Channel
@Fraud_Inc_Polio
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
9subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1003233430949 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @Fraud_Inc_Polio |
| Created | Between 1 October 2025 and 15 January 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 12 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/Fraud_Inc_Polio |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Aug 2026, 12:17 | 9 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 18:13 | 9 | first reading |
18 posts held, back to 15 January 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 18 posts for this entry, the most recent from 7 April 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
5 reactions across 4 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 40.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 2 | 40.0% | |
| 👏 | 1 | 20.0% | |
| 💩 | 1 | 20.0% | |
| 😁 | 1 | 20.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 4 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 5reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 15 January 2026 to 7 April 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
EVIDENCE OF ZERO ISOLATES👇 "As of September 21, 2021: 107 institutions and offices in well over 20 countries have responded thus far, as well as study authors and none have provided or cited any record describing “SARS-COV-2” isolation/purification." https://steemit.com/health/@johnblaid/research-summary-and-debunk-regarding-the-existence-of-sars-cov-2-and-covid-19 December 30, 2020 "CDC has no record of "SARS-COV…
https://www.fluoridefreepeel.ca/wp-content/uploads/2021/06/CDC-FOIA-request-response-no-records-polio-virus-purification.pdf (consulted 7 April 2026) 11 Jun 2021 FOIA (Freedom Of Information) request to the CDC shows they have no record of the Polio virus ever been isolated. ✍️
https://www.webofstories.com/play/leonard.hayflick/116
https://www.webofstories.com/play/leonard.hayflick/114
They added several strains of the alleged Polio virus to the Salk Polio Vaccine including one from Dr H. von Magnus in the form of monkey-kidney tissue-culture fluid. (see p. 1004). This was called Type 1 Polio Virus! They have never "isolated" the polio virus only made cell cultures of "monkey kidney tissue" allegedly containing viruses. Source: N. Goldblum et al., “Production of formalinized poliomyelitis vaccin…
P. Berche, “History of measles”, Quarterly Medical Review – History of Modern Pandemics, Volume 51, Issue 3, September 2022, https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0755498222000422?via%3Dihub (consulted 27 Nov 2024) Did you know that John Enders and Thomas Peebles never isolated the measles virus not in 1954 not ever? All Enders and Peebles did was collect the blood and mucus (nasopharyngeal) of a boy w…
To this day scientists claim they can “isolate” viruses “on cell-lines” including “monkey kidney” cell-lines. S. Jabbar Yasi, “Isolation of Rubella Virus from Aborted Fetuses and Congenitally Malformed Infants and Evaluation of Immunological Response among Aborative Pregnant Women”, September 2023 Source: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/373597868_Isolation_of_Rubella_Virus_from_Aborted_Fetuses_and_Congenit…
From a 1940 paper on the "purification" of polio, it is admitted that injecting massive doses directly into the brain often didn’t cause disease, and yet we’re told causation was “proven.” 🤔 If 100–1000× a “proven” dose injected straight into the brain frequently failed to cause disease, perhaps the story of simple, deterministic “viral” causation is not as airtight as we’re told. History deserves scrutiny, not blin…
😁1
From the 1955 Congressional Polio Vaccine Hearings. Warnings about vaccine risks didn’t just come from outsiders—they came from those at the highest levels. Why are they ignored today? For more on the dangers of vaccination, please see these articles: https://viroliegy.com/resources?category=vaccines
I just noticed a few days ago I had made a mistake on page 4. Instead of Felix Hoppe Seyler I had written Abel. And yesterday I noticed instead of King’s College, Cambridge, it should have been King’s College, London. 🤦♀️ Both those mistakes have been corrected now. I’m really sorry. The updated document is now above.👆 (26 Mar 2026) It's also available here : https://www.diederikengelen.nl/has-dna-ever-been-isol…
The story of Friedrich Miescher and the missing science behind DNA extraction and isolation. ✍️ (updated 25 Mar 2026)
S. J. Veigl, et al., "Friedrich Miescher's Discovery in the Historiography of Genetics", Journal of the History of Biology 53:3, 2020, page 6. (consulted 7 Feb 2026) https://www.academia.edu/43316395/Friedrich_Mieschers_Discovery_in_the_Historiography_of_Genetics Apparently, Miescher was uncertain about the nature of “nuclein”. In some of his experiments it showed similarities to proteins and in others it showed dif…
Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @Fraud_Inc_Polio. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Fraud Inc. Polio” (@Fraud_Inc_Polio), 9 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Fraud_Inc_Polio.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.