Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for GOAL24 PRO

Channel

GOAL24 PRO

@GOAL24Pro

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Citations · Cite this entry

95,542subscribers

-7,176 since we began measuring on 29 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002415440400
TypeChannel
Username@GOAL24Pro
DescriptionПомогаем понимать #футбол глубже. Сотрудничество: @GOAL24ADMIN Предложка: @GOAL24SCOUTBOT Ютуб: youtube.com/@GOAL24
CreatedBetween 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded29 August 2026
Last confirmed live5 September 2026
Measurements held8
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 5 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/GOAL24Pro

Growth

95,542102,71899,13029 August 2026 — 102,718 subscribers29 August 2026 — 102,718 subscribers30 August 2026 — 101,221 subscribers31 August 2026 — 100,211 subscribers1 September 2026 — 98,700 subscribers2 September 2026 — 97,574 subscribers3 September 2026 — 97,090 subscribers5 September 2026 — 95,542 subscribers29 August 20265 September 2026
8 measurements spanning 7 days, net -7,176. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 94,466–103,794 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
5 Sept 2026, 11:5795,542-1,548
3 Sept 2026, 17:4097,090-484
2 Sept 2026, 06:5897,574-1,126
1 Sept 2026, 08:4498,700-1,511
31 Aug 2026, 06:25100,211-1,010
30 Aug 2026, 08:24101,221-1,497
29 Aug 2026, 14:15102,718no change
29 Aug 2026, 14:00102,718first reading

Engagement

41 posts held, back to 23 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 19 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
46.1%
avg views ÷ 95,542 subscribers
Avg views / post
44,000
41 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.501%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
41
of 41 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 September 2026
Posts held41 (23 August 20266 September 2026)
Views total1,805,710
Reactions total9,053
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken7 Sept 2026, 06:25 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
51
Links
61

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 7 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Reaction mix

9,053 reactions across 41 posts, in 38 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 62.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
5,61262.0%
🔥8939.86%
💯6036.66%
👍4134.56%
😱4124.55%
🤬1872.07%
🤡1351.49%
🤔1181.30%
🤯1081.19%
👏951.05%
👎921.02%
❤‍🔥660.729%
😁450.497%
👀410.453%
😢290.32%
250.276%
💩190.21%
💘180.199%
😍180.199%
😎150.166%
18 further kinds1091.20%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 41 of the 41 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 9,053 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 41 most recent posts we hold, published 23 August 2026 to 6 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
44
across the posts below
Posts paid on
27
of 41 we hold a reading for · 66%
Most on one post
3
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @GOAL24Pro. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 41 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 23 August 2026 to 6 September 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

6 Sept 2026, 19:24 UTC≈9,910 views167 reactionsread 7 September 2026

🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿 Несмотря на близкий счёт, «Арсенал» выглядел слишком уверенно на фоне ещё сырого «Челси». «Канониры» контролировали игру и большую часть матча диктовали свои условия. Удивляться тут нечему — команда Артеты банально класснее, опытнее и «взрослее» по игре. Отдельно стоит выделить Эдегора. Мартин провёл фантастическую встречу, дирижировал игрой команды и заслуженно стал лучшим игроком матча. Да ещё и забил побе

🔥11226💯12👍10👏3🤔2❤‍🔥1🥴1

6 Sept 2026, 09:59 UTC≈14,600 views130 reactionsread 7 September 2026
Photo

Миллиард, рекорды и кадровая революция — чем запомнилось ТО в Серии А 🇮🇹 Главный на рынке 🤨 «Милан» стал №1 и по расходам (€165 млн) и по продажам (€87 млн). А ещё оформил две самые дорогие покупки лиги: Гонсалу Рамуш — €74 млн и Диегу Морейра — €50 млн. Рамуш заодно стал самым дорогим приобретением в истории клуба. Кадровая революция 😱 «Фиорентину» летом покинули сразу 34 футболиста — больше, чем любой другой клуб

90👍18😱14😍5❤‍🔥2💘1

5 Sept 2026, 19:26 UTC≈17,100 views147 reactions1 Starread 7 September 2026
Photo

Закуп «Барсы», ТОПы «Реала» и сага Альвареса — главные итоги ТО Ла Лиги 🇪🇸 Самые скромные — в «Бильбао» 🇪🇸 «Атлетик» не потратил ни евро (€0) на новичков — команду пополнили только вернувшиеся из аренд. При этом на продажах удалось заработать €11 млн. Главный мешок — «Реал» 💰 «Королевский клуб» потратил больше всех в лиге — €240 млн. «Сливочные» лидируют и по чистым расходам с учётом продаж: - €181 млн. Почти без п

115🔥16😱10🤯3👀21

5 Sept 2026, 14:55 UTC≈17,000 views144 reactionsread 7 September 2026

В продолжение темы про xG. Во вчерашних матчах можно было наблюдать такую статистику: ⏺«Бетис» — «Реал» 1:0 xG: 0.96 — 3.16 xGOT: 0.94 — 2.67 удары: 10 — 20 голевые моменты: 1 — 7 ⏺«ПСЖ» — «Монако» 1:2 xG: 2.32 — 0.50 xGOT: 3.76 — 1.09 удары: 23 — 4 голевые моменты: 3 — 1 О чём это говорит? Сколько бы моментов ты не создал в конкретном матче — важна реализация 🤓 Победить можно и без ударов в створ ворот... Но созда

