Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for ๐˜พ๐™๐™„๐˜พ๐™†๐™€๐™ ๐™๐™„๐™‹๐™Ž ๐Ÿณ

Channel

๐˜พ๐™๐™„๐˜พ๐™†๐™€๐™ ๐™๐™„๐™‹๐™Ž ๐Ÿณ

@FreeCricketTips7

On this record: Topic ยท Observations ยท Channels linked by matching posts ยท Growth ยท Engagement ยท What this channel posts ยท Reactions ยท Posts ยท Posts recorded as deleted ยท Citations ยท Telegram's recommendations ยท Cite this entry

50,744subscribers

+637 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register ยท movement among entries of 31,623โ€“100,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001182482232
TypeChannel
Username@FreeCricketTips7
Descriptionแด„แดษดแด›แด€แด„แด› แดœ๊œฑ แดษด แดกสœแด€แด›๊œฑแด€แด˜แด˜ ๊œฐแดส€ ษขส€แดแดœแด˜ แดŠแดษชษดษชษดษข ๐Ÿ‘‰ https://wa.me/639555531130 แดกแด‡ส™๊œฑษชแด›แด‡ ๐Ÿ‘‰ www.cricketbettingtips7.com Disclaimer: All content on this channel is for entertainment & informational purposes only. Not for real money games
CreatedBetween 1 April 2018 and 31 July 2021 โ€” estimated from Telegramโ€™s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live11 November 2026
Measurements held63
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 11 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/FreeCricketTips7

Topic

Gambling & betting โ€” a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channelโ€™s own recent posts on 10 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 84% confidence. This is a modelโ€™s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured โ€” it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Observations

These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.

Views per post sit far above this size band

36,800 average views per post against 52,072 subscribers โ€” an engagement rate of 70.7%. Across the 3,503 registered channels in the same cohort โ€” 31,629โ€“99,976 subscribers, posting mainly in English โ€” the middle half sit between 1.78% and 11.2%, with a median of 5.00%.

What this was computed from
Window30 days (6 October 2026 โ€“ 5 November 2026)
Posts measured30 of 30 published in the window (0 exact, 30 rounded by Telegram)
Views totalled1,104,500
Mature posts only70.7% over 30 posts read at least 24h after publication
Subscribers52,072 measured 5 November 2026
Cohortb31623:eng ยท 3,503 channels ยท p10 0.479% ยท p25 1.78% ยท p50 5.00% ยท p75 11.2% ยท p90 20.2%
Position in cohort99.714th percentile ยท 14.1ร— the cohort median
Uncertaintyยฑ0.057% of the figure, from Telegramโ€™s rounding
Post languageEnglish ยท 100.0% of the windowโ€™s posts

When this is recorded. A channel is listed here only when its engagement rate sits at or above the 99th percentile of its cohort and is at least 3ร— away from that cohortโ€™s median โ€” above it โ€” on both the all-readings figure and the mature-only figure. The percentile alone would be circular: a percentile cut puts the same share of every cohort in the tail whatever the data looks like. The distance from the median is what makes it a statement about this channel.

This is not a verdict, and the direction is not a quality signal. A low rate has many innocent causes โ€” audiences that read in the Telegram app without opening the channel, a subscriber base built long before the current output, an audience in a different timezone from our reading. A high rate has innocent causes too: a post that travelled far beyond the channelโ€™s own subscribers will do it. We publish the measurement and the distribution it sits in. The full cohort baselines are downloadable, so this comparison can be reproduced rather than trusted.

Recorded under the key err_high, last confirmed 5 November 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through โ€” we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.

Channels linked by matching posts

This channel is in a group of 2 registered channels linked by matching posts. Links are found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register.

Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown in this list. โ€œFirstโ€ could only mean first in our own crawl, which depends on how deep we happened to reach into each channelโ€™s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. Our one hand-check read 45 of the highest-confidence flagged pairs against the live Telegram pages. In 18 of them the live page showed a โ€œForwarded fromโ€ credit that our database had no record of, so reading that pair as an unattributed copy was wrong; the check did not measure who published first. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Near-verbatim matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying โ€” a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story โ€” and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.

