Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

FreiwilligFrei

@FreiwilligFrei

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

1,715subscribers

-3 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001479043045
TypeChannel
Username@FreiwilligFrei
Created4 June 2020measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 August 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 12 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/FreiwilligFrei

Growth

1,7151,7181,716.56 August 2026 — 1,718 subscribers6 August 2026 — 1,718 subscribers9 August 2026 — 1,717 subscribers12 August 2026 — 1,715 subscribers6 August 202612 August 2026
4 measurements spanning 6 days, net -3. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,715–1,718 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Aug 2026, 15:381,715-2
9 Aug 2026, 11:021,717-1
6 Aug 2026, 11:331,718no change
6 Aug 2026, 09:491,718first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 27 July 2024the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 9 December 2024. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

121 reactions across 15 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 62.8% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍7662.8%
💯1310.7%
129.92%
👏97.44%
🔥43.31%
👎32.48%
🤔32.48%
🏆10.826%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 15 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 121reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 27 July 2024 to 9 December 2024, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

10 Oct 2024, 20:58 UTC≈2,600 views7 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @VoluntaristenDE

Unser Gespräch mit Maximilian Pütz - Freitag 11.10.2024 um 20:30 Uhr! https://youtu.be/5wKprWWjLZE

👍42🔥1

5 Oct 2024, 08:05 UTC≈2,360 views3 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @freiheitsfunken

Manuel Maggio: „Auch heute möchte ich gerne wieder auf das Konzept der Gedankenfetzen zurückgreifen, bestehend aus kurzen Ideen und Eingebungen, die wie Blitze in meinem Geiste auftauchen, während ich diesen Text hier in Echtzeit verfasse.“ https://freiheitsfunken.info/a/22449/

👍2👏1

28 Sept 2024, 08:09 UTC≈2,140 views12 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @freiheitsfunken

Manuel Maggio: „Wenn ich diesees (Polit-) Schauspiel betrachte, erkenne ich keinen Mehrwert für die Freiheit der Menschen, sondern sehe von Macht und Posten besessene Egos, die sich wie kleine Kinder um die besten Plätze im Kasperltheater streiten.“ https://freiheitsfunken.info/a/22432/

👍101👎1

24 Sept 2024, 10:08 UTC≈1,940 views5 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @freiheitsfunken

In diesem Ferngespräch beleuchten Andreas Tank und Manuel Maggio, warum Wahlen kein Weg zur Freiheit sind und wie das Ignorieren politischer Systeme langfristig die Machtstrukturen herausfordert. https://freiheitsfunken.info/a/22422/

👍3🔥2

21 Sept 2024, 07:39 UTC≈1,830 views4 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @freiheitsfunken

Manuel Maggio: „Wie weit wir aktuell von echter geistiger Freiheit entfernt sind, ist heute mein Thema, denn ich erkenne nicht nur einen Zerfall des freien Geistes durch die Denk- und Meinungsdiktatur, sondern sehe hier auch eine klare Verbindung zum zerfallenden Humor.“ https://freiheitsfunken.info/a/22410/

👍4

14 Sept 2024, 06:22 UTC≈1,770 views13 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @freiheitsfunken

Manuel Maggio: „Nimm einem Menschen seine Freiheit, und du nimmst ihm damit auch einen Teil seines Lebens. Es mag vielleicht im ersten Moment etwas zu hart klingen, doch Freiheitsberaubung ist in meinen Augen die Vorstufe zu Mord.“ https://freiheitsfunken.info/a/22391/

👍8💯41

7 Sept 2024, 08:49 UTC≈1,780 views23 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @freiheitsfunken

Manuel Maggio: „Wieso ist es nur so schwer, sich ein Leben ohne Bevormundung, ohne Zwang und Gewalt durch Menschen in Ämtern oder mit seltsamen Verkleidungen, auch Uniformen genannt, vorzustellen? Eigentlich schon traurig, dass noch immer die Staatshörigkeit so etabliert und salonfähig ist.“ https://freiheitsfunken.info/a/22373/

👍174👎1🤔1

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @FreiwilligFrei. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 731,835 of 1,160,990entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“FreiwilligFrei” (@FreiwilligFrei), 1,715 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/FreiwilligFrei.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.