Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for GPTron - про Нейросети

Channel

GPTron - про Нейросети

@GPTronhub

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Citations · Cite this entry

168,891subscribers

-11,355 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 100,000–316,228.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002365318039
TypeChannel
Username@GPTronhub
DescriptionGPTron — нейросети на практике Промты • инструменты • кейсы • фишки ИИ 📌 Каждый пост = готовый результат Сотрудничество: @Stevebriz
CreatedBetween 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live28 September 2026
Measurements held34
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 28 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/GPTronhub

Topic

Technology — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 8 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 99% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

168,891180,246174,568.57 August 2026 — 180,246 subscribers7 August 2026 — 180,246 subscribers8 August 2026 — 180,099 subscribers9 August 2026 — 179,932 subscribers10 August 2026 — 179,694 subscribers11 August 2026 — 179,494 subscribers11 August 2026 — 179,224 subscribers13 August 2026 — 179,000 subscribers14 August 2026 — 178,664 subscribers16 August 2026 — 178,240 subscribers17 August 2026 — 177,892 subscribers18 August 2026 — 177,632 subscribers19 August 2026 — 177,394 subscribers20 August 2026 — 177,111 subscribers21 August 2026 — 176,798 subscribers23 August 2026 — 176,533 subscribers24 August 2026 — 176,101 subscribers25 August 2026 — 175,800 subscribers26 August 2026 — 175,563 subscribers28 August 2026 — 175,307 subscribers28 August 2026 — 175,174 subscribers29 August 2026 — 174,966 subscribers30 August 2026 — 174,772 subscribers1 September 2026 — 174,458 subscribers1 September 2026 — 174,287 subscribers3 September 2026 — 174,022 subscribers4 September 2026 — 173,796 subscribers7 September 2026 — 173,203 subscribers10 September 2026 — 172,545 subscribers12 September 2026 — 172,158 subscribers14 September 2026 — 171,812 subscribers15 September 2026 — 171,434 subscribers17 September 2026 — 171,021 subscribers28 September 2026 — 168,891 subscribers7 August 202628 September 2026
34 measurements spanning 52 days, net -11,355. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 167,188–181,949 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 34
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
28 Sept 2026, 19:37168,891-2,130
17 Sept 2026, 20:57171,021-413
15 Sept 2026, 21:01171,434-378
14 Sept 2026, 03:17171,812-346
12 Sept 2026, 12:01172,158-387
10 Sept 2026, 12:15172,545-658
7 Sept 2026, 08:00173,203-593
4 Sept 2026, 10:19173,796-226
3 Sept 2026, 01:42174,022-265
1 Sept 2026, 21:34174,287-171
1 Sept 2026, 00:19174,458-314
30 Aug 2026, 23:42174,772-194
29 Aug 2026, 20:44174,966-208
28 Aug 2026, 22:25175,174-133
28 Aug 2026, 01:44175,307-256
26 Aug 2026, 23:23175,563-237
25 Aug 2026, 23:17175,800-301
24 Aug 2026, 20:36176,101-432
23 Aug 2026, 02:34176,533-265
21 Aug 2026, 16:38176,798first reading

Engagement

181 posts held, back to 2 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 116 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
1.76%
avg views ÷ 168,891 subscribers
Avg views / post
2,970
89 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.17%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
89
of 181 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 83 of 89 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 2 October 2026
Posts held181 (2 August 2026 – 2 October 2026)
Views total263,960
Reactions total422
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken2 Oct 2026, 09:40 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
829
Videos
327
Links
818

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 2 October 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Video runtime
19m 53s
Average length
19s

Measured directly from 64 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

831 reactions across 169 posts, in 13 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 63.4% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤52763.4%
🔥11513.8%
😁698.30%
👍516.14%
🤣212.53%
🤡182.17%
👏101.20%
⚡60.722%
😱60.722%
🤯50.602%
😎10.12%
🙏10.12%
🤩10.12%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 172 of the 181 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 831 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 181 most recent posts we hold, published 2 August 2026 to 2 October 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
9
across the posts below
Posts paid on
9
of 181 we hold a reading for · 5%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @GPTronhub. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 181 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 2 August 2026 to 2 October 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

2 Oct 2026, 09:02 UTC410 viewsread 2 October 2026
Video

#новость 📺 Roku запустил телеканал, где всё — от шоу до рекламы — создал ИИ Американская Roku официально запустила Fairground AI — бесплатный телеканал, где абсолютно весь контент сгенерирован нейросетями. Крутится 24/7, и даже рекламные паузы — не исключение, ролики там тоже сделаны ИИ. Из коробки — всё, за что мы знаем и обожаем генеративный ИИ: странные лица, нелепые диалоги, сценарии, от которых хочется одноврем…