Growth

45,61882,86764,242.550,7447 August 202611 November 2026
63 measurements spanning 96 days, net +637. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between โ€” snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean โ€œno change observedโ€, never โ€œinterpolatedโ€. The vertical axis spans 40,031โ€“88,454 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log โ€” every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 63
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
11 Nov 2026, 09:3950,744-31,605
9 Nov 2026, 17:3982,349-518
8 Nov 2026, 13:0782,867+5,984
7 Nov 2026, 08:4976,883+24,150
6 Nov 2026, 07:5652,733+661
5 Nov 2026, 08:4052,072-769
4 Nov 2026, 10:0552,841-344
3 Nov 2026, 08:0853,185-691
2 Nov 2026, 08:5653,876+154
1 Nov 2026, 06:3553,722+526
31 Oct 2026, 10:0553,196-847
30 Oct 2026, 12:4754,043+1,169
29 Oct 2026, 15:3952,874-754
28 Oct 2026, 14:2853,628+528
27 Oct 2026, 12:1653,100-690
26 Oct 2026, 11:0653,790+882
25 Oct 2026, 10:4652,908-661
24 Oct 2026, 07:2653,569+578
23 Oct 2026, 09:1752,991+831
22 Oct 2026, 07:3852,160first reading

Engagement

129 posts held, back to 31 July 2026 โ€” the reader has not yet reached the start of this channelโ€™s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 198 pages of Telegramโ€™s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR ยท 30 days
71.7%
avg views รท 50,744 subscribers
Avg views / post
36,400
32 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.13%
reactions รท views ยท ER floor
Posts in window
36
of 129 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) รท views โ€” note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegramโ€™s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days ยท latest post in window 12 November 2026
Posts held129 (31 July 2026 โ€“ 12 November 2026)
Views total1,163,500
Reactions total24,747
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface โ€” not measured, not estimated
Readings taken13 Nov 2026, 17:29 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than โ€œcorrectingโ€ the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form โ€” 8.12K, 3.7M โ€” so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded โ€” read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
169
Links
20

Lifetime counters from Telegramโ€™s own channel header, read 13 November 2026 โ€” not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegramโ€™s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Reaction mix

99,250 reactions across 125 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 55.6% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
โค55,18555.6%
๐Ÿ‘44,06544.4%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities โ€” ๐Ÿ™ is thanks in one channel and mourning in another โ€” so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one โ€” 4.34K, 1.2M โ€” so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 125 of the 129 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegramโ€™s own count on each post โ€” not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above โ€” those same posts carry 99,250 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by โ€œa reaction total printed elsewhere on the pageโ€.

Measured over the 129 most recent posts we hold, published 31 July 2026 to 12 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

Telegramโ€™s own โ€˜editedโ€™ marker: 1 of 36 posts held from the last 30 days (2.78%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before โ€” this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

12 Nov 2026, 07:35 UTCโ‰ˆ28,300 views534 reactionsread 13 November 2026
Photo

๐—•๐—ฎ๐—ฐ๐—ธ ๐˜๐—ผ ๐—•๐—ฎ๐—ฐ๐—ธ ๐—ฃ๐—ฎ๐˜€๐˜€ ๐—ผ๐—ป ๐—ช๐—ต๐—ฎ๐˜๐˜€๐—”๐—ฝ๐—ฝ ๐—ด๐—ฟ๐—ผ๐˜‚๐—ฝ, ๐—œ๐—ณ ๐—ฌ๐—ผ๐˜‚ ๐—ช๐—ฎ๐—ป๐˜ ๐—ง๐—ผ ๐—๐—ผ๐—ถ๐—ป ๐—ฃ๐—ฎ๐—ถ๐—ฑ ๐—š๐—ฟ๐—ผ๐˜‚๐—ฝ, ๐—ช๐—ต๐—ฎ๐˜๐˜€๐—”๐—ฝ๐—ฝ ๐—ข๐—ป ๐Ÿ‘‰ https://wa.me/639555531130

