Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

GA内核【🇨🇳官方】

@GApro888

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

837subscribers

+22 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1004296760204
TypeChannel
Username@GApro888
CreatedBetween 1 May 2026 and 31 July 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live8 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 8 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/GApro888

Growth

8158378267 Aug 2026, 21:11 — 815 subscribers8 Aug 2026, 01:33 — 815 subscribers8 Aug 2026, 14:23 — 837 subscribers7 Aug 2026, 21:118 Aug 2026, 14:23
3 measurements taken within a single day, net +22. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 812–840 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
8 Aug 2026, 14:23837+22
8 Aug 2026, 01:33815no change
7 Aug 2026, 21:11815first reading

Engagement

19 posts held, back to 31 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
85.7%
avg views ÷ 837 subscribers
Avg views / post
717
16 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.293%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
19
of 19 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 10 of 16 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 August 2026
Posts held19 (31 July 20266 August 2026)
Views total11,478
Reactions total22
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken8 Aug 2026, 01:33 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
16s
Average length
16s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

22 reactions across 10 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 50.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
1150.0%
👍1045.5%
🤝14.55%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 10 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 22reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 31 July 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

6 Aug 2026, 09:02 UTC249 viewsread 8 August 2026

GA内核对接 1.无成本(你不用出钱) 2.你可以轻松卖卡赚奶茶钱 我 @QLSJJJJ 客服 @QLSJJJJbot

6 Aug 2026, 07:27 UTC262 viewsread 8 August 2026

服了,原本的卡网2跑过来,现在已经换了新的卡网

3 Aug 2026, 02:26 UTC894 views3 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

GA内核[云更新] 适配游戏: ✅失控进化(正常运行) ❌和平精英(暂时停用) ❓PUBG Mobile(内测) [GA内核功能介绍] 【下载GA内核】 【GA内核云盘下载】 【免手续费地址①】 【免手续费地址②】 [GA失控内核自瞄配置] GA内核对接 1.无成本(你不用出钱) 2.你可以轻松卖卡赚奶茶钱 <买天卡送小时卡找客服> <买周卡送天卡找客服> [送天卡]<可直播引流的或发作品高播放量> [反馈送小时卡] 客服:@QLSJJJJ 双向:@QLSJJJJbot

2👍1

2 Aug 2026, 15:47 UTC780 views1 reactionsread 8 August 2026

TX/GA内核对接免费,周入1000+ 欢迎有卖卡实力的人来找我对接 我:@QLSJJJJ 双向:@QLSJJJJbot

1

2 Aug 2026, 12:08 UTCviews —

GA内核【🇨🇳官方】 pinned «近期,我在参与[失控进化]的过程中,因一时贪图捷径、追求虚假的“游戏优势”,未能抵制住不良诱惑,违规使用了第三方外挂程序。这一行为不仅严重违反了《腾讯游戏许可及服务协议》中关于“禁止使用外挂、脚本等破坏游戏公平性工具”的明确规定,更对其他正常玩家的游戏体验造成了极大伤害,破坏了游戏环境的公平与秩序,也给贵司的运营管理工作带来了不必要的困扰。我深知,外挂行为是游戏行业的“毒瘤”,它不仅违背了竞技精神,更触碰了法律与道德的底线,我的行为实在不该,也绝不能被原谅,经过深刻反思,我认识到此次犯错的根本原因在于:一…»

2 Aug 2026, 12:08 UTC≈1,660 views4 reactionsread 8 August 2026

近期,我在参与[失控进化]的过程中,因一时贪图捷径、追求虚假的“游戏优势”,未能抵制住不良诱惑,违规使用了第三方外挂程序。这一行为不仅严重违反了《腾讯游戏许可及服务协议》中关于“禁止使用外挂、脚本等破坏游戏公平性工具”的明确规定,更对其他正常玩家的游戏体验造成了极大伤害,破坏了游戏环境的公平与秩序,也给贵司的运营管理工作带来了不必要的困扰。我深知,外挂行为是游戏行业的“毒瘤”,它不仅违背了竞技精神,更触碰了法律与道德的底线,我的行为实在不该,也绝不能被原谅,经过深刻反思,我认识到此次犯错的根本原因在于:一是自身规则意识淡薄,对游戏协议的条款缺乏敬畏之心,存在“侥幸心理”,认为偶尔使用不会被发现;二是价值观出现偏差,将“游戏输赢”置于“公平诚信”之上,忽视了游戏本质是休闲娱乐与自我挑战,而非不择手段的“胜负工具”;三是缺乏对他人权益的尊重,未意识到自己的违规行为会让其他玩家的辛勤付出变得毫无意义,损害了广大玩家共同维护的游戏生态,

3🤝1

2 Aug 2026, 01:49 UTC567 views1 reactionsread 8 August 2026

等待更新 今晚或者明天 有一些bug 到时会更新在app里面 到时更新会和ZTX 和GA和平一起更新一下

1

Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @GApro888. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 296,129 of 1,160,990entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“GA内核【🇨🇳官方】” (@GApro888), 837 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/GApro888.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.