Channel
@Foxy_Calls
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
139subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001950904695 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @Foxy_Calls |
| Description | LETS GET SOME BEANS 🦊 DM @FoxyCalls or for promo ✍️🧡 SCOUTS: @ItsVamps Which by the way is my only @, so anything other than @FoxyCalls is fake Check out @FoxysGems too 👀💎 Everything is assumed NFA, please DYOR and only risk what you can afford to. 👍 |
| Created | Between 1 April 2023 and 15 April 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 14 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/Foxy_Calls |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 8 Aug 2026, 22:45 | 139 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 09:20 | 139 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 15 April 2023 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 17 December 2023. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
409 reactions across 15 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 30.1% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 123 | 30.1% | |
| 🔥 | 107 | 26.2% | |
| ❤ | 93 | 22.7% | |
| 💯 | 17 | 4.16% | |
| ⚡ | 13 | 3.18% | |
| 🏆 | 13 | 3.18% | |
| 🐳 | 13 | 3.18% | |
| 👌 | 10 | 2.44% | |
| 🍾 | 9 | 2.20% | |
| 🕊 | 6 | 1.47% | |
| 🥰 | 5 | 1.22% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 16 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 409reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 15 April 2023 to 17 December 2023, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
The owner of this channel has been inactive for the last 5 months. If they remain inactive for the next 29 days, they may lose their account and admin rights in this channel. The contents of the channel will remain accessible for all users.
Shot up 50% off call, In a nice dip now. 👍 Foxy volume is too powerful 🦊🫡
❤14👍12🔥9
Squirtle Inu 🏦 Raichu launched this, the previous project did good. This one chart is doing well sitting on a dip. LP locked, tax 7/7, ca renounced. Looks like a solid community that I like. Looking forward to seeing their performance and next plans. Website coming soon https://poocoin.app/tokens/0xbf8b23008d4e0e7c8ed18b7663f560521d031465 Telegram: https://t.me/SquirtleInuGlobal
👍34
Shill me your gems! 💎 Gonna ape hard into something 🦊
🔥19❤15👍14
Up 30% and going 👀 Foxy volume is too powerful 😎
Raptor Bsc 🏦 This has stealth launched 2 days ago, chart looks sitting on a dip and nice floor. I like thick LP. The devs promised to do a big buyback on a certain mcap so we'll see how's it going. LP locked, tax 5/5, ca renounced 🦊 https://poocoin.app/tokens/0x7f9a7ca0d56ef35f05978d5ffe3ca01465a1b757 Website: https://www.raptorjesus.fun Telegram: https://t.me/Raptor_bsc
👍16🔥15❤12
What we buying today then?✍️🦊 Looking at what to call later Shill me your gems! 💎⬇️
👍19🔥17❤10
I’m back for good 👀 📣Calls start this week📣 Get ready for monumental things🦊
👍19❤16🔥15
Hey Foxy fam 🦊
❤5
Sorry guys! Forgot I did this. Just paid now - check ur wallets! 😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂 https://bscscan.com/tx/0xf1645ae54c65b48b85c76316cb4fb6b163acf9dcf5f366435538d9b357eb04b9 https://bscscan.com/tx/0xea17cf3f2c057b94759c24dfa650bf8dc62fb01d1e2b104b35aa7f173b15b327
👍7🔥1
✅$KEK COIN✅ Aped this brand new project on ETH chain!✍️ LP locked, contract renounced 🤝 Mainly a meme/community token but they seem to have a lot of promising marketing in store, only a 5k MC at the moment, so definitely worth keeping your eyes on this one!🦊 😂Telegram😂 😂Chart 😂 🔷Website🔷
✅FUNICULAR COMMUNITY✅ Congratulations for winning the giveaway over on my @FoxysGems channel! Your community really came together to win it🎉🎉 Don’t know loads about the project but seems solid. Chart holding nicely and the team have a lot in store ✍️ It is eth chain so be careful getting burnt on fees & scale into your position! Currently sitting at a 250k mc🦊 Again - Congratulations!👏🏻 😂Telegram 😂 😂Chart 😂
🔥14
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @Foxy_Calls. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 313,165 of 1,549,376entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@Foxy_Calls named 4 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“FoxyCalls 🦊” (@Foxy_Calls), 139 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Foxy_Calls.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.