Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

раздачи 𝑽𝒐𝒓𝒕𝒌𝒓𝒊𝒔

@FreeNftchanell

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

284subscribers

-1 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002588323978
TypeChannel
Username@FreeNftchanell
Description𝚙𝚘𝚍𝚊𝚛𝚔𝚒 𝚘𝚝 Vortex Лс @Vortex533 Буст: https://t.me/boost/FreeNftchanell Чат: https://t.me/Rozigrise
CreatedBetween 1 March 2025 and 31 July 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live8 August 2026
Measurements held3
On Telegramt.me/FreeNftchanell

Growth

284285284.57 Aug 2026, 16:21 — 285 subscribers8 Aug 2026, 07:10 — 284 subscribers8 Aug 2026, 08:30 — 284 subscribers7 Aug 2026, 16:218 Aug 2026, 08:30
3 measurements taken within a single day, net -1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 284–285 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
8 Aug 2026, 08:30284no change
8 Aug 2026, 07:10284-1
7 Aug 2026, 16:21285first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 15 February 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 8 June 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Photos
8
Videos
2
Links
33

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Reaction mix

32 reactions across 12 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 53.1% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 49004098820264445061753.1%
custom 5289755685385438088825.0%
custom 5379580210507172268412.5%
custom 530100838373682783526.25%
custom 541595994500894444013.13%

Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 12 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 32reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 15 February 2026 to 8 June 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

8 Jun 2026, 22:41 UTC53 views1 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Кто поможет в рефералкой

custom 49004098820264445061

Signed Vortex

5 Jun 2026, 21:35 UTC75 views1 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Нормально так

custom 49004098820264445061

Signed Vortex

5 Jun 2026, 21:34 UTC77 views1 reactionsread 8 August 2026

хахахахаха я увидела просто в чатах тгк и решила кого то быстренько обрадовать

custom 49004098820264445061

Signed 𝒦

5 Jun 2026, 21:34 UTC76 views1 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Вот эта халява

custom 54159599450089444401

Signed Vortex

5 Jun 2026, 21:34 UTC73 views1 reactionsread 8 August 2026

спустя пару месяцев делаю

custom 49004098820264445061

Signed 𝒦

5 Jun 2026, 21:34 UTC65 views2 reactionsread 8 August 2026

мишка/сердечко

custom 52897556853854380882

Signed Best Random Bot 🎁 [Конкурсный бот для розыгрышей | Рандомайзер]

25 Mar 2026, 13:00 UTC186 views2 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Улучшение на факела

custom 49004098820264445062

Signed Vortex

19 Mar 2026, 12:20 UTC149 viewsread 8 August 2026

Улучшение на фламинго вышли просто)

Signed Vortex

19 Mar 2026, 12:19 UTC133 viewsread 8 August 2026

хахахах неужели вернуть эру подарков

Signed #кристмас🐶

19 Mar 2026, 12:08 UTC127 viewsread 8 August 2026

Первый кто кинет 2 мишки удвою звёзды @vortex533

Signed Vortex

28 Feb 2026, 11:25 UTC183 views6 reactionsread 8 August 2026

пр ребятки,как вы там?

custom 52897556853854380885custom 49004098820264445061

Signed #кристмас🐶

23 Feb 2026, 10:15 UTC215 views10 reactionsread 8 August 2026

с 23 февраля,пацанчики❤️ рандомному мальчику с коммов-мишка

custom 49004098820264445066custom 53010083837368278352custom 53795802105071722682

Signed #кристмас🐶

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @FreeNftchanell. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 997,716 of 1,340,412entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“раздачи 𝑽𝒐𝒓𝒕𝒌𝒓𝒊𝒔” (@FreeNftchanell), 284 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/FreeNftchanell.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.