๐Ÿ‘334โค200

11 Nov 2026, 13:28 UTCviews โ€”

๐˜พ๐™๐™„๐˜พ๐™†๐™€๐™ ๐™๐™„๐™‹๐™Ž ๐Ÿณ pinned ยซยป

11 Nov 2026, 12:40 UTCโ‰ˆ32,600 views708 reactionsread 13 November 2026

Posted without readable text

โค428๐Ÿ‘280

11 Nov 2026, 12:07 UTCโ‰ˆ34,400 views775 reactionsread 13 November 2026

Posted without readable text

โค465๐Ÿ‘310

11 Nov 2026, 11:11 UTCโ‰ˆ34,700 views714 reactionsread 13 November 2026
Photo

๐—ฃ๐—ฒ๐—ฟ๐˜๐—ต ๐˜€๐—ฐ๐—ผ๐—ฟ๐—ฐ๐—ต๐—ฒ๐—ฟ๐˜€ ๐˜ƒ๐˜€ ๐—ฆ๐˜†๐—ฑ๐—ป๐—ฒ๐˜† ๐˜๐—ต๐˜‚๐—ป๐—ฑ๐—ฒ๐—ฟ, ๐Ÿญ๐Ÿด๐˜๐—ต ๐—บ๐—ฎ๐˜๐—ฐ๐—ต ๐—ผ๐—ณ ๐˜„๐—ฏ๐—ฏ๐—น- ๐—ฝ๐—ฎ๐˜€๐˜€ ๐—ผ๐—ป ๐—ช๐—ต๐—ฎ๐˜๐˜€๐—”๐—ฝ๐—ฝ ๐—ด๐—ฟ๐—ผ๐˜‚๐—ฝ ๐—™๐—ฟ๐—ฒ๐—ฒ/๐—ผ๐—ฝ๐—ฒ๐—ป ๐˜๐—ถ๐—ฝ๐˜€ ๐˜„๐—ถ๐—น๐—น ๐—ฏ๐—ฒ ๐—ฝ๐—ผ๐˜€๐˜ ๐—ฎ๐—ณ๐˜๐—ฒ๐—ฟ ๐˜€๐—ผ๐—บ๐—ฒ ๐—ฑ๐—ฎ๐˜†๐˜€, ๐˜๐—ถ๐—น๐—น ๐˜๐—ต๐—ฒ๐—ป ๐—ผ๐—ป๐—น๐˜† ๐—ผ๐—ป ๐—ฝ๐—ฎ๐—ถ๐—ฑ ๐—ด๐—ฟ๐—ผ๐˜‚๐—ฝ, ๐—œ๐—ณ ๐—ฌ๐—ผ๐˜‚ ๐—ช๐—ฎ๐—ป๐˜ ๐—ง๐—ผ ๐—๐—ผ๐—ถ๐—ป ๐—ช๐—ต๐—ฎ๐˜๐˜€๐—”๐—ฝ๐—ฝ ๐—ฃ๐—ฎ๐—ถ๐—ฑ ๐—š๐—ฟ๐—ผ๐˜‚๐—ฝ ๐——๐—  ๐—ข๐—ป ๐Ÿ‘‰ https://wa.me/639555531130 แตˆแต’โฟ'แต— แถœแตƒหกหก แต’สณ แตหขแต แถ แต’สณ แตˆแต‰แตแต’ แต—สณโฑแตƒหก & โฟแต˜แตแต‡แต‰สณ สทโฑหกหก แต‡แต‰ แต’แถ แถ  แตˆแต˜สณโฑโฟแต แต—สฐแต‰ แตแตƒแต—แถœสฐ |แŠ ๐™ต๐™ธ๐š‡๐šƒ๐š„๐š๐™ด๐š‚ แŠ| แด€แดœ๊œฑ แด…แดแดแด‡๊œฑแด›ษชแด„ แดแด…ษช แด„แดœแด˜ แด„๊œฑแด€ แด›20 แด„สœแด€สŸสŸแด‡ษดษขแด‡ ษดแด˜สŸ แดกส™ส™สŸ แด€ส™แดœ แด…สœแด€ส™ษช แด›10 ษชสŸแด›20 ส™ส™สŸ แดกแด˜สŸ ษชษดแด›แด‡ส€ษดแด€แด›ษชแดษดแด€สŸ แด›20ษช, แดแด…ษช & แดแด

