Channel
@From_Tv
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
27,160subscribers
-237 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
| Telegram ID | -1001579114775 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @From_Tv |
| Description | اولین و بزرگترین چنل سریال فرام محصول شبکه Epix در انتظار فصل چهارم دانلود فصل اول و دوم و سوم https://t.me/+KTMbEWg9ZPFmYThk تبلیغات : @erfan_ho121 |
| Created | Between 1 August 2021 and 28 February 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 17 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 10 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 17 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/From_Tv |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 17 Aug 2026, 21:03 | 27,160 | -22 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 21:37 | 27,182 | -31 |
| 15 Aug 2026, 16:52 | 27,213 | -27 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 01:14 | 27,240 | -22 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 16:04 | 27,262 | -21 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 14:12 | 27,283 | -19 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 15:15 | 27,302 | -24 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 12:52 | 27,326 | -52 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 12:42 | 27,378 | -19 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 17:02 | 27,397 | first reading |
24 posts held, back to 31 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 28 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 23 of 24 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 17 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 24 (31 July 2026 – 17 August 2026) |
| Views total | 88,398 |
| Reactions total | 853 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 18 Aug 2026, 04:07 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 18 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
853 reactions across 22 posts, in 14 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 55.1% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 470 | 55.1% | |
| 😁 | 114 | 13.4% | |
| ❤🔥 | 84 | 9.85% | |
| 😍 | 83 | 9.73% | |
| 👌 | 58 | 6.80% | |
| 🔥 | 17 | 1.99% | |
| 💔 | 7 | 0.821% | |
| 🙏 | 6 | 0.703% | |
| 🌚 | 5 | 0.586% | |
| 😎 | 4 | 0.469% | |
| 🤗 | 2 | 0.234% | |
| 💘 | 1 | 0.117% | |
| 😭 | 1 | 0.117% | |
| 😱 | 1 | 0.117% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 23 of the 24 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 853reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 24 most recent posts we hold, published 31 July 2026 to 17 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
وضعیت این روزای ایران خیلیامون رو به بن بست کشونده درآمد 95 درصد مردم الان ریالیه اما قیمت همه چی به دلاره اگر بخوایم از زندگی عقب نمونیم و جزو اون 95 درصد مردم نباشیم چاره ای نداریم جز اینکه درآمدمون دلاری باشه همه وارد کانال زیر بشید لینکشو گذاشتم همه رو به درآمد دلاری میرسونه لینک کانالشو میزارم عضوش بشید 👇👇 https://t.me/+XmEqhTiT7A4xYTRk https://t.me/+XmEqhTiT7A4xYTRk
😁1
Signed 𝖾𝗋𝖿𝖺𝗇
