Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Амир пилит. Фриланс × Ai × Дизайн

Channel

Амир пилит. Фриланс × Ai × Дизайн

@Freelancee

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

7,554subscribers

-294 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001122392687
TypeChannel
Username@Freelancee
DescriptionПро дизайн, ai и заработок простыми словами) По всем вопросам: t.me/islamovtg
CreatedBetween 1 June 2017 and 30 April 2020 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live13 November 2026
Measurements held28
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 13 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/Freelancee

Topic

Technology — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 12 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 36% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Growth

7,5547,8487,7016 August 2026 — 7,848 subscribers6 August 2026 — 7,848 subscribers6 August 2026 — 7,847 subscribers10 August 2026 — 7,839 subscribers13 August 2026 — 7,833 subscribers16 August 2026 — 7,823 subscribers19 August 2026 — 7,815 subscribers22 August 2026 — 7,799 subscribers25 August 2026 — 7,791 subscribers29 August 2026 — 7,782 subscribers31 August 2026 — 7,775 subscribers4 September 2026 — 7,767 subscribers10 September 2026 — 7,752 subscribers13 September 2026 — 7,739 subscribers17 September 2026 — 7,733 subscribers26 September 2026 — 7,720 subscribers5 October 2026 — 7,675 subscribers12 October 2026 — 7,664 subscribers15 October 2026 — 7,667 subscribers18 October 2026 — 7,653 subscribers20 October 2026 — 7,638 subscribers23 October 2026 — 7,629 subscribers26 October 2026 — 7,604 subscribers29 October 2026 — 7,601 subscribers1 November 2026 — 7,590 subscribers5 November 2026 — 7,580 subscribers8 November 2026 — 7,578 subscribers13 November 2026 — 7,554 subscribers6 August 202613 November 2026
28 measurements spanning 100 days, net -294. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 7,510–7,892 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 28
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
13 Nov 2026, 18:097,554-24
8 Nov 2026, 22:217,578-2
5 Nov 2026, 10:597,580-10
1 Nov 2026, 23:577,590-11
29 Oct 2026, 15:497,601-3
26 Oct 2026, 10:557,604-25
23 Oct 2026, 18:217,629-9
20 Oct 2026, 14:567,638-15
18 Oct 2026, 00:507,653-14
15 Oct 2026, 06:267,667+3
12 Oct 2026, 03:177,664-11
5 Oct 2026, 04:007,675-45
26 Sept 2026, 06:547,720-13
17 Sept 2026, 16:377,733-6
13 Sept 2026, 15:007,739-13
10 Sept 2026, 01:407,752-15
4 Sept 2026, 08:177,767-8
31 Aug 2026, 21:167,775-7
29 Aug 2026, 02:387,782-9
25 Aug 2026, 22:557,791first reading

Engagement

25 posts held, back to 7 December 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 42 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
11.2%
avg views ÷ 7,554 subscribers
Avg views / post
848
8 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.39%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
8
of 25 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 9 November 2026
Posts held25 (7 December 2025 – 9 November 2026)
Views total6,784
Reactions total162
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken15 Nov 2026, 08:00 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
745
Videos
53
Links
297

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 15 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Video runtime
19s
Average length
19s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

779 reactions across 24 posts, in 16 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 25.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🤣19725.3%
❤17522.5%
🔥14819.0%
👍9311.9%
💯567.19%
😭455.78%
😡324.11%
😨111.41%
😍60.77%
🙏40.513%
😱30.385%
🤝30.385%
🏆20.257%
🤗20.257%
🆒10.128%
👏10.128%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 24 of the 25 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 779 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 25 most recent posts we hold, published 7 December 2025 to 9 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 2 of 8 posts held from the last 30 days (25.0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

9 Nov 2026, 21:37 UTC542 views3 reactionsread 15 November 2026

Да конечно) все починится.

❤3

9 Nov 2026, 21:37 UTC545 views13 reactionsread 15 November 2026

Крепись, брат, у меня тоже на днях котенок кусанул экран. Обидно, конечно, но это всего-лишь вещь. А кошка — это кошка

❤13

9 Nov 2026, 21:30 UTC≈1,020 views12 reactionsread 15 November 2026
Photo

Кошка сегодня пообедала моим маком. Именно сегодня я навайбкодил ей игру. Не оценила получается😅

😭12

2 Nov 2026, 12:40 UTC869 views10 reactionsread 15 November 2026

Мне больше не нужно двигать пиксели. Теперь я их ищу 😅 Заметил, что чем больше дизайню вместе с ИИ, тем реже открываю фигму Раньше: сначала макет, потом всё остальное. Сейчас пишу Claude «сделай экран настроек», смотрю, что вышло, и уже по живому говорю «тут отступы кривые, переделай». Анализ референсов сместился на этап ниже. Дизайнерский глаз никуда не делся. Просто теперь он работает прямо в приложении. Ты ка…

