Posted without readable text
custom 544735762052652765312custom 52154141651784250048

Channel
@GURU_FITNOPAIN
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
1,101subscribers
+4 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1001582333245 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @GURU_FITNOPAIN |
| Created | Between 1 August 2021 and 28 February 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 18 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 3 times, most recently 18 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/GURU_FITNOPAIN |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Aug 2026, 10:24 | 1,101 | +2 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 15:11 | 1,099 | +2 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 12:19 | 1,097 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 08:00 | 1,097 | first reading |
17 posts held, back to 1 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 5 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 17 (1 July 2026 – 5 August 2026) |
| Views total | 3,247 |
| Reactions total | 141 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 6 Aug 2026, 12:19 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
315 reactions across 17 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 53.7% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| custom 5447357620526527653 | 169 | 53.7% | |
| custom 5215414165178425004 | 94 | 29.8% | |
| custom 5215444784000277441 | 36 | 11.4% | |
| custom 5192988444413938411 | 16 | 5.08% |
Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 17 of the 17 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 315reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 1 July 2026 to 5 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @GURU_FITNOPAIN. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 17 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 1 July 2026 to 5 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Posted without readable text
custom 544735762052652765312custom 52154141651784250048
🎙 Подкаст «Три по пятнадцать» [2 сезона] Бесплатный, интересный и полезный подкаст, где основатели научно-популярного проекта «Фитнес Против Боли» - Вадим Гурьев и Анна Подалюк отвечают на вопросы слушателей и подписчиков. Обо всём, что волнует любого фитнес-тренера, от групповика до персональщика и супервизора, от выпускника курсов переподготовки до элит-тренера и методиста [подкаст будет не менее интересен и фитн…
custom 54473576205265276539custom 52154141651784250044custom 52154447840002774412
Может быть кому-то из вас, дорогие друзья, проще ознакомиться с основными тезисами подкаста, чем найти время на его просмотр. На сайте «Trenda Coach» опубликована отличная статья с ключевыми моментами нашего разговора, приблизительное время чтения 14-15 мин.
custom 54473576205265276537custom 52154447840002774415
Core 21 Есть ли смысл использовать регуляцию нагрузок по ИВН | ПВР с начинающими? Риски, что полученные данные будут некорректны, довольно большие. Обучение человека корректному восприятию уровня физ. нагрузок [любого типа] — это важнейший элемент тренерской деятельности. Если вы справитесь с этой непростой задачей и сможете доверять обратной связи тренируемого, управлять тренировочным планом станет намного легче.…
custom 544735762052652765321custom 52154141651784250046
Эффективно реорганизовать свой образ жизни одномоментно со всех сторон [восстановление, питание и тренинг], как демонстрирует практика, способны лишь те из нас, кто не просто уже был когда-то в хорошей физ. форме, а удерживал эту форму длительное время. Опытным фитнес-энтузиастам, чтобы вернуться в соответствующий целям режим, нужно лишь поставить будильник, тренировку в расписание дня и контейнер с едой в холодильн…
custom 544735762052652765314custom 52154141651784250047custom 52154447840002774412
Оттенки суждений о тренинге и его множественных составляющих.
custom 521541416517842500414custom 52154447840002774415custom 54473576205265276533
Друзья, если после просмотра кто-то из вас решит реорганизовать свой тренерский процесс вместе с Trenda Coach, то напишите мне в личные сообщения, дам промокод с отличной [очень ощутимой] скидкой.
custom 52154447840002774416custom 52154141651784250043
Итак, наш подкаст с Вадимом Гурьевым готов - и уже доступен к просмотру. И это точно не очередной разговор о том, какие упражнения лучше. Мы попытались разобраться в более важном вопросе: что на самом деле делает тренера профессионалом? Почему хорошей программы моет быть недостаточно? Где начинается настоящая работа с человеком? Как выстроить онлайн-ведение, не превратив его в пересылку таблиц и сообщений? И что …
custom 54473576205265276538custom 52154141651784250045
Кстати, примерно вот так будут выглядеть тренировочные планы, написанные с помощью многочисленных ИИ-ассистентов, если в русскоязычном [и не только] информационном поле считается, что отведение = разгибание.
custom 544735762052652765310custom 52154141651784250045custom 52154447840002774415
Не хочется раздувать проблему на ровном месте, дорогие друзья, но Вы-то знаете, как часто я указываю на прямую связь понятийного аппарата тренера и его профессиональных компетенций. Например вот. Когда я занимаюсь поиском подходящих демо-видосов для сопровождения тренировочных планов, мне достаточно написать что-то типа «seated cable row wide-grip pronated»▶️, как я получу просто идеально соответствующий моему запр…
custom 52154447840002774419custom 54473576205265276532custom 52154141651784250041
Этот жулик взял денег за 4 подхода в отказ, а написал в плане только 2 с регуляцией по ПВР 3.
custom 521541416517842500411custom 54473576205265276535
Вряд ли стоит тратить свое время, дорогие друзья, на просмотр типичного видоса с тревожным заголовком — там все традиционно: в данном случае автор критикует популярные способы суставной разминки нижних конечностей, а именно возможность их вращений в закрытой и открытой кинематических цепях. Что тут хотелось бы. На канале многократно упоминалось, что разминка является методически обоснованным этапом, предшествующим …
custom 544735762052652765311custom 51929884444139384115custom 52154141651784250043
Showing the 12 most recent of 17 posts we hold for @GURU_FITNOPAIN. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Citation-graph rank — 70,563 of 1,549,704entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“GURU” (@GURU_FITNOPAIN), 1,101 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/GURU_FITNOPAIN.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.