В связи с этим и нет ничего нового и интересного связанного с любимыми коинами. Ждем лучших времен и новостей. Мы на связи 🤝 🇬🇧ENG: DEX trading volume on the blockchain has once again fallen into a deep sleep, dropping to just $2 million over the past 24 hours. Around 40% of that

😢4👍3🕊1

8 Jul 2026, 11:35 UTC391 views8 reactionsread 9 August 2026

Все хрюки должны быть сожжены! 🔥 В одной из Приваток увидел сообщение от Rocket Man’а в котором он написал текст выше. Rocket Man - Владелец и основатель проекта @Xrocket к которому так же причастен токен $XROCK (Утилитарный токен экосистемы) и NFT коллекция Rocket cosmonaut. Учитывая его статус, подобные сообщения редко появляются просто так. Не исключено, что это намёк или своеобразный инсайд, который может прив

🔥5👍2🤩1

7 Jul 2026, 15:56 UTC278 views11 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

Верующие в мемы бунтуют! Такими темпами можно предположить, что при полноценном мем-сезоне начнётся PvP между сообществом Гифтов и Мемок на TON. ⚔️ 🇬🇧ENG: The meme believers are rebelling! ⚔️ It’s possible that once a full-blown meme season kicks off, we’ll witness a true PvP battle between the TON Gifts community and the TON Memes community… 👍— Memes will always be better. @GambleTrend

👍6😁3🫡2

6 Jul 2026, 11:37 UTC246 views12 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Video

1 пост — и золотые горы превращаются в фантики 📉 Еще пару дней назад был запущен токен $CRASH, посвященный крупному X-инфлюенсеру, который активно взаимодействует с мемами на TON. Токен рос буквально не по часам, а по минутам. Уже через час после запуска его капитализация превысила 100k и продолжала обновлять новые ATH. Но всё закончилось в тот момент, когда Crash решил публично высказаться о токене: В своем посте

🥴6😁3🤣2😨1

4 Jul 2026, 21:21 UTC158 views8 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

Рагеры снова проснулись! 👁‍🗨 За последние две недели всё чаще появляются «авторские» токены, якобы запущенные известными инфлюенсерами, хотя на самом деле они не имеют к ним никакого отношения. 🍽Схема проста: скамеры покупают Telegram-каналы с 4 000+ подписчиков, полностью копируют оформление, стиль и посты настоящих инфлюенсеров, а затем запускают фейковый «официальный» токен, сопровождая это громкими анонсами в п

🤡6🤬2

4 Jul 2026, 14:05 UTC196 views12 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

$63,000 в мемкоины на TON? 😲 Около 8 часов назад неизвестный кит-кошелек совершил серию крупных покупок: сначала приобрел $CHERRY на 10,000 GRAM, затем $YODA на аналогичную сумму, а после докупил $UTYA еще на 15,000 GRAM. Кто стоит за этим кошельком и что стало причиной таких покупок — неизвестно. Однако подобные сделки на столь крупные суммы нередко говорят о приближающихся объемах. Любопытно, что $GRAM уже вырос

🔥6🐳4💯2

3 Jul 2026, 12:45 UTC140 views10 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

TON активно поддерживает мемы! Это знак? 🐂 Совсем недавно официальный аккаунт TON Blockchain ответил на пост крупного крипто-инфлюенсера Джейка, в котором он упомянул токен $UTYA и заявил, что в будущем тот способен достичь капитализации в $1B. Спустя всего 15 минут аккаунт TON Blockchain, на который подписано более 2 миллионов человек, отреагировал на этот пост GIF со знаменитой уткой. Такие взаимодействия лишь п

👍54🙏1

2 Jul 2026, 18:32 UTC102 views9 reactionsread 9 August 2026

Новая мета мемкоинов? 🤑 Последние несколько дней на лаунчпадах активно появляются мем-токены, посвящённые различным фондам. Всё началось с $InternFund. После того как TG-Интерн поделился адресом своего кошелька, сообщество начало массово отправлять ему комиссии, заработанные с токена $INTERNFUND, напрямую на его кошелёк. Однако после того, как TG-Интерн начал продавать полученные токены, часть сообщества воспринял

👍4🔥31🤡1

1 Jul 2026, 14:02 UTC327 views10 reactionsread 9 August 2026

Teddie в группе $GM Буквально только что автор канала @goodies и кит Тедди присоединился в официальный чат токена $GM Teddie - Король Стикер-токенов. Он активно занимался отправкой токенов на очень высокие капитализации. Одни из таких: $EGOR, $YODA, $ZHGUN. Неужели, $GM следующий миллионник? С каждым днем данный нарратив поддерживается все большими медийными личностями. 🇬🇧ENG: 🧸 Teddie Joined the $GM Chat Just m

🔥7👍2🐳1

30 Jun 2026, 20:48 UTC87 views3 reactionsread 9 August 2026

Отныне вы можете отправлять интересные новости в личные сообщения в канала. Спасибо каждому за поддержку и помощь в канале! @GambleTrend

3

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @GambleTrend. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 268,789 of 1,336,469entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“$MEME Trends” (@GambleTrend), 99 subscribers as measured 9 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/GambleTrend.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.