Telegram必备的搜索引擎,极搜JISOU帮你精准找到,想要的群组、频道、视频、音乐 👉 t.me/jisou2?start=a_7597049464

Channel
吃瓜热点搞笑段子
@GXDZ99
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
4,321subscribers
-306 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1003080062339 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @GXDZ99 |
| Created | Between 1 August 2025 and 31 October 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 11 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 11 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/GXDZ99 |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 11 Aug 2026, 16:12 | 4,321 | -286 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 19:44 | 4,607 | -20 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 19:48 | 4,627 | first reading |
Engagement
47 posts held, back to 7 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 4 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 0.292%
- avg views ÷ 4,321 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 12.6
- 47 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- —
- this channel exposes no reaction counts
- Posts in window
- 47
- of 47 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 8 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 47 (7 August 2026 – 8 August 2026) |
| Views total | 592 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 8 Aug 2026, 17:48 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Video runtime
- 15m 24s
- Average length
- 42s
Measured directly from 22 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Recent posts
要不比赛打飞机吧🌚
🌚🌚无聊🙄
😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀 😀【7T.COM】全球公认最稳! 😀只要您是【85.net】玩家,VIP1:1平移,17,7777转移彩金。 😀新会员首三存【7,777彩金】。 😀老虎机【返水1.3%】起,无上限。 😀😀😀😀:【7T.COM】 😀😀😀😀:【@SVIP7T_bot】 😀😀😀😀:【@uuu7t】
😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀 😀【9G.COM】首周100%包赢,亏损全额返还! 😀 新人首周0风险体验!亏损由平台全额承担! 😀 最高可领 1,999U,盈利全归你! 😀 赢了全部是你的,输了平台买单! 😀 全网召集【老玩家入驻】VIP等级1:1平移 😀 全网召集【老玩家入驻】19,9999U转移彩金! 😀实力派平台,强者首选! 😀无论输赢,您都有退路!这才是您应得的保障。 😀立即加入,畅享0风险体验,赢取😀😀😀😀😀大奖! 😀😀😀😀 9G.COM 😀😀😀😀 9G飞投 😀😀😀😀 @TGKF9G
莫斯科谢列梅捷沃国际机场,一名搭乘俄罗斯航空航班的乘客因误机而闯入停机坪,据悉该事件发生在7月25日。
网传新疆存在强迫劳动完全是西方编造的谎言。 新疆棉花采收机械化率极高,各族群众进厂务工、采摘棉花都是自愿就业,签订正规劳动合同,依法获取报酬、享受社保福利。 所谓“强迫劳动”,没有实地实证,源头报告可信度极低。西方国家借这套说法,制造贸易壁垒、抹黑新疆发展,本质是出于地缘目的的舆论打压,双重标准十分明显。操你妈你逼 又开始整这造谣手段了
【东方电气原董事宋致远被查,当政期间 “投资印度被当肥猪宰”?】 8月8日,中纪委通报,中国东方电气集团原党组副书记、董事宋致远涉嫌严重违纪违法,目前正接受纪律审查和监察调查。 宋致远已经退休一年多。消息出来后,东方电气过去在印度电力项目上的投资往事也被网友重新翻出。当年相关项目曾因付款、合同等问题遭遇巨额损失,在网上留下了“被印度当肥猪宰”的说法。 联想到近期被查的央企高管,网友调侃:“前有五矿,后有东方电气,希望最后真能查查那些海外投资的钱到底是怎么花的。”
一名小红书博主来到医院搭乘电梯,看到一位职工阿姨坐在电梯里吃零食刷手机。 立马就拍下来发小红书阴阳怪气这份工作,没想到帖子瞬间火了。 而后一堆网友在解释,这份工作收入低事又多,实在非常累,不能只看一幕就否定全部。 最后阿姨也是出来回应,已经被开除了,并且祝福发帖的女子。
【峰哥实名举报网红编导偷税,汪海林:子虚乌有】8月8日,“峰哥亡命天涯”实名向北京税务部门举报编剧汪海林涉嫌偷税漏税,提交截图称汪海林曾要求将部分编剧费打入妻子的美国账户。目前举报已登记受理。 约两小时后,汪海林回应称举报“子虚乌有”,是网红为了流量炒作。这其实是2022年《叱咤之城》稿酬纠纷的旧账。当时出品方就曾公布聊天及转账记录,质疑汪海林要求“私对私”、多账户及境外收款。汪海林则称合同约定税后酬劳,欢迎税务核查。 两人此前就曾在微博互相攻击,如今网络骂战直接升级成了实名税务举报。
Telegram必备的搜索引擎,极搜JISOU帮你精准找到,想要的群组、频道、视频、音乐 👉 t.me/jisou2?start=a_7597049464
😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀 😀【7T.COM】全球公认最稳! 😀只要您是【85.net】玩家,VIP1:1平移,17,7777转移彩金。 😀新会员首三存【7,777彩金】。 😀老虎机【返水1.3%】起,无上限。 😀😀😀😀:【7T.COM】 😀😀😀😀:【@SVIP7T_bot】 😀😀😀😀:【@uuu7t】
Showing the 12 most recent of 47 posts we hold for @GXDZ99. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 641,030 of 1,183,361entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Mentions
Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
- Dead references
- 1
- handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
- Evidenced gone
- 0
- we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
- Never seen alive
- 1
- vacant every time we have ever looked
@GXDZ99 named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
named in 1 post, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“吃瓜热点搞笑段子” (@GXDZ99), 4,321 subscribers as measured 11 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/GXDZ99.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.