๐Ÿ‘440โค274

10 Nov 2026, 07:13 UTCโ‰ˆ34,800 views901 reactionsread 13 November 2026
Photo

๐Ÿ—“๏ธ ๊œฑแด›แด€ส€แด›๊œฑ แด€แด› โ‹ฎ 10 ษดแดแด  โ—ท 01:40 แด˜แด ๐Ÿ“Š๐Ÿ“ˆ แดแด…แด…๊œฑ โ‹ฎ 64-66 แด€แด…๊œฑ-แดก ๐Ÿ–ฅ๏ธ สŸษชแด แด‡๊œฑแด›ส€แด‡แด€แด โ‹ฎ ๊œฐแด€ษดแด„แดแด…แด‡, แด‡แดœส€แด ๊œฑแด˜แดส€แด›๊œฑ โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€ [ แดœ๊œฑแด‡ 1.45 สŸษชแดษชแด› ] ๐ŸŸฉ๐ŸŸฉ๐ŸŸฉ Hobart Hurricanes Women Vs Adelaide Strikers Women, 17th Match Of Wbbl ๐— ๐—ฎ๐˜๐—ฐ๐—ต ๐—ช๐—ถ๐—ป๐—ป๐—ฒ๐—ฟ ๐—ง๐—ถ๐—ฝ๐˜€ ๐—”๐—ฑ๐—ฒ๐—น๐—ฎ๐—ถ๐—ฑ๐—ฒ ๐—ฆ๐˜๐—ฟ๐—ถ๐—ธ๐—ฒ๐—ฟ๐˜€ ๐—ช๐—ผ๐—บ๐—ฒ๐—ป Wait For Good Rate Then Bet On Adelaide Strikers Women With 1 Limit, If Hobart Hurricanes Women Come Under 45-25p Then Use 0.45 Limit Book Set @ 10-15p

โค731๐Ÿ‘170

10 Nov 2026, 04:45 UTCโ‰ˆ34,800 views375 reactionsread 13 November 2026

Posted without readable text

๐Ÿ‘252โค123

10 Nov 2026, 01:54 UTCโ‰ˆ36,400 views1,240 reactionsread 13 November 2026
Photo

๐Ÿ—“๏ธ ๊œฑแด›แด€ส€แด›๊œฑ แด€แด› โ‹ฎ 10 ษดแดแด  โ—ท 07:30 แด€แด ๐Ÿ“Š๐Ÿ“ˆ แดแด…แด…๊œฑ โ‹ฎ 70-71 ษชษดแด… ๐Ÿ–ฅ๏ธ สŸษชแด แด‡๊œฑแด›ส€แด‡แด€แด โ‹ฎ ๊œฑแดษดส ๊œฑแด˜แดส€แด›๊œฑ, แด›แด‡ษด ษดแด‡แด›แดกแดส€แด‹, ๊œฑแดษดส สŸษชแด , แด…แด… ๊œฑแด˜แดส€แด›๊œฑ โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€ [ แดœ๊œฑแด‡ 1.85 สŸษชแดษชแด› ] ๐ŸŸฉ๐ŸŸฉ๐ŸŸฉ New Zealand Vs India 3rd ODI At Seddon Park Hamilton ๐— ๐—ฎ๐˜๐—ฐ๐—ต ๐—ช๐—ถ๐—ป๐—ป๐—ฒ๐—ฟ ๐—ง๐—ถ๐—ฝ๐˜€ ๐—ก๐—ฒ๐˜„ ๐—ญ๐—ฒ๐—ฎ๐—น๐—ฎ๐—ป๐—ฑ Lay Down India At Under 54-27p With 1.50 Limit, If India Come Under 20-10p Then Use 0.35 Limit Book Set @ 10-20p

