Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for βš’CRYPTO APPS MININGβš’πŸ“±β›πŸ’°

Channel

βš’CRYPTO APPS MININGβš’πŸ“±β›πŸ’°

@FreeminingToken

On this record: Topic Β· Growth Β· Engagement Β· What this channel posts Β· Reactions Β· Stars Β· Posts Β· Citations Β· Telegram's recommendations Β· Cite this entry

9,356subscribers

-1,273 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register Β· movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001807400264
TypeChannel
Username@FreeminingToken
Description⛏️ FREE CRYPTO MINING HUB ⛏️ πŸ“± Start mining from your phone today! βœ… Verified Projects Only πŸ“ˆ Latest Updates & Full Guides 🀜🏾 Get Started πŸ‘‡ https://t.me/FreeminingToken πŸ“©Me @TheMiningExpert πŸ“’ Keep your money safe: We only share FREE opportunities!❌
CreatedBetween 1 October 2022 and 30 September 2023 β€” estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live4 November 2026
Measurements held43
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 4 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/FreeminingToken

Topic

Crypto & trading β€” a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 83% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured β€” it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Growth

9,35610,6299,992.57 August 2026 β€” 10,629 subscribers8 August 2026 β€” 10,617 subscribers9 August 2026 β€” 10,608 subscribers10 August 2026 β€” 10,597 subscribers11 August 2026 β€” 10,579 subscribers11 August 2026 β€” 10,574 subscribers12 August 2026 β€” 10,561 subscribers14 August 2026 β€” 10,553 subscribers15 August 2026 β€” 10,532 subscribers17 August 2026 β€” 10,513 subscribers18 August 2026 β€” 10,499 subscribers19 August 2026 β€” 10,477 subscribers20 August 2026 β€” 10,459 subscribers22 August 2026 β€” 10,448 subscribers23 August 2026 β€” 10,428 subscribers25 August 2026 β€” 10,412 subscribers26 August 2026 β€” 10,396 subscribers27 August 2026 β€” 10,381 subscribers28 August 2026 β€” 10,373 subscribers29 August 2026 β€” 10,362 subscribers30 August 2026 β€” 10,350 subscribers31 August 2026 β€” 10,333 subscribers1 September 2026 β€” 10,322 subscribers2 September 2026 β€” 10,299 subscribers3 September 2026 β€” 10,276 subscribers5 September 2026 β€” 10,256 subscribers8 September 2026 β€” 10,205 subscribers11 September 2026 β€” 10,178 subscribers13 September 2026 β€” 10,143 subscribers14 September 2026 β€” 10,128 subscribers16 September 2026 β€” 10,107 subscribers19 September 2026 β€” 10,078 subscribers26 September 2026 β€” 10,003 subscribers4 October 2026 β€” 9,850 subscribers10 October 2026 β€” 9,766 subscribers14 October 2026 β€” 9,706 subscribers17 October 2026 β€” 9,657 subscribers20 October 2026 β€” 9,606 subscribers23 October 2026 β€” 9,557 subscribers25 October 2026 β€” 9,519 subscribers29 October 2026 β€” 9,462 subscribers1 November 2026 β€” 9,412 subscribers4 November 2026 β€” 9,356 subscribers7 August 20264 November 2026
43 measurements spanning 89 days, net -1,273. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between β€” snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean β€œno change observed”, never β€œinterpolated”. The vertical axis spans 9,165–10,820 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log β€” every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 43
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
4 Nov 2026, 04:009,356-56
1 Nov 2026, 00:369,412-50
29 Oct 2026, 00:179,462-57
25 Oct 2026, 15:069,519-38
23 Oct 2026, 01:409,557-49
20 Oct 2026, 11:299,606-51
17 Oct 2026, 08:459,657-49
14 Oct 2026, 09:569,706-60
10 Oct 2026, 12:209,766-84
4 Oct 2026, 11:189,850-153
26 Sept 2026, 02:4210,003-75
19 Sept 2026, 05:1610,078-29
16 Sept 2026, 16:0010,107-21
14 Sept 2026, 20:3610,128-15
13 Sept 2026, 07:1710,143-35
11 Sept 2026, 11:3810,178-27
8 Sept 2026, 21:2110,205-51
5 Sept 2026, 11:1810,256-20
3 Sept 2026, 16:1510,276-23
2 Sept 2026, 07:1510,299first reading

Engagement

59 posts held, back to 28 July 2026 β€” the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 45 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR Β· 30 days
3.06%
avg views Γ· 9,356 subscribers
Avg views / post
287
12 posts measured
Reaction rate
4.39%
reactions Γ· views Β· ER floor
Posts in window
14
of 59 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) Γ· views β€” note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days Β· latest post in window 5 November 2026
Posts held59 (28 July 2026 – 5 November 2026)
Views total3,438
Reactions total151
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface β€” not measured, not estimated
Readings taken6 Nov 2026, 22:13 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than β€œcorrecting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form β€” 8.12K, 3.7M β€” so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded β€” read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
β‰ˆ9,940
Videos
β‰ˆ205
Links
β‰ˆ3,820

