Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Markus Frohnmaier MdB

@Frohnmaier

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cross-platform identity · Cite this entry

1,529subscribers

-2 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001200677138
TypeChannel
Username@Frohnmaier
Created2 July 2019measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live13 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged2 times, most recently 13 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/Frohnmaier

Growth

1,5291,5311,5307 August 2026 — 1,531 subscribers7 August 2026 — 1,531 subscribers10 August 2026 — 1,529 subscribers7 August 202610 August 2026
3 measurements spanning 3 days, net -2. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,529–1,531 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
10 Aug 2026, 12:521,529-2
7 Aug 2026, 21:211,531no change
7 Aug 2026, 10:021,531first reading

Engagement

21 posts held, back to 7 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
37.7%
avg views ÷ 1,529 subscribers
Avg views / post
576
16 posts measured
Reaction rate
8.21%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
16
of 21 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026
Posts held21 (7 July 20267 August 2026)
Views total9,222
Reactions total757
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken7 Aug 2026, 18:09 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
14m 55s
Average length
1m 09s

Measured directly from 13 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

1,045 reactions across 21 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 68.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍71468.3%
💯12512.0%
👏767.27%
🔥504.78%
424.02%
🤮292.78%
👎60.574%
🏆30.287%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 21 of the 21 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,045reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 21 most recent posts we hold, published 7 July 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

7 Aug 2026, 14:49 UTC149 views26 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video

Vor der Wahl versprechen sie Bürokratieabbau, nach der Wahl blähen sie den Staatsapparat weiter auf – wir brauchen weniger Beamtenstaat, weniger Regulierung und endlich echte Entlastung für Bürger und Unternehmen.

💯20👍6

6 Aug 2026, 14:41 UTC359 views58 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video

Die CDU hat die Staatsbürgerschaft entwertet und die innere Sicherheit vernachlässigt – wir brauchen wieder klare Regeln, konsequente Rückführungen und ein restriktives Staatsangehörigkeitsrecht.

👍49💯9

1 Aug 2026, 17:03 UTC689 views66 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video

Deutschland braucht eine flächendeckende Grenzsicherung: modern, konsequent und unter Einsatz von Drohnenüberwachung. Die USA zeigen, dass illegale Grenzübertritte wirksam eingedämmt werden können. Es ist Zeit, unsere Bürger endlich zu schützen. #AfD #Ceuta

👍633

31 Jul 2026, 18:04 UTC630 views57 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video

Diese Menschen werden nicht in Ceuta bleiben. Viele werden dorthin weiterziehen, wo die höchsten Sozialleistungen locken – auch nach Deutschland. Ich erwarte von der Bundesregierung sofortige Maßnahmen, damit sich 2015 nicht wiederholt. Friedrich Merz muss jetzt beweisen, dass er keine Angela Merkel ist.

👍39🔥6👎5🏆3👏3💯1

31 Jul 2026, 15:58 UTC468 views35 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Mein Interview mit WELT zum Sturm auf Ceuta: https://www.welt.de/politik/ausland/video6a6cae07ef632fe6ede66ff7/tausende-stuermen-ceuta-wir-muessen-vor-allem-druck-auf-die-herkunftsstaaten-ausueben.html

👍35

31 Jul 2026, 15:43 UTC499 views53 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video

Im Gespräch mit WELT fordere ich klare Konsequenzen: Wer seine Grenzen nicht schützt, gefährdet ganz Europa. Spanien muss aus dem Schengen-Raum ausgeschlossen werden & unkooperative Herkunftsstaaten dürfen keine Entwicklungshilfe mehr erhalten.

👍47👏5🔥1

30 Jul 2026, 15:00 UTC672 views39 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Heute Abend wird mein Sommerinterview bei SWR Aktuell Baden-Württemberg ausgestrahlt. Ein zentrales Thema: das deutsche Staatsbürgerschaftsrecht. Für mich ist klar: Die deutsche Staatsbürgerschaft darf nicht zum Ramschartikel werden. Deshalb fordere ich eine deutliche Verschärfung und eine Rückkehr zu den Regelungen von 1999. Es wird unter anderem um Migration, Rückführungen, innere Sicherheit und die wirtschaftlic

👍31👏71

29 Jul 2026, 13:36 UTC523 views49 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video

Eine Partei, die die Einhaltung ihrer Grundsätze nur noch von ihren Wählern und den Bürgern verlangt, aber nicht mehr von ihren eigenen Spitzenpolitikern, hat diese Grundsätze in Wahrheit längst aufgegeben. Meine Meinung zur Debatte Leihmutterschaft und CDU.

💯38👍11

27 Jul 2026, 10:53 UTC619 views45 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video

Deutschland steht für eine Politik des "fliegenden Geldbeutels". Aber Milliarden verteilen erkauft einem keine Gestaltungsmacht.

👍45

25 Jul 2026, 13:54 UTC657 views48 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video

Normale Beziehungen zu Russland sind kein Verrat, sondern deutsches Interesse. Während andere längst die Zeit nach dem Krieg planen, streitet Deutschland noch darüber, ob man überhaupt reden darf.

31👏12💯5

24 Jul 2026, 13:54 UTC651 views61 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video

Frieden entsteht nicht durch Beschimpfungen, sondern durch Diplomatie. Wer Konflikte beenden will, muss reden. Nüchtern, ernsthaft und im deutschen Interesse.

👍61

Showing the 12 most recent of 21 posts we hold for @Frohnmaier. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 783,784 of 1,345,403entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Cross-platform identity — Wikidata

A Wikidata item names this Telegram handle as belonging to the entity it describes. This is Wikidata’s claim, not a verification made by this register — nobody here confirmed that the account is genuinely operated by the entity named. Wikidata content is CC0; every fact below is dated to when it was read from Wikidata, not to when the association was first made there.

Q24540200 on Wikidata, read 9 August 2026
LabelMarkus Frohnmaier
DescriptionGerman politician
X / Twitter@Frohnmaier_AfD
YouTubeUCRxrYW5BXG_gEzJfJ5P9ykg
Official sitehttps://www.markusfrohnmaier.de/

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Markus Frohnmaier MdB” (@Frohnmaier), 1,529 subscribers as measured 10 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Frohnmaier.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.