๐Ÿ‘712โค528

8 Nov 2026, 02:16 UTCโ‰ˆ38,800 views1,232 reactionsread 13 November 2026
Photo

๐Ÿ—“๏ธ ๊œฑแด›แด€ส€แด›๊œฑ แด€แด› โ‹ฎ 08 ษดแดแด  โ—ท 08:10 แด€แด ๐Ÿ“Š๐Ÿ“ˆ แดแด…แด…๊œฑ โ‹ฎ 95-96 ๊œฑส๊œฑ-แดก ๐Ÿ–ฅ๏ธ สŸษชแด แด‡๊œฑแด›ส€แด‡แด€แด โ‹ฎ ๊œฐแด€ษดแด„แดแด…แด‡, แด‡แดœส€แด ๊œฑแด˜แดส€แด›๊œฑ๐“ผ๊œฑแด‹ส ๊œฑแด˜แดส€แด›๊œฑ, แดกษชสŸสŸแดแดก แด›แด  โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€ [ แดœ๊œฑแด‡ 1.65 สŸษชแดษชแด› ] ๐ŸŸฉ๐ŸŸฉ๐ŸŸฉ Sydney Sixers Women Vs Sydney Thunder Women, 15th Match Of Wbbl ๐— ๐—ฎ๐˜๐—ฐ๐—ต ๐—ช๐—ถ๐—ป๐—ป๐—ฒ๐—ฟ ๐—ง๐—ถ๐—ฝ๐˜€ ๐—ฆ๐˜†๐—ฑ๐—ป๐—ฒ๐˜† ๐—ฆ๐—ถ๐˜…๐—ฒ๐—ฟ๐˜€ ๐—ช๐—ผ๐—บ๐—ฒ๐—ป Lay Down Sydney Thunder Women At Under 75p With 1.25 Limit, If Sydney Thunder Women Come Under 30-20-10p Then Use 0.40 Limit Book Set @ 10-15p

โค751๐Ÿ‘481

7 Nov 2026, 04:44 UTCโ‰ˆ38,700 views723 reactionsread 13 November 2026

Posted without readable text

โค422๐Ÿ‘301

Showing the 12 most recent of 129 posts we hold for @FreeCricketTips7. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked โ‰ˆ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it โ€” t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so โ‰ˆ1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Posts recorded as deleted after publishing

We recorded 3 posts on @FreeCricketTips7 as deleted โ€” posts this register held that were missing from the channelโ€™s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.

A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channelโ€™s public page, and when โ€” not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.

First seen missing
20 August 2026
Most recent seen missing
7 November 2026
Median time before seen missing
4 days
Seen missing in the last 30 days
2

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one

Telegramโ€™s own answer, not this registerโ€™s. When this register asks Telegramโ€™s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it โ€” never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegramโ€™s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.

