Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

قِلِق | GHELEGH

@GHELEGH111

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

3,659subscribers

+399 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003141335077
TypeChannel
Username@GHELEGH111
CreatedBetween 1 September 2025 and 30 November 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live14 August 2026
Measurements held6
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 14 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/GHELEGH111

Growth

3,2243,8663,5456 August 2026 — 3,260 subscribers6 August 2026 — 3,260 subscribers6 August 2026 — 3,224 subscribers9 August 2026 — 3,657 subscribers11 August 2026 — 3,866 subscribers14 August 2026 — 3,659 subscribers3,6596 August 202614 August 2026
6 measurements spanning 9 days, net +399. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 3,128–3,962 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
14 Aug 2026, 20:593,659-207
11 Aug 2026, 20:233,866+209
9 Aug 2026, 04:113,657+433
6 Aug 2026, 11:243,224-36
6 Aug 2026, 04:483,260no change
6 Aug 2026, 00:523,260first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 25 February 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 3 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
35.9%
avg views ÷ 3,659 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,310
11 posts measured
Reaction rate
13.5%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
11
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 1 August 2026
Posts held20 (25 February 20261 August 2026)
Views total14,457
Reactions total1,947
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken7 Aug 2026, 23:41 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

2,321 reactions across 20 posts, in 14 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 19.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
44119.0%
🔥30413.1%
💯25410.9%
👍23710.2%
🥰2319.95%
🤩2119.09%
🎉2109.05%
😍2038.75%
👏1375.90%
321.38%
👌271.16%
😁220.948%
🙏60.259%
🤝60.259%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2,321reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 25 February 2026 to 1 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

1 Aug 2026, 19:15 UTC≈1,030 views245 reactionsread 7 August 2026

💢 در صنعت مهمان نوازی برخورد با مشتری ناراضی بهترین فرصت برای جلب وفاداریه 🔑 ⭕به توضیحات دقت کنید :

🔥43🎉35💯3429🥰28🤩26👍24😍22

1 Aug 2026, 16:21 UTC≈2,560 views258 reactionsread 7 August 2026

🔴 خلاصه ی تکمیلی برای اولویت بندی نهایی هم بگم خدمتتون و این بخشو ببندیم ✅ ⭕️حذف نماد پول (( ريال یا تومان )) عدد قیمتو بدون واحد و با سایز فونت کوچکتر مینویسیم تا اولویت ذهن مشتری از هزینه به لذت تغییر کنه . ⭕️(((گردوی تازه 🤤😂))) توضیحات اغواكننده به غذایی که اولویت فروش بالایی داره اضافه میکنیم ، یه توضیح یا كلمه ی احساسی میدیم مثلاً زعفرونه دشت نیشابور یا . . ⭕️قانون ۳-۳-۳ : در هر دسته بیشتر از ۳ گزینه پیشنهادی

43🎉38💯34🥰34👍29😍28🔥25🤩24

1 Aug 2026, 16:11 UTC≈2,650 views338 reactionsread 7 August 2026

◼️ قدم چهارم اولویت بندی درون هر دسته (( تکنیک لنگر )) ◼️ ⭕️درون هر دسته مثلاً بخش غذاهای اصلی ترتیبو بر اساس قیمت نزولی نمیچینیم حرفه ای ها از تکنیک لنگر (Anchor) استفاده میکنن . ⭕️اولین آیتمو گرانترین غذای ممكن قرار میدیم ( لنگر قیمت بالا ) ⭕️آیتم دومو غذایی با قیمت متوسط اما با سوددهی عالی قرار میدیم این هدف اصلی فروشمون هست . ⭕️آیتم سومو ارزان ترین گزینه قرار میدیم تا مشتری با دیدن اختلاف قیمت آیتم دومو که م

🥰60👍45😍45💯44🎉38🤩38🔥3330

31 Jul 2026, 15:31 UTC≈2,880 views408 reactionsread 7 August 2026

◼️ قدم سوم ترتیب دسته بندی کالاها از سبک به سنگین ◼️ 🔺چینش حرفه ای دسته بندی ها بر اساس عادت غذایی مشتریه 🔺برای شروع سوپ ها و سالادها با تاکید روی سالادهای خاص که سود بالایی دارن 🔺غذاهای اصلی بخش ویژه ی شاخصه - این بخشو حتماً تو مثلث طلایی قرار بدید 🔺غذاهای جانبی کنار غذاها دسرها در انتها، چون تصمیم خرید آنیه 🔺نوشیدنی های گرم و قهوه در انتها يا صفحه ای جداگانه