حالا ما میدونیم که صداهای سر سارا یه بخشی مربوط به مرد زرد پوشه و همچنین کسی که پشت تلفن میگفت من توماسم هم مرد زرد پوش بوده اگه دقت کنین زمانی که تابیتا از شهر خارج شد و دوباره وارد شد تلفن زنگ زد به ایتن گفت مامان داره میاد خونه من توماسم یا زمانی که کشیش وارد شهر شد قبلش مرد زرد پوش لباسشو دراورد و تغییر شکل داد به یه دختر با استایل مذهبی و گردنبند صلیب یعنی مرد زرد پوش میدونه که هر لحظه چه کسی و چه شخصیتی وارد شه…
❤27👌1🔥1
Signed ali
همتون این دو تا نقاشی از میراندا رو دیدید که یکیش مربوط به روحانی قرن ۱۶ میلادی و اون یکی مربوط به یک زن کاتولیک از قرن ۱۷/۱۸ میلادیه . اینا شکل های مختلف همون موجود شیطانی هستن که الان از کالبد پیرمرد زرد پوش داره استفاده میکنه و تو هر چرخه در قالب یک فرد مذهبی وارد شهر میشه . یه چیز دیگه ای هم که هست راجب شخصیت ساراست تو اکثر فیلما یک شخصیت به اسم سارا وجود داره که توسط نیرو های شیطانی دست کاری میشه و اینو از ارتبا…
❤29
Signed ali
تو سری جدید اسپایدرمن، پیتر بدلیل افسردگی و مشکلات روحی و روانیش دچار جهش های ژنتیکی شده که داره اون روز به سمت غریزه یک عنکبوت سوق میده و باعث شده از نظر فیزیکی رفته رفته به فرم کامل عنکبوت سوق پیدا کنه تا در نهایت به Man-Spider تبدیل بشه که فرم عنکبوتی کامل اون هست. چشم پیتر در این عکس مشکی هست که نشونه جهش ژنتیکیشه که کاملا مشابه چشم مرد زرد پوش در قالب سوفیا شده. با این دو عکس کاملا میشه بطور قطع ثابت کرد عنکبوت …
😍28❤2👌1😭1
Signed ali
یه چیزی برام جالبه که اومدن بازیگر میراندا رو اوردن تا فقط یه سکانس رانندگی رو اجرا کنه و دیگه هیچ سکانسی تو فصل چهارم ازش ندیدم همونو میتونستن یکم بیشتر باهاش کار کنن و بیشتر گذشته تابیتا رو بهمون نشون بدن ولی حیف 🆔 @From_Tv
❤30💔7👌1🙏1
Signed ali
@Alimarvi18 بیاین پیوی پستا و فکتای ارسالیتونو برام بفرستید
Signed ali
پایان سریال و پایان شخصیت مرد زرد پوش از قسمت اول نشون داده شده بخاطر همین نویسنده ها میگن برگردید قسمت اول و ببینید تو قسمت اول عروسک زرد رنگ توسط عروسک قرمز رنگ کشته میشه . این شکست مرد زرد پوش به وسیله اون رعد و برق و نیرو های قرمزه که بعد قطع درخت بطری ها آزاد شده حالا داستان چیه ؟ ما میدونیم بچه ها تو تاریکی بدنیا اومدن و تو تاریکی قربانی شدن و موقع قربانی شدن امید خودشون و ریختن تو ریشه های درخت حالا وقتی درخت …
❤43🔥6
Signed ali
یه ویدیو از ورود بازیگرا به سر صحنه تمرین 🆔 @From_Tv
😍49❤13
Signed ali
امیدوارم پایان فرام مثل پایان سریال دارک نشه تو سریال دارک اون دو نفری که نقش آدم و حوا رو داشتن رفتن به گذشته و آغاز داستانو عوض کردن و باعث شدن جلوی همه اتفاقای شهر گرفته بشه اگه فرام هم قرار باشه یه پایانی مثل اون داشته باشه احتمالا خیلی از سوالا رو بی جواب بزاره و فقط صورت مسئله رو پاک کنن 🆔 @From_Tv
👌47❤4😱1
Signed ali
تابیتا و جید آدم و حوان و درواقع شهر فرام یک نوع باغ عدن فاسد شدست بخاطر همین کابوس ها بعد مرگ واقعی میشن و منبع برق ها به جایی وصل نیستن و دقت کنین برق ها بعد تاریک شدن هوا روشن میشن قسمت هفتم نور تابلوی DINER وقتی بوید شروع به زدن زنگ میکنه روشن میشه . مرد زرد پوش همون مار باغ عدنه که با فریب و وسوسه مردم و به معاملات شیطانی دعوت میکنه . پسر سفید پوش نقش راهنمای خدا رو بازی میکنه و تجسم امید بچه های اولیه است که …
❤47👌5🌚2🙏1
Signed ali
عکس مردو زن که سیب دستشونه یه اشاره داره به آدم و حوا
❤35👌3😍1😎1
Signed ali
پوستر فصل پنجم 🆔 @From_Tv
❤66🔥5
Signed ali
Showing the 12 most recent of 24 posts we hold for @From_Tv. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 237,646 of 1,549,376entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“سریال از جانب | From | فرام” (@From_Tv), 27,160 subscribers as measured 17 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/From_Tv.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.