TheTopBookies Tips
@free_cricket_predictions ยท 3,760
#1
๐˜พ๐™ง๐™ž๐™˜๐™ ๐™š๐™ฉ ๐™’๐™ž๐™ฃ๐™ฃ๐™š๐™ง ๐™๐™ž๐™ฅ๐™จ ๐Ÿณ
@cbtfcricketbettingtipsfree ยท 21,217
#2
๐™†๐™†โ„ข๐™๐™€๐™‰๐™‰๐™„๐™Ž ๐‚๐‘๐ˆ๐‚๐Š๐„๐“ ๐™€๐™“๐™‹๐™€๐™๐™๏ธ๏ธ
@KKpredictionkitnaharogeshramkar ยท 113,772
#3
CBTF ARNAV
@cbtfarnavtips ยท 1,957
#4
CBTFexch777.com
@cbtfsports365official ยท 2,043
#5
VIRAT TOSS KING
@toss_kingk ยท 23,431
#6
GURUCBTF๐Ÿ’ธ๐Ÿ’ต
@GuruCBTF ยท 1,547
#7
Ranbir Roy (VSG)
@RANBIRROYOFFICE ยท 2,565,324
#8
Reflex [Cricket Marketload]
@Cricket_market5 ยท 7,619
#9
ExpertsFreeTips by Bhaskar
@xpertfreetips ยท 11,693
#10
Jimmy Link
@jimmypateldubai ยท 1
#11
THANKS GOD๐Ÿ™๐Ÿ™
@sgmyfev0000 ยท 12,268
#12
HARSHAL GANDHI007
@harshalmsd07 ยท 202,933
#13
Forex Trading Signal
@ForexFreeSi ยท 331
#14
Tanya sharma betting Queen
@tanyacrickettips ยท 3,618
#15
ABUDHABI T10 REPORTS
@fixreportallsports ยท 13,808
#16
RFB SSB PRACTICE
@rassifattaballi ยท 1,245
#17
JSKTIPS๐Ÿ
@JSKTIPS1 ยท 1,069 (as read 13 September 2026)
#18
IPL LOAD MARKET (2019)
@t20_cricket_toss_tata_ipl ยท 1,339
#19
NEHARIKA SHINDE
@NeharikaShinde4938 ยท 18,123
#20
Cric11expertikm ikm Fantasy Team
@Cric11expertikm_ikm_Team_Fantasy ยท 2,537 (as read 13 September 2026)
#21
FREE TOSS MATCH REPORT
@Tennis_expert_ipl_tips ยท 8,192
#22
๐•' ๐‚๐‘๐ˆ๐‚๐Š๐„๐“ ๐•Š๐•†๐•Œ๐•‹โ„ ๐Ÿ”ฅ
@Malikmumbai0l1 ยท 3,292
#23
Baazigar
@Aayush_Mishra_Baazigar_Official ยท 863
#24
VIKRAM SINGH GANDHI
@vikramsinghgandhi_1 ยท 24,099
#25
๐ƒ-๐‚๐Ž๐๐Œ๐๐€๐๐˜ ๐ƒ-๐๐‡๐€๐ˆ ๐“๐ˆ๐๐’โ™Ÿ๏ธ
@indiancricket_dbhai ยท 6,090
#26
Sultan mirza
@Sultan_mirza_077 ยท 529
#27
KHATRI HARYANA
@khatridxb ยท 59,128
#28
๐Œ๐š๐ง๐ฎ ๐๐ก๐š๐ข
@manubhai444 ยท 7,016
#29
BATTING FATHER
@Dada_Durban ยท 3,130
#30
BullAndBearAcademy (Free)
@BullAndBear_Academy ยท 1,823
#31
๐‹๐ˆ๐…๐„ ๐“๐ˆ๐Œ๐„ ๐…๐‘๐„๐„ ๐“๐ˆ๐๐’
@LIFETIMEFREETIPS ยท 79,320
#32
AKHIL DUBAI ((2018))
@Dubai_Match_prediction ยท 9,936
#33
MARKET LINE
@linecricketfast ยท 1,753
#34
Winbuzz Online Book
@FREE_MARKET_LOAD_SESSION_TOSS ยท 1,694
#35
King Maker (SPM)
@kingamaker91 ยท 13,382
#36
VSG LINE - MARKET STATS
@vsgline2 ยท 106,638
#37
Merugu Kaushik AIR 82 UPSC CSE
@kaushikmerugu ยท 2,882
#38
BULLET LINE
@PRINCE_BULLET_APPLE_FERRARI_LINE ยท 840
#39
เคถเฅˆเคต เคเคตเค‚ เคถเคพเค•เฅเคค เคคเค‚เคคเฅเคฐ (A Group of ancient tantra,yog and sadhna)
@shaivtantra ยท 1,296
#40

Read from Telegramโ€™s recommendation API, most recently 13 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register โ€” how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.

Appears in Telegramโ€™s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly โ€” each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone elseโ€™s query is independent of having been queried itself.

๐˜พ๐™ง๐™ž๐™˜๐™ ๐™š๐™ฉ ๐™’๐™ž๐™ฃ๐™ฃ๐™š๐™ง ๐™๐™ž๐™ฅ๐™จ ๐Ÿณ
@cbtfcricketbettingtipsfree ยท 21,217
Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 42 here โ€” alongside 41 others โ€” read 23 September 2026
VIKRAM SINGH GANDHI
@vikramsinghgandhi_1 ยท 24,099
Telegram ranks this channel #36 of 37 here โ€” alongside 36 others โ€” read 13 September 2026

This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegramโ€™s list for THAT channel, not this one โ€” see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 November 2026 โ€” this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

โ€œ๐˜พ๐™๐™„๐˜พ๐™†๐™€๐™ ๐™๐™„๐™‹๐™Ž ๐Ÿณโ€ (@FreeCricketTips7), 50,744 subscribers as measured 11 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/FreeCricketTips7.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV ยท JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.