106💯17👍11👏6🤔2🍌1😍1

5 Sept 2026, 12:53 UTC≈17,300 views158 reactions3 Starsread 7 September 2026
Photo

Можно ли победить с 0,05 xG? Как команда может выиграть при 0,05 xG, а другая — набрать 2,3 и не забить? Или метрика — просто хайп? Что такое xG❓ Если удар получил 0,05 xG, это значит, что исторически около 5% таких ударов становились голами. Примерно один из двадцати. То есть xG оценивает насколько опасным был момент. Как его считают? 🤓 Модель анализирует огромное количество прошлых ударов, учитывая расстояние, уг

126🤓11👏9🤯4😈3👍2🔥21

5 Sept 2026, 08:13 UTC≈18,400 views293 reactions1 Starread 7 September 2026
Photo

Реал засудили? Или мы что-то не знаем о правилах... В конце вчерашнего матча против «Бетиса» Мбаппе не забил 11-метровый. Бывает даже с лучшими, но внимание привлекло другое: Во время пенальти Марк Бартра забежал в штрафную раньше времени и выбил мяч после сейва вратаря. Судья посмотрел ВАР, но не дал «Реалу» перебить удар 🤯 Эпизод вызвал бурю возмущений у фанатов «сливочных», которые обвинили арбитра в предвзятости

🤬170💯4437🤔12😁9🔥7🤡7👍6

4 Sept 2026, 18:32 UTC≈20,000 views147 reactionsread 7 September 2026
Photo

5 переходов, которые изменят АПЛ 🤐 За лето в Англии потрачены рекордные €4.1 миллиарда, но все уже привыкли — эта лига живёт в другой финансовой галактике... Дороже всех 🤑 Энцо Фернандес → «Манчестер Сити» (€145 млн) Мареска позвал своего любимчика, чтобы компенсировать потерю Родри и дать команде новые опции. «Челси» при этом неплохо заработал. Но готов ли Энцо стать лидером «Сити»? Замена Салаха 🇪🇬 Брэдли Баркол

115🔥19😱8😍4🍌1

4 Sept 2026, 08:27 UTC≈21,400 views204 reactions1 Starread 7 September 2026
Photo

Футбольные «паразиты», или важная профессия? 🤑 В 2025 году клубы заплатили агентам $1,37 млрд комиссионных — рекордная сумма в истории футбола. Неудивительно, что их деятельность многим не нравится... Зачем нужны? 😎 В мире сейчас больше 10500 лицензированных представителей. Без них уже сложно вообразить футбол: ищут игрокам клубы, ведут переговоры, добиваются лучших условий и помогают с рекламными контрактами. Отку

147🤯37😱7👍5❤‍🔥4🍌1💯1🤡1

3 Sept 2026, 18:22 UTC≈24,500 views205 reactions1 Starread 7 September 2026
Photo

«Боруссия» круче «Баварии», и другие итоги ТО в Германии 🇩🇪 ⚖️ Почти €100 млн прибыли Клубы Бундеслиги потратили €666,2 млн, а получили от трансферов €763,05 млн. Итоговый баланс: +€96,85 млн — немцы снова больше продают, чем покупают. ⚽️ «РБ Лейпциг» — главный продавец «Красные быки» получили от продаж €172,75 млн и завершил окно с +€124,25 млн чистыми. Это лучший результат среди всех 18 команд лиги. 🤯 Диоманде дор

154🔥25😱11👍8🤩4👎2🍌1

3 Sept 2026, 13:45 UTC≈34,000 views332 reactions1 Starread 7 September 2026
Photo

Трансфер за €300 млн — когда ждать? Рынок улетел в космос... Ещё недавно €100 млн за игрока считались безумием, а сегодня это обыденность. Роджерс (€138 млн), Андерсон (€135 млн), Фернандеш (€100 млн) — хорошие футболисты, но разве они стоят таких денег? За какую сумму тогда должны уходить Холанд или Ямаль... 🤯 При этом дорожают не только звёзды. €60–70 млн уже просят за середнячков — и это не потолок. Но почему цен

254🤯38😱12💯10🔥5🖕4🐳3❤‍🔥2

3 Sept 2026, 07:55 UTC≈38,800 views314 reactions3 Starsread 7 September 2026
Photo

Классические вингеры вымирают? Когда-то всё было просто: правша справа, левша слева, рывок по бровке — навес на форварда. Сегодня доля вингеров на «родной» ноге сильно сократилась. Но почему? Смещение выгоднее 👯 Правша слева / левша справа после смещения к центру получают больше вариантов: удар, пас в разрез, комбинация. А бровка остаётся для рывка защитника. Поэтому Салах, Сака, Ямаль, Винисиус и другие превращают

258👍32🔥13👏5💯4🍌1💊1

2 Sept 2026, 14:43 UTC≈35,200 views540 reactions2 Starsread 7 September 2026
Photo

«Реал» VS «Барса» — кто лучше усилился? 👊 Атака Тут небольшое преимущество «каталонцев». Гордон, Жезус и Адейеми — опытные игроки с именем, которые сразу добавят качества. Бисиву и Абделькарим взяты на будущее. Траты: €122 млн. В перспективе Диоманде может затмить все подписания «Барсы», но пока ему предстоит адаптация. Эспи — хороший джокер для ротации, а Раджадо — явно не под основу. Траты: €165 млн. 🇪🇸 0 — 1 ⚽️

💯37490👎44👍8🤔84🔥4🤡3

Showing the 12 most recent of 41 posts we hold for @GOAL24Pro. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Posts edited after publishing

@GOAL24Pro edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.

An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.

First edit seen
31 August 2026
Most recent edit
31 August 2026

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 5 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“GOAL24 PRO” (@GOAL24Pro), 95,542 subscribers as measured 5 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/GOAL24Pro.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.