Verify the transaction please

Channel
EURUSD USDJPY GBPUSD SIGNALS
@GOLDMASTEROFTRADE_0
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
32,504subscribers
-794 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1003571426289 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @GOLDMASTEROFTRADE_0 |
| Description | 𝗔𝗰𝗰𝗼𝘂𝗻𝘁 Investment S𝗲𝗿𝘃𝗶𝗰𝗲* S𝗮𝘃𝗲 Y𝗼𝘂𝗿 E𝗾𝘂𝗶𝘁𝘆 #𝗥𝗲𝗰𝗼𝘃𝗲𝗿Y𝗼𝘂𝗿L𝗼𝘀𝘀 #𝗠𝗮𝗸𝗲Y𝗼𝘂rC𝗮𝗽𝗶𝘁𝗮𝗹S𝗮𝗳𝗲 #𝗚𝗲𝘁C𝗼𝗻𝗳𝗶𝗿𝗺𝗗𝗮𝗶𝗹𝘆P𝗿𝗼𝗳𝗶𝘁. #FreeDailySignals #VipService #11YearsTradingExperiencee @RealAdmin_001 |
| Created | Between 1 December 2025 and 31 May 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 14 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 6 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 14 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/GOLDMASTEROFTRADE_0 |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 14 Aug 2026, 02:36 | 32,504 | -217 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 22:55 | 32,721 | -86 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 21:17 | 32,807 | -109 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 23:36 | 32,916 | -193 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 20:52 | 33,109 | -189 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 21:45 | 33,298 | first reading |
Engagement
179 posts held, back to 7 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 15 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 0.492%
- avg views ÷ 32,504 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 160
- 179 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- —
- this channel exposes no reaction counts
- Posts in window
- 179
- of 179 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 14 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 179 (7 August 2026 – 14 August 2026) |
| Views total | 28,619 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 15 Aug 2026, 02:02 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- ≈3,610
- Videos
- ≈51
- Links
- ≈1,120
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 15 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
- Video runtime
- 28s
- Average length
- 14s
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Recent posts
ᅠ
I will deposit through btc
Good. $1500 is okay by me
I would love to know more about your investment opportunities
I made profits from your signals during the day
Investors Paid ✔ Profits Secured ✔ USDT Withdrawals Completed ✔ – AUG 14, 2026 ᅠ ᅠᅠᅠᅠᅠᅠᅠᅠᅠ
https://etherscan.io/tx/0x3ba5a0c15cbed382bf11298a920ab1ee61461b29cb703fd2486526b6857bf06f
https://etherscan.io/tx/0x4aae252a187d5c66e2507f71a6cd5929be25083db5a5eabb561de8e82f839e18
https://etherscan.io/tx/0x93930bdd598c43d4b88413301a73ddde6a6b3602edf5110f21b5c8f3582c31f1
https://etherscan.io/tx/0x57bb9c33e318796bd0a7ff5a12d3d242c252905c0735cc12de2e9cadf10b10cf
https://etherscan.io/tx/0xf15767a3c80d6637e465dbac62da403e43473fd08d8b1a65bb7b9cf5a4a6f40a
Showing the 12 most recent of 179 posts we hold for @GOLDMASTEROFTRADE_0. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 145,129 of 1,345,403entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Mentions
Named by 10 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
@TheLoraxLayerr · 100,08120 postsFarid FX Signals
@TraderAvni1 · 8,17911 postsProFxSignals Free
@ProFitFxAdmin · 26 postsAva Capital (FREE)
@Ava_capital_rasmiy · 25 postsKriptoteles (FREE)
@kriptotelesss · 25 posts🔥🎯Free Signal Group🎯🔥
@Blancsko · 44 postsL7MANIPULATION SIGNAL'S (Forex)
@L7manipulation · 34 postsPROJETO CONSISTÊNCIA (FREE)
@listaofree · 114 postsTRADING XP™ (FREE SIGNALS)
@traadingxp · 34 postsVIX MAYOR⭕️ (FREE)
@kvngsolzfxfreechannel · 41 post
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“EURUSD USDJPY GBPUSD SIGNALS” (@GOLDMASTEROFTRADE_0), 32,504 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/GOLDMASTEROFTRADE_0.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.