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 6 November 2026 β€” not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked β‰ˆ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it β€” t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so β‰ˆ142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Reaction mix

687 reactions across 57 posts, in 16 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 24.5% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❀16824.5%
πŸ‘10515.3%
❀‍πŸ”₯639.17%
πŸ’―608.73%
🀝578.30%
πŸ™446.40%
πŸ”₯415.97%
⚑314.51%
β˜ƒ213.06%
πŸ†213.06%
✍182.62%
🐳131.89%
πŸ•Š131.89%
πŸ₯°131.89%
πŸ‘¨β€πŸ’»121.75%
πŸ€—71.02%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities β€” πŸ™ is thanks in one channel and mourning in another β€” so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one β€” 4.34K, 1.2M β€” so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 57 of the 59 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post β€” not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above β€” those same posts carry 687 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by β€œa reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 59 most recent posts we hold, published 28 July 2026 to 5 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
2
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 57 we hold a reading for Β· 2%
Most on one post
2
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars β€” bought with money β€” on a post by @FreeminingToken. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 59 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 28 July 2026 to 5 November 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own β€˜edited’ marker: 1 of 14 posts held from the last 30 days (7.14%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before β€” this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

5 Nov 2026, 09:47 UTC175 views13 reactionsread 6 November 2026
Photo

πŸš¨πŸ™‹β€β™‚οΈ VERYCHAT PRICE LISTING POTENTIAL ⛏️ Are you guys really getting into this mining? While some are sleeping on @Verylabs others are hard at work building up their $VERY! Here's a look at how much $VERY could be worth once listed! VERYCHAT PRICE PREDICTION $0.20 = ₦300 😍 $0.50 = ₦750 πŸ”₯ $1.00 = ₦1500 πŸš€ These are just examples of what the price could be. This is not confirmed at listing. The price could be e…

πŸ”₯5πŸ’―3β˜ƒ1🐳1πŸ•Š1🀝1πŸ₯°1

4 Nov 2026, 14:37 UTCviews β€”

βš’CRYPTO APPS MININGβš’πŸ“±β›πŸ’° pinned Β«πŸ’― Hello my friends πŸ™‹β€β™‚οΈ This account belongs to one of my friends. He is trustworthy and sells any quantity you need of Rubi Network, SidraChain, and VeryChat coins. He only sells, he does not buy, and the minimum quantity he sells is 1000 coins and above.…»

4 Nov 2026, 14:36 UTC230 views12 reactionsread 6 November 2026

πŸ’― Hello my friends πŸ™‹β€β™‚οΈ This account belongs to one of my friends. He is trustworthy and sells any quantity you need of Rubi Network, SidraChain, and VeryChat coins. He only sells, he does not buy, and the minimum quantity he sells is 1000 coins and above. The person is reliable, and you can deal with him safely.πŸ’― πŸ™‹β€β™‚οΈ If you are a fan of holding Rubi Network, SidraChain, and VeryChat, I highly recommend this person…

🀝4❀3⚑1❀‍πŸ”₯1πŸ†1πŸ’―1πŸ™1

3 Nov 2026, 11:14 UTC279 views13 reactionsread 6 November 2026
Photo

πŸš¨πŸ“£ OFFICIAL GUIDE: HOW TO CLAIM YOUR TRANSFERABLE $ITLG Good news, Linkers! $ITLG is getting ready to become transferable. Follow these simple steps to complete your verification and prepare to claim your transferable tokens. STEP 1: Open ITLG KYC 1. Open your InterLink app. 2. Go to the Marketplace / DApp section. 3. Find ITLG KYC under Hot Apps. 4. Tap Open. STEP 2: Sign In 1. Tap Sign In. 2. Log in using your…

❀5❀‍πŸ”₯2πŸ‘2πŸ‘¨β€πŸ’»1πŸ’―1🀝1πŸ™1

2 Nov 2026, 11:20 UTC296 views11 reactionsread 6 November 2026

🚨🚨🚨 I removed Bee Network's currency from the projects list, the application was deleted, and they were reported.πŸ‘ https://t.me/FreeminingToken/10505

πŸ‘4❀‍πŸ”₯2❀1πŸ†1πŸ’―1🀝1πŸ™1

2 Nov 2026, 09:45 UTCviews β€”

βš’CRYPTO APPS MININGβš’πŸ“±β›πŸ’° pinned Β«πŸš¨πŸ™‹β€β™‚οΈ My friends, a fierce campaign started on Twitter a week ago to report all of these projects. What should you do now? Submit a report across all social media platforms, as well as Google Play Store and Apple App Store, and write: 'This project is a scam.'…»