❤10

1 Nov 2026, 09:45 UTC868 views19 reactionsread 15 November 2026
Photo

Итак. Погнали. По проектам Самое нишевое мое приложение появилось, потому что я не смог нормально вести список фильмов) Я тот еще задрот в формировании списков всего на свете, может модное нынче СДВГ, может еще что-то. Пробовал Notion, заметки и даже Excel, все не то, все говно. Потом в рекламе попалась апка, идеальная по сценарию, но ужасная по дизайну и удобству (проф. деформация, ничего не поделаешь). Как обычно,…

❤13🔥4👍2

30 Oct 2026, 08:11 UTC760 views59 reactionsread 15 November 2026
Photo

Пока все спорят, заменит ли ИИ дизайнеров, я тихонько сделал на нём херову тучу всякого, вот пока самые основные 😅 Пишет всё Claude, а я ставлю задачи и с умным видом говорю «тут кнопка кривая, переделай». Дизайнерский бэкграунд хоть где-то пригодился) Что в итоге напилил: SxFont. Менеджер шрифтов для мака. Уже продаётся, сейчас допиливаю английский сайт и хочу попробовать за бугор. NanoBanana. Бот для генерации …

❤41👍11🔥7

23 Oct 2026, 19:43 UTC≈1,000 views13 reactionsread 15 November 2026
Photo

Привет. Сегодня запустил бота для генерации картинок в NanoBanana) В целом это будет больше для тех, кто хочет штучно что-то создавать, а не для дизайнеров с подписками. Но сейчас нужен ваш тест. 👑 Вот по этой ссылке даю бесплатно пончиков на пару генераций + жирная скидка на будущие пакеты. (Ограничено до 200 человек и до конца месяца)

❤11😍1🙏1

20 Oct 2026, 08:26 UTC≈1,180 views33 reactionsread 15 November 2026
Photo

Я уверен, что для дизайнеров, которые не делают поиск в больших формах есть отдельный котел в аду ) А для тех, кто еще и сбрасывает все поля после обновления страницы, пусть котел будет на 10 размеров меньше 😳 Уепки, чтоб вас первыми Ai заменил.

🤣20💯12👍1

27 Sept 2026, 08:20 UTC≈2,100 views18 reactionsread 15 November 2026

Сначала я создал отдельный канал, где писал про Ai. Затем весь основной контент переехал туда) Я уже смирился, что моя вечная проблема - это неумение долго концентрироваться на одном. Это стало и моим минусом и плюсом одновременно. Я снова и снова натыкаюсь на эти грабли) Создаю площадку и забрасываю другую 😄 Невозможно удержать фокус везде и сразу. Понимаю. Но ничего не могу поделать. Но пишу чаще теперь я здесь …

🔥10❤6👍1😍1

21 Jul 2026, 15:42 UTC≈4,890 views16 reactionsread 15 November 2026

Посоветуйте хостинг годный) цена=качество. Два условия: 1) Находится не в РФ 2) Работает в РФ без всяких КВНов. 3) Удобный интерфейс, а не дебри Можно и рефералку)

❤5🔥3🤣2😱2🏆1💯1😡1🙏1

21 Apr 2026, 09:50 UTC≈7,670 views57 reactionsread 15 November 2026

Последние пару лет я перестал плотно заниматься дизайном. Не бросил полностью, но коммерческий дизайн отложил на дальнюю полку. Поэтому PRO веб-дизайн уже не актуально. Да и просто «про фриланс» тож) Напомню, что по делам сейчас. Сначала ушёл в телеграм-каналы. И как-то незаметно получилось собрать одну из крупнейших сеток в дизайн-тематике (200 000+ подписчиков). Сеть никуда не делась, продолжаю работу. Но рынок за…

❤31👍13🔥11🤗1🤣1

21 Apr 2026, 09:36 UTCviews —

Channel name was changed to «Амир пилит. Фриланс × Ai × Дизайн»

Showing the 12 most recent of 25 posts we hold for @Freelancee. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Лови исходники!
@Ishoddesign · 31,275
Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 5 September 2026
Архив шрифтов
@fontdisk · 19,353
Telegram ranks this channel #28 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 3 October 2026
Секси-шрифт. Кириллица
@sexyfont · 133,759
Telegram ranks this channel #35 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 13 August 2026
Секси-цвет. Твое вдохновение
@sexycolors · 36,598
Telegram ranks this channel #56 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 1 September 2026
Ким Воронин | A+
@Voroninkim · 37,324
Telegram ranks this channel #76 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 31 August 2026
Дизайн-гусь
@designgoose · 22,661
Telegram ranks this channel #90 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 19 September 2026

This channel appears in 6 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Амир пилит. Фриланс × Ai × Дизайн” (@Freelancee), 7,554 subscribers as measured 13 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Freelancee.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.