Channel
@FullPortCartel
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
232,458subscribers
-2,351 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 100,000–316,228.
| Telegram ID | -1002245606127 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @FullPortCartel |
| Description | Max Ape in Degen | Solana - BSC - Base Owner & Maketing DM: @max_ape |
| Created | Between 1 May 2024 and 31 October 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 7 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 12 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/FullPortCartel |
Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 8 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Aug 2026, 03:12 | 232,458 | -422 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 05:08 | 232,880 | -475 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 07:34 | 233,355 | -377 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 07:52 | 233,732 | -495 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 05:02 | 234,227 | -396 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 04:38 | 234,623 | -186 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 19:32 | 234,809 | first reading |
19 posts held, back to 22 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 17 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 19 posts for this entry, the most recent from 1 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
90 reactions across 14 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 48.9% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 44 | 48.9% | |
| 🔥 | 25 | 27.8% | |
| ❤ | 16 | 17.8% | |
| 👏 | 4 | 4.44% | |
| 🎉 | 1 | 1.11% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 14 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 90reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 22 June 2026 to 1 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
$WORLD got new ATH at $12.2M MC So what next, let's check TA for $world After touch the strong support at $5.5M MC (i know you all miss this entry point), $world gonna go like this. Entry: $6M - $7M MC SL: -50% TP: at least $15M MC from here follow me on X for more TA for $world: https://x.com/logan_bigboy/status/2072383775770644909?s=20
👍8❤2🎉1
$murad just x7 from my call on X rarely on tele now, catch me on X https://x.com/logan_bigboy/status/2071998203302486343?s=20
The answer: $ANSEM Get some money guys
MoonRush will have Perps soon. Let's x50 together lol
just sent about thousand $ for my referrals on MoonRush This man traded 7 times so sent them $7 ty for the support, some kind of drops will be happened anytime for my supporters easy to join this thing: http://moonrush.space/r/logan
👍2
Kind of busy these days, meet me more often on X have TA for memecoins, bullpost, etc https://x.com/logan_bigboy
4SE7Bsby4HRGRsNBoXUFWmisQ61n7WJqBKoAM2TQqVxx gamble
world is my friend now https://x.com/logan_bigboy/status/2069982755664883764?s=20
👍5
$world is first verified on MoonRush FMqh9mqR6drPZqqW6wPqLHxX4rqNDWGhYLaMfoaJpump https://x.com/moonrush_space/status/2069801558825369853?s=20
👍3
$world pumped x6 in a day they got a stacked partner lineup, and MoonRush is one of them now (my newest partner lmao) just download it and wait: http://moonrush.space/r/logan something special is cooking, but I can’t spill yet.
🔥5👏2
shift your stoploss to entry. Protect your fund D93qx6RYPhx5dYupo83tZZRj1uEUG9XnNoWG9qmjpump +67%
🔥6❤2
D93qx6RYPhx5dYupo83tZZRj1uEUG9XnNoWG9qmjpump The issue of hiding the logos of non-sponsored World Cup products sl: -50%
👍5❤2
Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @FullPortCartel. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 38,993 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Full Port Cartel - Meme Calls” (@FullPortCartel), 232,458 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/FullPortCartel.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.