Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for GOLDFXCC™ - [TRIAL] Channel️

Channel

GOLDFXCC™ - [TRIAL] Channel️

@GOLDFXCC

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

1,445subscribers

-23 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001276880012
TypeChannel
Username@GOLDFXCC
CreatedBetween 1 March 2018 and 31 July 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live18 September 2026
Measurements held10
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 18 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/GOLDFXCC

Topic

Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 17 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 99% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

1,4451,4681,456.56 August 2026 — 1,468 subscribers6 August 2026 — 1,468 subscribers10 August 2026 — 1,465 subscribers13 August 2026 — 1,459 subscribers17 August 2026 — 1,456 subscribers1 September 2026 — 1,454 subscribers5 September 2026 — 1,453 subscribers10 September 2026 — 1,449 subscribers14 September 2026 — 1,450 subscribers18 September 2026 — 1,445 subscribers6 August 202618 September 2026
10 measurements spanning 43 days, net -23. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,442–1,471 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
18 Sept 2026, 09:411,445-5
14 Sept 2026, 04:571,450+1
10 Sept 2026, 06:381,449-4
5 Sept 2026, 09:151,453-1
1 Sept 2026, 23:151,454-2
17 Aug 2026, 09:241,456-3
13 Aug 2026, 07:061,459-6
10 Aug 2026, 04:381,465-3
6 Aug 2026, 16:341,468no change
6 Aug 2026, 16:251,468first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 13 January 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 5 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

18 reactions across 11 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 27.8% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍527.8%
🥰527.8%
422.2%
👏211.1%
15.56%
🫡15.56%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 11 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 18 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 13 January 2026 to 5 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

5 Aug 2026, 03:39 UTC60 viewsread 6 August 2026

This is Ad JOIN HERE>>> https://t.me/elitesignals_X - High-accuracy Gold & Forex trades - No noise • No emotions • Just execution website: https://elitesignalsx.taplink.site/ 💎Trade smarter. Trade elite.

5 Jun 2026, 23:25 UTC374 viewsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @livemarketoutlook

Review your Trading Journey! ✍️There is no such thing as perfect trading. ✍️Every trader will face losses. It doesn’t matter how good your analysis is, how strong the setup looks, or how confident you feel losses are part of the game. ✍️The difference between a struggling trader and a disciplined trader is not that one loses and the other doesn’t. The difference is how they lose. ➡️You have two choices: ✍️Take e

26 May 2026, 12:12 UTC333 viewsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @livemarketoutlook

Traditionally, war pushes gold prices higher because investors move their money into safe haven assets during uncertainty. But this time, the situation is different. The conflict has pushed oil and energy prices higher, which increases inflation. Because inflation remains high, the Federal Reserve is being forced to keep interest rates elevated for longer. Higher interest rates push Treasury yields and the U.S. Dol

20 Mar 2026, 01:05 UTC503 views1 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @livemarketoutlook

Ever noticed how gold just slowly creeps up… then suddenly drops like a rock? That’s not random it’s human behaviour showing up in the market. When price is going up, people don’t rush. Big players build positions quietly and over time. Even retail traders are more patient when buying. There’s no urgency, just steady accumulation. That’s why the move up often feels slow and controlled. But when things start to go

🫡1

10 Feb 2026, 00:34 UTC607 views3 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @livemarketoutlook

Winning Psychology — #realresults Biggest mistake is holding every trade thinking it’s going to run 800–1000 pips. Those moves happen, but they’re rare, not the norm. Most of the time; honestly around 95% price will push, then retrace, and you either get taken out at breakeven or, worse, back to stop-loss. So you were right on direction, right on entry, and still made nothing. That’s why you’ve got to take 1:2 or

21

1 Feb 2026, 23:57 UTC524 viewsread 6 August 2026

1. 01/02/26 📉BUY [USDCHF] at 0.77300 Stop Loss 0.76300 Take Profit 0.88000 APPROPRIATE LOT SIZE 1% risk

1 Feb 2026, 20:36 UTC507 views1 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @livemarketoutlookPhoto

A parabolic move shows us that when price starts rising too fast, it’s usually near the end, not the beginning. These moves are driven by excitement and FOMO, not healthy demand. Strong traders and Institutions enter during quiet consolidation phases, not during explosive breakouts or sharp moves. By the time price goes parabolic, institutions are often reducing exposure or distributing, while retail traders enter e

1

31 Jan 2026, 16:27 UTC305 views1 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @livemarketoutlook

📄 Understanding Slippage: Market Reality vs Broker Myths #educational - Huge slippage comes from liquidity providers (banks and institutions) who set the executable prices. When liquidity is thin, prices can jump (THIN LIQUIDITY: means there are not many buyers and sellers in the market at that moment) . It also happens during high volatility moments like news releases (NFP, CPI, FOMC), market opens, and session ove

1

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @GOLDFXCC. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“GOLDFXCC™ - [TRIAL] Channel️” (@GOLDFXCC), 1,445 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/GOLDFXCC.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.