2 Nov 2026, 09:45 UTC311 views10 reactionsread 6 November 2026

πŸš¨πŸ™‹β€β™‚οΈ My friends, a fierce campaign started on Twitter a week ago to report all of these projects. What should you do now? Submit a report across all social media platforms, as well as Google Play Store and Apple App Store, and write: 'This project is a scam.' Everyone must participate to stop these fraudulent projects. Since last week, influencers on Twitter have started taking down these projects and reporting them…

πŸ‘3⚑1❀1❀‍πŸ”₯1πŸ†1πŸ’―1🀝1πŸ™1

2 Nov 2026, 09:09 UTC305 views11 reactionsread 6 November 2026

❌️🀬 Atoshi generates significant monthly profits from its miners after six years of mining, yet the team continues to refuse to list the coin.πŸ‘‡ ➑️ If we hypothetically assume that only 10 million of these users log in daily and watch 20 ads each, with a very low average ad revenue (eCPM) of, say, $2 per 1,000 impressions: β€’ Total Daily Ads: 10,000,000 users Γ— 20 ads = 200 million views per day. β€’ Daily Earnings for …

❀‍πŸ”₯3❀2πŸ‘2⚑1πŸ†1🀝1πŸ™1

2 Nov 2026, 09:01 UTC273 views11 reactionsread 6 November 2026

❌️🀬 Bee Network generates significant monthly profits from its miners after six years of mining, yet the team continues to refuse to list the coin.πŸ‘‡ ➑️ If we hypothetically assume that only 10 million of these users log in daily and watch 20 ads each, with a very low average ad revenue (eCPM) of, say, $2 per 1,000 impressions: β€’ Total Daily Ads: 10,000,000 users Γ— 20 ads = 200 million views per day. β€’ Daily Earnings…

❀‍πŸ”₯3πŸ‘2πŸ’―2✍1❀1🀝1πŸ™1

1 Nov 2026, 13:42 UTC343 views17 reactionsread 6 November 2026

❌️🚨 Make sure you uninstall these useless projects before 2027πŸš¨πŸ›‘ 1. TokCoin 2. Tau Network 3. YeBlock β€” ⚠️ DEAD FOREVER 4. Bitpixel Network 5. Sprout Network 6. Torium Network β€” ⚠️ DEAD FOREVER 7. Pico 8. Tikchain 9. Ari Wallet β€” ⚠️ DEAD FOREVER 10. Xenea Wallet 11. Grass Network 12. Cpen Network 13. Mirex Network 14. Uorm 15. SixSeven Bot 16. Qubed Network 17. Mirex Network 18. Oreum Network 19. Orex Network 20. Px…

❀9πŸ™2β˜ƒ1✍1❀‍πŸ”₯1πŸ‘1πŸ’―1🀝1

1 Nov 2026, 13:38 UTC298 views12 reactionsread 6 November 2026

🚨 If you mined any of these scam projects, you're a legend πŸ’ͺ πŸ₯Š 1. Alpha Network 2. Star Network 3. Cow Network 5. SparkchainAi 6. CakeCore 7. Bee Network 8. Over protocol 9. Imota 10. BidaCoin 11. SuperEx 12. Co-Met Network 13. Verdacity 14. Avive Network 15. Ice Network 16. OEX 17. ALend Most of these mining Apps came around 2021/2022. Most of us mined all these but never gave up and still grinding πŸ’ͺ We've had ou…

❀4πŸ‘2✍1❀‍πŸ”₯1πŸ‘¨β€πŸ’»1πŸ’―1🀝1πŸ™1

1 Nov 2026, 09:46 UTC287 views18 reactionsread 6 November 2026
Photo

πŸ’Ž RUBI NETWORK - REAL SUPPLY CLARIFICATION πŸ’Ž Many miners are confused about total supply. Here is the reality as of today (01 Nov 2025): Total Exploited: 392,898,666 RBP Unverified (74.64%) = 293,262,584 RBP βœ… Verified + On Chain = 99,636,081 RBP ONLY This 99.6M is the REAL Total Supply that will be considered till listing. IMPORTANT: Rubi has NO FIXED SUPPLY. Supply depends on miners. Only verified RBP migrate…

❀7❀‍πŸ”₯4πŸ‘3πŸ‘¨β€πŸ’»1πŸ’―1🀝1πŸ™1

Showing the 12 most recent of 59 posts we hold for @FreeminingToken. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked β‰ˆ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it β€” t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so β‰ˆ1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel β€” every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched β€” that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason β€” naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides β€” the β€œNamed by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly β€” each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

"Ω„ΨΉΩ„ΩŠ Ψ£ΩΩŠΨ―Ωƒ" Clinical discussion
@l3lee_afeedk Β· 26,476
Telegram ranks this channel #52 of 67 here β€” alongside 66 others β€” read 12 September 2026

This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one β€” see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 4 November 2026 β€” this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

β€œβš’CRYPTO APPS MININGβš’πŸ“±β›πŸ’°β€ (@FreeminingToken), 9,356 subscribers as measured 4 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/FreeminingToken.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV Β· JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.