Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Full Void LLP 🖤

Channel

Full Void LLP 🖤

@FullVoid_HQ

2 usernames

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

1,378subscribers

+16 since we began measuring on 21 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002055174621
TypeChannel
Usernames@FullVoid_HQ @FullVoid_IR
Descriptionچنل اصلی ( یوتیوب ) : https://youtube.com/@fullvoidteam?si=7j0nta7RwuhrlzIK گپ : @Plumber_HQ آرشیو سریال ها ( بن 10، جنریتور رکس، دنی فنتوم، سیکرت ستردیز، سیم‌بایانیک تایتان ) : https://t.me/+4NHSCPRQW20yNjhk
CreatedBetween 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded21 August 2026
Last confirmed live19 September 2026
Measurements held10
On Telegramt.me/FullVoid_HQ

Topic

Gaming — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 19 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 61% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

11,38569321 August 2026 — 1,362 subscribers22 August 2026 — 1,364 subscribers25 August 2026 — 1,370 subscribers28 August 2026 — 1,377 subscribers31 August 2026 — 1,380 subscribers3 September 2026 — 1,385 subscribers8 September 2026 — 1,384 subscribers12 September 2026 — 1 subscribers19 September 2026 — 1,378 subscribers19 September 2026 — 1,378 subscribers1,37821 August 202619 September 2026
10 measurements spanning 29 days, net +16. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
19 Sept 2026, 10:221,378no change
19 Sept 2026, 09:471,378+1,377
12 Sept 2026, 09:211-1,383
8 Sept 2026, 10:191,384-1
3 Sept 2026, 02:261,385+5
31 Aug 2026, 07:351,380+3
28 Aug 2026, 00:061,377+7
25 Aug 2026, 08:021,370+6
22 Aug 2026, 12:081,364+2
21 Aug 2026, 22:011,362first reading

Engagement

30 posts held, back to 18 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
42.3%
avg views ÷ 1,378 subscribers
Avg views / post
583
15 posts measured
Reaction rate
5.07%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
16
of 30 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 18 September 2026
Posts held30 (18 August 202618 September 2026)
Views total8,745
Reactions total443
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken19 Sept 2026, 10:22 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
903
Videos
269
Links
158

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 19 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Video runtime
4m 22s
Average length
1m 06s

Measured directly from 4 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

759 reactions across 29 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 46.9% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🔥35646.9%
23731.2%
😭567.38%
🤣526.85%
😁314.08%
👍253.29%
💔20.264%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 29 of the 30 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 759 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 30 most recent posts we hold, published 18 August 2026 to 18 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

18 Sept 2026, 10:12 UTC313 views19 reactionsread 19 September 2026
Photo

♨️خلاصه داستان Ben 10 #7 : بن تنیسون گروگان گرفته شده است! و از این پس همه چیز بدتر خواهد شد، چرا که هکس مرموز برای نخستین بار با نیرو های فراطبیعی کفرآمیز ارتباط برقرار می‌کند! آیا مکس و گوئن می‌توانند قبل از سازمان تازه تاسیس SECT بن را پیدا کنند ؟ همچنین در این ایشو، نخستین حضور فردی از گذشته‌ی رازآلود مکس، به علاوه ظهور خارق‌العاده‌ی اورفلو رخ می‌دهد!

🔥172

Signed Alirez

18 Sept 2026, 10:12 UTC312 views25 reactionsread 19 September 2026
Photo

♨️ طبق خلاصه داستان ایشوی هفتم، حضور گروه محبوب و فن فیوریت «SECT» در این ایشو تایید شد. مشخص نیست که خود ستوان استیل هم بینشون هست یا نه، اما احتمالا روزام با استفاده از تجهیزات کرب تونسته این تشکیلات رو بنا کنه.

🔥231👍1

Signed Alirez

18 Sept 2026, 07:51 UTCviews —

Full Void LLP 🖤 pinned «دوستان، بنده حتی قبل از شروع انتشار کمیک هم عرض کرده بودم که "اگه‌ کمیک چرتوپرت نباشه ترجمه رو سریع میرسونم" این ایشو چرتوپرت بود بنابراین ترجمش رو سریع نمیرسونم‌؛ ترجمه برای بنده کار اونقدر سختی نیست اما باید لذت بخش باشه، وقتی علاقه ی خاصی به این ایشو ندارم…»

18 Sept 2026, 06:56 UTC348 views23 reactionsread 19 September 2026
Photo

🔴 ورینت کاور دانکن رولو برای Ben 10 #7 📆 تاریخ انتشار : 11 آذر / 2 دسامبر ✍ @FullVoid_HQ

🔥22👍1

Signed - 𝘢𝘴𝘩

18 Sept 2026, 06:43 UTC348 views20 reactionsread 19 September 2026
Photo

⭕️ از شماره هفتم کمیک بن تن معرفی شد 👥 خالقین : جو کیسی ( نویسنده ) رابرت کری ( تصویرساز ) 📆 تاریخ انتشار : 11 آذر / 2 دسامبر ✍ @FullVoid_HQ

🔥181👍1

Signed - 𝘢𝘴𝘩

16 Sept 2026, 22:03 UTC424 views36 reactionsread 19 September 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

🤣33😭3

Signed - 𝘢𝘴𝘩

16 Sept 2026, 12:01 UTC455 views45 reactionsread 19 September 2026
Video

بین التیمیت ها وقتی بحث به التیمیت اکو اکو میرسه:

😁27🔥18

Signed - 𝘢𝘴𝘩

16 Sept 2026, 11:28 UTC441 views12 reactionsread 19 September 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

12

Signed - 𝘢𝘴𝘩

15 Sept 2026, 20:14 UTC503 views59 reactionsread 19 September 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

🔥43🤣16

Signed - 𝘢𝘴𝘩

15 Sept 2026, 20:10 UTC474 views17 reactionsread 19 September 2026
Photo

باز اتفاق افتاد منتها ایندفعه سر این بحث ( بیاید تو کامنت باهم بحث کنیم دربارش )

🔥17

Signed - 𝘢𝘴𝘩

12 Sept 2026, 14:06 UTC880 views52 reactionsread 19 September 2026
Video

Video, posted without a caption

😭49🤣3

Signed - 𝘢𝘴𝘩

12 Sept 2026, 03:12 UTC872 views8 reactionsread 19 September 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

8

Signed - 𝘢𝘴𝘩

Showing the 12 most recent of 30 posts we hold for @FullVoid_HQ. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

کتابخانه روانشناسی و روانپزشکی
@ravanketabb · 23,041
Telegram ranks this channel #77 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 19 September 2026
جزوات کنکوری روانشناسی
@jozveravan1 · 22,499
Telegram ranks this channel #85 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 20 September 2026

This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 19 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Full Void LLP 🖤” (@FullVoid_HQ), 1,378 subscribers as measured 19 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/FullVoid_HQ.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.