Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for хванчян переехала!

Channel

хванчян переехала!

@G0JINN1E

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

204subscribers

+1 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001969214057
TypeChannel
Username@G0JINN1E
Created16 April 2023measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live15 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 15 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/G0JINN1E

Growth

203204203.57 August 2026 — 203 subscribers8 August 2026 — 203 subscribers15 August 2026 — 204 subscribers7 August 202615 August 2026
3 measurements spanning 8 days, net +1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 203–204 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
15 Aug 2026, 20:52204+1
8 Aug 2026, 11:19203no change
7 Aug 2026, 19:50203first reading

Engagement

17 posts held, back to 6 June 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 17 posts for this entry, the most recent from 20 July 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
2m 20s
Average length
2m 20s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

629 reactions across 15 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 38.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 545880211493751503224138.3%
custom 530086984527174029521133.5%
custom 538671841179339099017728.1%

Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 15 of the 17 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 629reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 6 June 2025 to 20 July 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
4
across the posts below
Posts paid on
2
of 15 we hold a reading for · 13%
Most on one post
3
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @G0JINN1E. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 17 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 6 June 2025 to 20 July 2025. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

19 Jul 2025, 15:45 UTCviews —

хванчян переехала! pinned «супер пупер информация для всех кто остался жив и ждал/ждет моего оживления я решила переехать на новый канал так как эта коробка уже изжила себя за два года существования и у меня совсем не осталось сил и мотивации на нее как и других добрых чувств…… буду…»

19 Jul 2025, 15:45 UTC509 views3 reactionsread 8 August 2026

супер пупер информация для всех кто остался жив и ждал/ждет моего оживления я решила переехать на новый канал так как эта коробка уже изжила себя за два года существования и у меня совсем не осталось сил и мотивации на нее как и других добрых чувств…… буду ждать вас здесь (с новой картинкой) 😢

custom 53867184117933909903

22 Jun 2025, 16:18 UTC839 views28 reactionsread 8 August 2026

такими темпами опять в кпопис упасть можно ужас

custom 538671841179339099021custom 54588021149375150327

22 Jun 2025, 16:07 UTC793 views28 reactionsread 8 August 2026

господи ники ребенок когда ты вырос……..

custom 538671841179339099022custom 53008698452717402956

22 Jun 2025, 16:06 UTC704 views29 reactionsread 8 August 2026

мое личное никому не нужное мнение таково что заглавка ни в какое сравнение с этой имбой не идет

custom 545880211493751503221custom 53008698452717402958

22 Jun 2025, 16:06 UTC621 views30 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video

ЧЕ ТВОРЯТ ЧЕ ТВОРЯЯЯТ

custom 530086984527174029524custom 53867184117933909906

20 Jun 2025, 17:14 UTC534 views62 reactions3 Starsread 8 August 2026
Photo

ваша няшка упала в чан с апельсиновым соком

custom 545880211493751503244custom 530086984527174029518

20 Jun 2025, 17:05 UTC490 views46 reactions1 Starread 8 August 2026

ура новая эра (почему она все еще жива?)

custom 538671841179339099031custom 545880211493751503215

11 Jun 2025, 18:07 UTC586 views64 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

закатное полюшко для хорошего настроения

custom 545880211493751503246custom 530086984527174029518

10 Jun 2025, 14:43 UTC487 views61 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

аааааа что это она девочка???!!?!??!

custom 545880211493751503240custom 530086984527174029521

9 Jun 2025, 15:50 UTC437 views44 reactionsread 8 August 2026

когда я говорю что мне нравятся мужчины я имею в виду ЭТОТ мужчина

custom 538671841179339099028custom 530086984527174029516

Showing the 12 most recent of 17 posts we hold for @G0JINN1E. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 1,005,155 of 1,548,671entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“хванчян переехала!” (@G0JINN1E), 204 subscribers as measured 15 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/G0JINN1E.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.