แดแดษดแดแดแดแด แด๊ฑ แดษด แดกสแดแด๊ฑแดแดแด ๊ฐแดส ษขสแดแดแด แดแดษชษดษชษดษข
๐ https://wa.me/639555531130
แดกแดส๊ฑษชแดแด ๐ www.cricketbettingtips7.com
Disclaimer: All content on this channel is for entertainment & informational purposes only. Not for real money games
Created
Between 1 April 2018 and 31 July 2021 โ estimated from Telegramโs id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
Gambling & betting โ a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channelโs own recent posts on 10 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 84% confidence. This is a modelโs judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured โ it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Observations
These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.
Views per post sit far above this size band
36,800 average views per post against 52,072 subscribers โ an engagement rate of 70.7%. Across the 3,503 registered channels in the same cohort โ 31,629โ99,976 subscribers, posting mainly in English โ the middle half sit between 1.78% and 11.2%, with a median of 5.00%.
What this was computed from
Window
30 days (6 October 2026 โ 5 November 2026)
Posts measured
30 of 30 published in the window (0 exact, 30 rounded by Telegram)
Views totalled
1,104,500
Mature posts only
70.7% over 30 posts read at least 24h after publication
ยฑ0.057% of the figure, from Telegramโs rounding
Post language
English ยท 100.0% of the windowโs posts
When this is recorded. A channel is listed here only when its engagement rate sits at or above the 99th percentile of its cohort and is at least 3ร away from that cohortโs median โ above it โ on both the all-readings figure and the mature-only figure. The percentile alone would be circular: a percentile cut puts the same share of every cohort in the tail whatever the data looks like. The distance from the median is what makes it a statement about this channel.
This is not a verdict, and the direction is not a quality signal. A low rate has many innocent causes โ audiences that read in the Telegram app without opening the channel, a subscriber base built long before the current output, an audience in a different timezone from our reading. A high rate has innocent causes too: a post that travelled far beyond the channelโs own subscribers will do it. We publish the measurement and the distribution it sits in. The full cohort baselines are downloadable, so this comparison can be reproduced rather than trusted.
Recorded under the key err_high, last confirmed 5 November 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through โ we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.
Channels linked by matching posts
This channel is in a group of 2 registered channels linked by matching posts. Links are found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register.
Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown in this list. โFirstโ could only mean first in our own crawl, which depends on how deep we happened to reach into each channelโs history, not on when the content was actually first posted. Our one hand-check read 45 of the highest-confidence flagged pairs against the live Telegram pages. In 18 of them the live page showed a โForwarded fromโ credit that our database had no record of, so reading that pair as an unattributed copy was wrong; the check did not measure who published first. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Near-verbatim matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying โ a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story โ and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.
63 measurements spanning 96 days, net +637. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between โ snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean โno change observedโ, never โinterpolatedโ. The vertical axis spans 40,031โ88,454 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log โ every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 63
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
11 Nov 2026, 09:39
50,744
-31,605
9 Nov 2026, 17:39
82,349
-518
8 Nov 2026, 13:07
82,867
+5,984
7 Nov 2026, 08:49
76,883
+24,150
6 Nov 2026, 07:56
52,733
+661
5 Nov 2026, 08:40
52,072
-769
4 Nov 2026, 10:05
52,841
-344
3 Nov 2026, 08:08
53,185
-691
2 Nov 2026, 08:56
53,876
+154
1 Nov 2026, 06:35
53,722
+526
31 Oct 2026, 10:05
53,196
-847
30 Oct 2026, 12:47
54,043
+1,169
29 Oct 2026, 15:39
52,874
-754
28 Oct 2026, 14:28
53,628
+528
27 Oct 2026, 12:16
53,100
-690
26 Oct 2026, 11:06
53,790
+882
25 Oct 2026, 10:46
52,908
-661
24 Oct 2026, 07:26
53,569
+578
23 Oct 2026, 09:17
52,991
+831
22 Oct 2026, 07:38
52,160
first reading
Engagement
129 posts held, back to 31 July 2026 โ the reader has not yet reached the start of this channelโs public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 198 pages of Telegramโs post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR ยท 30 days
71.7%
avg views รท 50,744 subscribers
Avg views / post
36,400
32 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.13%
reactions รท views ยท ER floor
Posts in window
36
of 129 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) รท views โ note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegramโs public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days ยท latest post in window 12 November 2026
Posts held
129 (31 July 2026 โ 12 November 2026)
Views total
1,163,500
Reactions total
24,747
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface โ not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
13 Nov 2026, 17:29 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than โcorrectingโ the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form โ 8.12K, 3.7M โ so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded โ read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
169
Links
20
Lifetime counters from Telegramโs own channel header, read 13 November 2026 โ not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegramโs rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Reaction mix
99,250 reactions across 125 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 55.6% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
โค
55,185
55.6%
๐
44,065
44.4%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities โ ๐ is thanks in one channel and mourning in another โ so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one โ 4.34K, 1.2M โ so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 125 of the 129 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegramโs own count on each post โ not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above โ those same posts carry 99,250 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by โa reaction total printed elsewhere on the pageโ.
