Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 24 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 55% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
8 measurements spanning 63 days, net +12. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 202–218 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
9 Oct 2026, 19:18
216
+3
28 Sept 2026, 13:59
213
+3
12 Sept 2026, 04:17
210
+1
4 Sept 2026, 08:01
209
+2
27 Aug 2026, 18:57
207
+1
20 Aug 2026, 22:56
206
+2
8 Aug 2026, 11:18
204
no change
7 Aug 2026, 21:14
204
first reading
Engagement
16 posts held, back to 17 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 16 posts for this entry, the most recent from 5 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
45s
Average length
23s
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
56 reactions across 16 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 37.5% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
21
37.5%
🔥
18
32.1%
custom 5406659485387207299
5
8.93%
🎉
4
7.14%
custom 5406884550263452509
3
5.36%
custom 5407072420722913841
3
5.36%
😁
2
3.57%
Custom emoji. 3 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 16 of the 16 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 56 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 16 most recent posts we hold, published 17 July 2026 to 5 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
И самое важное⬇️
Эти процедуры не конкурируют между собой.
Очень часто именно их сочетание позволяет получить лучший результат. Например, сначала убрать основной объем волос лазерной эпиляцией, а затем удалить оставшиеся волосы с помощью электроэпиляции.
Поэтому выбирать стоит не самую популярную процедуру, а ту, которая подходит именно вам.
Если вы до сих пор сомневаетесь, специалисты GLADKAYA помогут подобрать …
Когда лучше выбрать лазерную эпиляцию?
✔️ Если у вас темные и плотные волосы.
✔️ Если хочется значительно сократить рост волос уже после первых процедур.
✔️ Если важны скорость процедуры и комфорт.
Когда лучше выбрать электроэпиляцию?
✔️ Если цель - удалить волосы максимально навсегда.
✔️ Если волосы светлые, рыжие, седые или остались после курса лазера.
✔️ Если вы готовы к более длительному курсу ради максимально…
Вчера вы прошли наш мини-тест, и результаты получились очень интересными ⬇️
Большинство из вас ответили, что хотят избавиться от волос максимально надолго, готовы пройти курс процедур, а больше всего беспокоят постоянное бритье, вросшие волосы и раздражение.
Но при этом больше половины признались, что не знают, какая процедура подойдет именно им.
И это абсолютно нормально🤍
The shares total 158%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
The shares total 214%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Давайте проверим, что подойдет именно вам: лазерная или электроэпиляция?⤵️
Ответьте на несколько вопросов, а завтра разберем результаты и объясним, почему в одних случаях лучше выбрать лазер, а в других - электроэпиляцию.
Знакомьтесь - Даша, новый специалист по электроэпиляции в GLADKAYA🤍
С 1 по 7 августа у Даши действует специальное предложение для первых записей:
35 ₽/мин - женская электроэпиляция
45 ₽/мин - мужская электроэпиляция
Это отличная возможность познакомиться с новым специалистом, начать курс электроэпиляции по специальной цене и оценить внимательный, бережный подход к каждой процедуре.
Ждем вас!💫
Кейс пациента 💫
Всё началось с нескольких комедонов, но со временем их стало значительно больше. Затем появились воспаления и болезненные высыпания с гнойным содержимым.
Лечение начали с самого важного - сняли активное воспаление, скорректировали домашний уход и назначили местную терапию. После этого провели несколько процедур комбинированной чистки лица, чтобы избавиться от комедонов и улучшить состояние кожи.
Се…
🔥4❤2
Showing the 12 most recent of 16 posts we hold for @GLADKAYA_you_are. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The 6 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
The shares total 158%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
The shares total 214%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 16 most recent posts we hold, published 17 July 2026 to 5 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 October 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“GLADKAYA you are | Премиальная косметологическая клиника” (@GLADKAYA_you_are), 216 subscribers as measured 9 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/GLADKAYA_you_are.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