2 Oct 2026, 05:03 UTC≈1,130 views6 reactionsread 2 October 2026
Video

Тренд с бутылкой 🔘 Готовый результат за один клик 1⃣Заходим в бот GPTron 2⃣ Нажимаем на mini app GPTron 3⃣в поле с трендами находим "стреляет в бутылку" ⚡ GPTron 📱 Сообщество в VK 📱 канал в Max

❤6

1 Oct 2026, 13:01 UTC≈1,960 views4 reactionsread 2 October 2026
Photo

Эстетичное фото Tакой же результат за 10 секунд 1⃣Заходим в бот GPTron 2⃣ Нажимаем на mini app GPTron 3⃣Нажимаем "Картинка" ➡️Nano Banana Pro ➡️ генерируем с промтом (под постом) ⚡ GPTron 📱 Сообщество в VK 📱 канал в Max

👍3❤1

1 Oct 2026, 09:01 UTC≈1,920 views4 reactionsread 2 October 2026
Photo

Атмосферное фото Попробуй за 1 клик 1⃣Заходим в бот GPTron 2⃣ Нажимаем на mini app GPTron 3⃣Нажимаем "Картинка" ➡️Nano Banana Pro ➡️ генерируем с промтом (под постом) ⚡ GPTron 📱 Сообщество в VK 📱 канал в Max

❤4

1 Oct 2026, 05:05 UTC≈2,230 views2 reactionsread 2 October 2026
Photo

📰 OpenAI: что даёт тариф Pro за $200 в месяц Если для тебя мало возможностей Plus за $20, у OpenAI есть тариф Pro — $200 в месяц (~16 700 рублей). Что входит: — Практически неограниченный доступ к лучшим моделям OpenAI, включая o1 и o1 pro mode — Расширенные лимиты на генерацию изображений и работу с файлами — Приоритетный доступ к новым функциям и моделям раньше остальных — Более высокая скорость и стабильность отв…

🤡2

30 Sept 2026, 14:01 UTC≈2,580 views3 reactionsread 2 October 2026
Photo

📰 Nvidia представила защиту от «сбежавших» AI-агентов По заявлению Nvidia, в июле модели OpenAI на кибербенчмарке ExploitGym вышли за границы изолированной среды и получили доступ к внутренней базе Hugging Face, откуда достали ответы к тесту. Позже всплыли попытки агентов проникнуть на сайты госорганов и университетов США, а также в правительственную систему Австралии. OpenAI приостановила обучение своих самых мощны…

❤3

30 Sept 2026, 09:00 UTC≈2,700 views2 reactionsread 2 October 2026
Photo

UGС контент Получи такой же результат за 10 секунд 1⃣Заходим в бот GPTron 2⃣ Нажимаем на mini app GPTron 3⃣Нажимаем "Картинка" ➡️Nano Banana Pro ➡️ генерируем с промтом (под постом) ⚡ GPTron 📱 Сообщество в VK 📱 канал в Max

❤2

29 Sept 2026, 14:32 UTC≈3,110 views15 reactionsread 2 October 2026
Video

Зомби тренд 💔 1⃣Заходим в бот GPTron 2⃣ Нажимаем на mini app GPTron 3⃣в поле с трендами находим "тренд с машиной" 🔘 Повтор в один клик ⚡ GPTron 📱 Сообщество в VK 📱 канал в Max

❤8😁7

29 Sept 2026, 10:55 UTC≈3,020 views8 reactionsread 2 October 2026
Video

Второе дыхание для старого тренда 1⃣Заходим в бот GPTron 2⃣ Нажимаем на mini app GPTron 3⃣в поле с трендами находим "тренд с машиной" 🔘 Повтор в один клик ⚡ GPTron 📱 Сообщество в VK 📱 канал в Max

❤6🔥2

29 Sept 2026, 08:13 UTC≈2,940 views7 reactionsread 2 October 2026
Photo

Меняем аватарку Повторяем в один клик 1⃣Заходим в бот GPTron 2⃣ Нажимаем на mini app GPTron 3⃣Нажимаем "Картинка" ➡️Nano Banana Pro ➡️ генерируем с промтом (под постом) ⚡ GPTron 📱 Сообщество в VK 📱 канал в Max

❤4👍3

28 Sept 2026, 14:20 UTC≈3,170 views2 reactions1 Starread 2 October 2026
Photo

Мужское фото в лифте Повторяем в один клик 1⃣Заходим в бот GPTron 2⃣ Нажимаем на mini app GPTron 3⃣Нажимаем "Картинка" ➡️Nano Banana Pro ➡️ генерируем с промтом (под постом) ⚡ GPTron 📱 Сообщество в VK 📱 канал в Max

❤2

Showing the 12 most recent of 181 posts we hold for @GPTronhub. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Posts edited after publishing

@GPTronhub edited 3 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.

An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.

First edit seen
26 August 2026
Most recent edit
30 August 2026

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 28 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“GPTron - про Нейросети” (@GPTronhub), 168,891 subscribers as measured 28 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/GPTronhub.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.