Measured over the 129 most recent posts we hold, published 31 July 2026 to 12 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
Telegramโs own โeditedโ marker: 1 of 36 posts held from the last 30 days (2.78%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before โ this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
๐๏ธ ๊ฑแดแดสแด๊ฑ แดแด โฎ 10 ษดแดแด โท 01:40 แดแด
๐๐ แดแด แด ๊ฑ โฎ 64-66 แดแด ๊ฑ-แดก
๐ฅ๏ธ สษชแด แด๊ฑแดสแดแดแด โฎ ๊ฐแดษดแดแดแด แด, แดแดสแด ๊ฑแดแดสแด๊ฑ
โโโโโโ
[ แด๊ฑแด 1.45 สษชแดษชแด ]
๐ฉ๐ฉ๐ฉ
Hobart Hurricanes Women Vs Adelaide Strikers Women, 17th Match Of Wbbl
๐ ๐ฎ๐๐ฐ๐ต ๐ช๐ถ๐ป๐ป๐ฒ๐ฟ ๐ง๐ถ๐ฝ๐
๐๐ฑ๐ฒ๐น๐ฎ๐ถ๐ฑ๐ฒ ๐ฆ๐๐ฟ๐ถ๐ธ๐ฒ๐ฟ๐ ๐ช๐ผ๐บ๐ฒ๐ป
Wait For Good Rate Then Bet On Adelaide Strikers Women With 1 Limit, If Hobart Hurricanes Women Come Under 45-25p Then Use 0.45 Limit
Book Set @ 10-15p
๐๏ธ ๊ฑแดแดสแด๊ฑ แดแด โฎ 10 ษดแดแด โท 07:30 แดแด
๐๐ แดแด แด ๊ฑ โฎ 70-71 ษชษดแด
๐ฅ๏ธ สษชแด แด๊ฑแดสแดแดแด โฎ ๊ฑแดษดส ๊ฑแดแดสแด๊ฑ, แดแดษด ษดแดแดแดกแดสแด, ๊ฑแดษดส สษชแด , แด แด ๊ฑแดแดสแด๊ฑ
โโโโโโ
[ แด๊ฑแด 1.85 สษชแดษชแด ]
๐ฉ๐ฉ๐ฉ
New Zealand Vs India
3rd ODI At Seddon Park Hamilton
๐ ๐ฎ๐๐ฐ๐ต ๐ช๐ถ๐ป๐ป๐ฒ๐ฟ ๐ง๐ถ๐ฝ๐
๐ก๐ฒ๐ ๐ญ๐ฒ๐ฎ๐น๐ฎ๐ป๐ฑ
Lay Down India At Under 54-27p With 1.50 Limit, If India Come Under 20-10p Then Use 0.35 Limit
Book Set @ 10-20p
๐๏ธ ๊ฑแดแดสแด๊ฑ แดแด โฎ 08 ษดแดแด โท 08:10 แดแด
๐๐ แดแด แด ๊ฑ โฎ 95-96 ๊ฑส๊ฑ-แดก
๐ฅ๏ธ สษชแด แด๊ฑแดสแดแดแด โฎ ๊ฐแดษดแดแดแด แด, แดแดสแด ๊ฑแดแดสแด๊ฑ๐ผ๊ฑแดส ๊ฑแดแดสแด๊ฑ, แดกษชสสแดแดก แดแด
โโโโโโ
[ แด๊ฑแด 1.65 สษชแดษชแด ]
๐ฉ๐ฉ๐ฉ
Sydney Sixers Women Vs Sydney Thunder Women, 15th Match Of Wbbl
๐ ๐ฎ๐๐ฐ๐ต ๐ช๐ถ๐ป๐ป๐ฒ๐ฟ ๐ง๐ถ๐ฝ๐
๐ฆ๐๐ฑ๐ป๐ฒ๐ ๐ฆ๐ถ๐ ๐ฒ๐ฟ๐ ๐ช๐ผ๐บ๐ฒ๐ป
Lay Down Sydney Thunder Women At Under 75p With 1.25 Limit, If Sydney Thunder Women Come Under 30-20-10p Then Use 0.40 Limit
Book Set @ 10-15p
Showing the 12 most recent of 129 posts we hold for @FreeCricketTips7. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked โ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it โ t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so โ1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts recorded as deleted after publishing
We recorded 3 posts on @FreeCricketTips7 as deleted โ posts this register held that were missing from the channelโs public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.
A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channelโs public page, and when โ not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.
First seen missing
20 August 2026
Most recent seen missing
7 November 2026
Median time before seen missing
4 days
Seen missing in the last 30 days
2
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegramโs own answer, not this registerโs. When this register asks Telegramโs API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it โ never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegramโs; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
เคถเฅเคต เคเคตเค เคถเคพเคเฅเคค เคคเคเคคเฅเคฐ (A Group of ancient tantra,yog and sadhna) @shaivtantra ยท 1,296#40
Read from Telegramโs recommendation API, most recently 13 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register โ how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegramโs recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly โ each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone elseโs query is independent of having been queried itself.
๐พ๐ง๐๐๐ ๐๐ฉ ๐๐๐ฃ๐ฃ๐๐ง ๐๐๐ฅ๐จ ๐ณ @cbtfcricketbettingtipsfree ยท 21,217 Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 42 here โ alongside 41 others โ read 23 September 2026
VIKRAM SINGH GANDHI @vikramsinghgandhi_1 ยท 24,099 Telegram ranks this channel #36 of 37 here โ alongside 36 others โ read 13 September 2026
This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegramโs list for THAT channel, not this one โ see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 November 2026 โ this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
โ๐พ๐๐๐พ๐๐๐ ๐๐๐๐ ๐ณโ (@FreeCricketTips7), 50,744 subscribers as measured 11 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/FreeCricketTips7.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV ยท JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.