Channel
@GG_meet
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
5,072subscribers
-27 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002187769627 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @GG_meet |
| Description | Discover and participate in key events and activities within the crypto community. |
| Created | Between 1 June 2024 and 11 September 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 11 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 11 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/GG_meet |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 11 Aug 2026, 04:46 | 5,072 | -23 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 19:15 | 5,095 | -4 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 13:46 | 5,099 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 13:34 | 5,099 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 11 September 2024 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 7 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 11 June 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
889 reactions across 14 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 33.2% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 295 | 33.2% | |
| ❤ | 278 | 31.3% | |
| 🔥 | 212 | 23.8% | |
| 🤣 | 64 | 7.20% | |
| 👏 | 25 | 2.81% | |
| 🕊 | 13 | 1.46% | |
| 🖕 | 1 | 0.112% | |
| 😱 | 1 | 0.112% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 14 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 889reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 11 September 2024 to 11 June 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Solana paused for ~2 hours this week — and markets noticed. ⚠️ A short but disruptive network stop pushed SOL lower and revived debate about validator concentration and reliance on a single client. The timing is critical: the community is ramping up testing for the major Alpenglow upgrade, making reliability the top near-term priority for builders, exchanges and traders. Takeaway: expect heightened volatility and c…
Breaking: On 2 June 2026 the US Treasury’s OFAC sanctioned four Iranian crypto exchanges — Nobitex, Wallex, Bitpin, and Ramzinex — adding secondary‑sanctions language that widens exposure for non‑US firms. 🚨 This isn’t just geopolitics: any meetup, custodian or bridge accepting deposits or routing payments tied to these platforms now faces real compliance risk. If you organise events, run a node/service, or operate …
Binance is closing its centralized NFT marketplace — act now. Binance told users it will wind down its CEX NFT service and push NFT activity into wallets. Transferable NFTs must be withdrawn by 23:59 UTC, July 3, 2026 or they risk becoming inaccessible on the exchange. Binance is covering certain withdrawal fees for a limited time to speed moves to Binance Wallet (BSC or ETH). This is a clear signal: major exchange…
ETHConf — New York, June 8–10, 2026 🚀 Big week ahead for the Ethereum ecosystem: ETHGlobal’s ETHConf gathers builders, protocols and DeFi teams in NYC for three days of talks, hack sessions and networking. If you’re launching a product, hunting talent, or scouting integrations — this is the place to be. Limited last-minute passes and meetups still popping up. Details & schedule 📅🗽
🖕1
#HMSTR 🎁 Bybit exchange will distribute 70,000,000 HMSTR tokens! ✔️ Preparation: Register Bybit 30k$ Complete level 1 verification Click the registration button or in the promo. ✔️ Promotion 1 – 50,000,000 HMSTR (For new users only) Deposit at least 10,000 HMSTR OR buy HMSTR for 100 USDT (as part of your first spot trade) Get 2,000 HMSTR tokens. ✔️ Promotion 2 – 12,000,000 HMSTR (For all users) Trade HMSTR wit…
👍255❤235🔥175🤣64👏17🕊13😱1
🚀 Polymarket plans to launch its own token! According to recent reports, Polymarket, a popular decentralized prediction market, is in discussions to roll out its native token. Along with this, the platform is also negotiating to raise $50 million in new funding. These moves come amid a surge in interest around election betting and other prediction markets. You can read the original source for more details: Polymark…
❤20👏8
🔥 "The SEC has approved the listing of options for BlackRock’s spot Bitcoin ETF – document ▫️Eric Balchunas: 'The SEC’s decision is just one step in the approval process; green lights from the OCC and CFTC are still required.' ❗️Larry Fink, CEO of BlackRock: 'Bitcoin is a legitimate financial instrument that deserves to be part of investment portfolios.' ▫️Bitwise: 'The launch of BlackRock's spot Bitcoin ETF optio…
🔥8
#TON #BNB ✈️ BNB Chain announced its integration into Telegram – (announcement). They simplified the integration of BNB Chain into Telegram bots (SDK Privy) and added BNB support in several Telegram wallets. All crypto Events by GG
🔥3
😳 #SOL The new Solana Mobile (Seeker) All crypto Events by GG
❤8
⚡️ Jerome Powell (Chairman of the Federal Reserve): ✔️ The economy remains generally strong. ✔️ The labor market continues to cool, which is a significant step forward compared to the beginning of this year. ✔️ Today's decision reflects growing confidence that labor market stability can be maintained. ✔️ Consumer spending remains steady. ✔️ Inflation has noticeably decreased but remains above our target level. ✔️ Th…
🔥7👍6
Photo, posted without a caption
⏳ DWF Labs promises to introduce "several innovations" in the near future – Andrei Grachev All crypto Events by GG
🔥7👍3
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @GG_meet. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 411,990 of 1,169,250entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“All crypto Events by GG” (@GG_meet), 5,072 subscribers as measured 11 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/GG_meet.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.