🤩65🔥56😍56🎉5247👍45💯42🥰41

29 Jul 2026, 14:25 UTC≈2,100 views170 reactionsread 7 August 2026

◼️ دومین قدم چیدمان بر اساس الگوی نگاه مثلث طلایی ◼️ چشم مشتری تو ۳ ثانیه اول یه مسیر مشخصو اسکن میکنه ، ترتیب دیدن به این صورته نقطه 1 بالای صفحه راست یا چپ بسته به فرهنگ مطالعه اولین جایی که چشم می افته : مهم ترین جای منو مختص به ستاره ها گرانترین و خاص ترین غذای مجموعست . نقطه 2 گوشه بالای مخالف نقطه 1 : اولویت مختص به پرفروش ترین آیتم ها . نقطه 3 مرکز پایین صفحه : سومین اولویت ( مختص به غذاهای با حاشیه سو

💯3627🥰26🤩22🔥20🎉18👍124

28 Jul 2026, 07:44 UTC902 views189 reactionsread 7 August 2026

◼️ اولین قدم از مهندسیِ مِنو ◼️ اولویت چیدمان با این 4 گروه است : 1 . ستاره ها (stars) = پرطرفدار + سود بالا : بالاترین اولویت هست و باید در بهترین جای منو قرار بگیره . 2 . اسب های کاری (powerhorses) = پرطرفدار + سود پایین : اولویت دوم ما هست و نیاز به تبلیغ نداره . 3 . معماها(puzzles) = کم طرفدار + سود بالا : اولویت سوممونه ، یا باید گارنیش عوض بشه ، یا عکس یا . . . تا نتیجه بگیریم . 4 . سگ ها (dogs) = کم طرفد

💯31😍26🔥22🤩2219🎉19👍19🥰17

28 Jul 2026, 07:30 UTC685 views167 reactionsread 7 August 2026

🔺MENU ENGINEERING🔺 ⚪️ میرسیم به این مهم 👆 مهندسیِ منو و روانشناسیِ چیدمان تاثیرش روی فروش و تاثیرش روی آیتمی که میخوایم فروش اون بالاتر بره

38👍23💯22🔥22🥰15😍15🤩14🎉10

22 Jul 2026, 20:12 UTC510 views39 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Voice message

Voice message, posted without a caption

21👌8👏62😁1🙏1

22 Jul 2026, 20:10 UTC433 views33 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Voice message

Voice message, posted without a caption

👏17👌652💯2😁1

22 Jul 2026, 07:00 UTC401 views47 reactionsread 7 August 2026

⭕️ اینو در نظر داشته باشید که باید به میهمانی که وارد مجموعه میشه احساس (( دیده شدن )) بدیم حالا چطور ؟ 💢هممون دوست داریم که دیده بشیم و حضورمون اهمیت داشته بشه و بهمون توجه بشه 💢بخش بزرگی از تجربه ی میهمان نه به غذا مربوطه نه به قهوه و آیتمی که براش سرو میشه بلکه همه چی به همین حسِ ساده ی دیده شدن برمیگرده :) ✅ یکم براتون بازش میکنم : به ویس گوش بدید 🔑

👏18😍117👍5💯4😁1🙏1

21 Jul 2026, 16:02 UTC306 views53 reactionsread 7 August 2026

از اصول مشتری مداری 🔺 فضا و اتمسفر 🔺 منو و سفارش گیری 🔺 کیفیت سرویس دهی 🔺مدیریت شکایات و بحران 🔺 وفادارسازی مشتریان 🔺 مدیریت و آموزش پرسنل و . . . موارد دیگه رو مرور کردیم کامل بحث جدیدی که داریم اینه که پول کجاست ؟ یه سری وقتا با رعایت تمام این موارد باز هم بازدهی مثبت نیست ! 😂 سری موارد جدیدی که عرض میکنم خدمتتون کلا دیدگاه جدیدی بهتون میده 🔮😉

23👌117👏7💯3😁1🙏1

28 May 2026, 06:52 UTC332 views51 reactionsread 7 August 2026

یه جمع بندی بکنیم تا اینجا . .

25🔥107👏7💯1😁1

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @GHELEGH111. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 1,108,015 of 1,345,403entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“قِلِق | GHELEGH” (@GHELEGH111), 3,659 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/GHELEGH111.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.