Channel
@FoxSub
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
843subscribers
+374 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1003596392264 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @FoxSub |
| Created | 18 December 2025 — measured — dated from the channel’s first post |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 2 October 2026 |
| Measurements held | 9 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 2 October 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/FoxSub |
Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 20 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 95% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2 Oct 2026, 21:22 | 843 | +53 |
| 18 Sept 2026, 10:16 | 790 | +25 |
| 9 Sept 2026, 02:41 | 765 | +91 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 11:38 | 674 | +47 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 15:27 | 627 | +70 |
| 15 Aug 2026, 07:36 | 557 | +70 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 03:07 | 487 | +18 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 19:03 | 469 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 03:23 | 469 | first reading |
5 posts held, back to 18 December 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 5 posts for this entry, the most recent from 8 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
650 reactions across 3 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 22.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| custom 5334795134812832611 | 143 | 22.0% | |
| custom 6296428614351062569 | 106 | 16.3% | |
| custom 5974110384146092052 | 85 | 13.1% | |
| custom 6136464120779638846 | 73 | 11.2% | |
| custom 5244662475852360789 | 67 | 10.3% | |
| custom 5911439690241675347 | 56 | 8.62% | |
| custom 5271783484929615967 | 50 | 7.69% | |
| custom 5999240134715775036 | 44 | 6.77% | |
| custom 6298398604180588232 | 26 | 4.00% |
Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 3 of the 5 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 650 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 5 most recent posts we hold, published 18 December 2025 to 8 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
لینک کانال اصلی ⭕️ [دریافت لینک عضویت] [دریافت لینک عضویت] [دریافت لینک عضویت]
custom 533479513481283261173custom 629642861435106256965custom 613646412077963884654custom 597411038414609205241custom 524466247585236078931custom 629839860418058823215
In road🍷
custom 533479513481283261159custom 591143969024167534735custom 599924013471577503628custom 629642861435106256928custom 597411038414609205227custom 527178348492961596711custom 52446624758523607896custom 61364641207796388464
Posted without readable text
Привет @durov Этот канал не противоречит закону. И в нем нет порнографических и грубых постов. пожалуйста, обратите внимание, чувак!!🇷🇺
custom 527178348492961596739custom 524466247585236078930custom 591143969024167534721custom 597411038414609205217custom 599924013471577503616custom 613646412077963884615custom 629642861435106256913custom 533479513481283261111
Channel created
Showing the 5 most recent of 5 posts we hold for @FoxSub. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 2 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“FoxSub | زاپاس فاکس ساب” (@FoxSub), 843 subscribers as measured 2 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/FoxSub.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.