Gm

Channel
πππππ± πππ¦π¬ πππ’π₯π² ππΈ
@GEMS_DAILY
On this record: Topic Β· Growth Β· Engagement Β· Reactions Β· Posts Β· Citations Β· Handles named that no longer answer Β· Cite this entry
62subscribers
-7 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register Β· movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1002119261322 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @GEMS_DAILY |
| Created | Between 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024 β estimated from Telegramβs id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 10 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 7 October 2026 |
| Measurements held | 6 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 7 October 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/GEMS_DAILY |
Topic
Crypto & trading β a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channelβs own recent posts on 28 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 83% confidence. This is a modelβs judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured β it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 7 Oct 2026, 11:56 | 62 | -1 |
| 26 Sept 2026, 02:00 | 63 | -2 |
| 6 Sept 2026, 02:21 | 65 | -2 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 14:03 | 67 | -2 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 00:16 | 69 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 13:09 | 69 | first reading |
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 14 August 2024 β the reader has not yet reached the start of this channelβs public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegramβs post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute β we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 28 July 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Reaction mix
741 reactions across 15 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 28.1% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| π | 208 | 28.1% | |
| β€ | 136 | 18.4% | |
| π₯° | 82 | 11.1% | |
| π₯ | 78 | 10.5% | |
| π | 67 | 9.04% | |
| π | 63 | 8.50% | |
| π | 62 | 8.37% | |
| π― | 42 | 5.67% | |
| β‘ | 3 | 0.405% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities β π is thanks in one channel and mourning in another β so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one β 4.34K, 1.2M β so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 15 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegramβs own count on each post β not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above β those same posts carry 741 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by βa reaction total printed elsewhere on the pageβ.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 14 August 2024 to 28 July 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
Shill me potential project New project and cto can come in tooπ―
π₯13π₯°10β€9π9π4π4π2
πππππ± πππ¦π¬ πππ’π₯π² ππΈ pinned Deleted message
πππππ± πππ¦π¬ πππ’π₯π² ππΈ pinned Deleted message
NEW ATH INCOMING π
π5π₯°5π₯3π2π2β€1
πππππ± πππ¦π¬ πππ’π₯π² ππΈ pinned Deleted message
πππππ± πππ¦π¬ πππ’π₯π² ππΈ pinned a photo
My name is βMAOβ η« - Chinese for "Cat"! Iβm basically Neiroβs sibling cat, Only cuter! The one & only $MAO on πΉ We wonβt stop until the world learns to MAO MAO with us π»π«΅ CA: 0x6b01Cf88fbCbc523b6aC87d74d98Fb1E18eD0Cf9 maocoineth.com t.me/MaoETH
β€22π9
Which Token Will Hit An All Time High Next?! π―π― Shill me with potential π π°
π14β€13π₯12π9π9π₯°7π3
Note: all coins are gambles these days always DYOR and take profit when you can
β€15π15π₯12π11π10π₯°10π9
SOME GOOD ALPHA COMING ARE YOU GUYS READY?? REACT LET'S GO.
β€7π₯7π₯°7π6π3π3π2
π¦βΆοΈπ¦ POTUS POLL fastrack listing has ordered on Coingecko. fairlaunch on-going on Pinksale. Add your bag π°π°π° πͺͺKYC β AUDIT πͺͺDOXX πBuy link: https://www.pinksale.finance/solana/launchpad/EdvkvPsebANQaDbEfLpi2ozc59catNKFvFr7neRLgPaR π₯Bullishmarketcap: https://www.bullishmarketcap.com/coins/potuspoll556 βοΈ 0/0 Tax βοΈ KYC & Audited %DOXX βοΈ Binance live βοΈ Liquidity locked βοΈBased Dev π We will make a community of β¦
π7β€6π3π₯°3π₯2π1π1
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @GEMS_DAILY. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked β was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it β t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so β1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason β naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides β the βNamed by N registered channelsβ figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
- Dead references
- 3
- handles named in this channelβs posts, vacant today
- Evidenced gone
- 0
- we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
- Never seen alive
- 3
- vacant every time we have ever looked
@GEMS_DAILY named 3 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handleβs history β see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today β not that anything βdiedβ. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel β we have no record it ever was one.
named in 5 posts, 10 August 2026 β 10 August 2026
named in 1 post, 10 August 2026 β 10 August 2026
named in 1 post, 10 August 2026 β 10 August 2026
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 October 2026 β this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
βπππππ± πππ¦π¬ πππ’π₯π² ππΈβ (@GEMS_DAILY), 62 subscribers as measured 7 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/GEMS_DAILY.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV Β· JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.