It’s time you ______ more seriously about your future.
- think56%
- have thought20%
- thought13%
- thinking11%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
👍6

Channel
@Four_9ine
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry
516subscribers
-2 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002195762764 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @Four_9ine |
| Created | Between 1 June 2024 and 30 September 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 14 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 14 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/Four_9ine |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 14 Aug 2026, 22:33 | 516 | -2 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 18:32 | 518 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 16:37 | 518 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 3 June 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 22 July 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
159 reactions across 20 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 52.2% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 83 | 52.2% | |
| 🔥 | 27 | 17.0% | |
| 👍 | 18 | 11.3% | |
| ❤🔥 | 8 | 5.03% | |
| 👌 | 8 | 5.03% | |
| 👏 | 8 | 5.03% | |
| 🙏 | 5 | 3.14% | |
| 🤔 | 1 | 0.629% | |
| 🤩 | 1 | 0.629% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 159reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 3 June 2025 to 22 July 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
It’s time you ______ more seriously about your future.
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
👍6
You’d better not ______ her about the mistake now. She’s too angry.
Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
❤4
I recommended that she ______ a doctor.
Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
🔥6👍2
🎯 یکی از سادهترین راهها برای شروع جواب در اسپیکینگ آیلتس چیه؟ جواب: گفتن یه نظر کلی (General Opinion) ✨ خیلی وقتها نمیدونی چجوری جواب رو شروع کنی؟ مکث میکنی یا یه «اِمممم» میگی؟ با تکنیک General Opinion، میتونی راحت و روان استارت بزنی و ذهن اگزمینر رو جذب کنی! 👀 از دستش نده! لینک ویدیو اینجاست 👇 https://www.instagram.com/reel/DLAm9jIAkL8/?igsh=NzduMzBvZmNodHAy ▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬ @Four_9ine
❤8👍1
✨⭐️امشب ساعت ۲۱ لایو آموزشی آیلتس 🕘 زمان: امشب، شنبه ۲۱:۰۰ 📍 لینک لایو اینستاگرام: https://www.instagram.com/four_9ine?igsh=dHRqZnRma3lsM2xi ✅ منتظرتون هستیم🤝
❤🔥5🔥1🤩1
💥هر بار که تپق میزنی، یک قدم نزدیکتری به روان صحبت کردن. 🪐Every time you stumble, you’re one step closer to fluency. ▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬ @Four_9ine
❤7👍2🔥2👏1
جلسه مکالمه ویژه امشب با دکتر رضوی 🎯 زبانآموزهای عزیز! امشب ساعت ۲۱ یه فرصت ویژه داریم! ✨ یک جلسه مکالمه اختصاصی با دکتر رضوی – پر از نکات طلایی و لحظات یادگیری فوقالعاده! از همه دوستان، چه جدید چه قدیمی، با آغوش باز دعوت میکنیم که همراه ما باشید. قول میدیم با ذهنی پرانرژیتر و انگیزه بیشتر از این جلسه بیرون بیاید! 📍یادت نره: ساعت ۲۱، همین امشب لینک: https://www.skyroom.online/ch/u1992/cle-special-group …
❤7
🎯 جوابت درسته… ولی چرا هنوز حرفهای به نظر نمیرسی؟ تو اسپیکینگ آیلتس، فقط درست جواب دادن کافی نیست. ممتحن دنبال کسیه که بتونه جوابش رو با واژههای خودش بسازه، نه فقط سؤال رو تکرار کنه! ✅ تکنیکی هست که همین کارو یادت میده: Rephrase Answer یعنی همون جواب، فقط با بیان هوشمندانهتر. 👀 اگه میخوای بدونی این تکنیک دقیقاً چیه، چرا نمرهتو بالا میبره، و چطور تمرینش کنی… 👇 این لینک رو ببین، همهچی برات آمادهست: https…
❤6👏2🔥2🙏1
📘 can / could / would you … ? (درخواست، پیشنهاد، اجازه گرفتن، دعوت کردن) ⸻ ✅ بخش A: درخواست از بقیه برای انجام کاری (Ask people to do things) برای اینکه مودبانه از یکی بخوای کاری برات انجام بده، میتونی از اینا استفاده کنی: 🔹 Can you…? 🔹 Could you…? (مودبانهتره) مثالها: 🗣️ Can you wait a moment, please? 🗣️ Could you open the door, please? 🚪 🗣️ Could you tell me how to get to the bus station? 🚌 ✨ خیلی رسمیتر…
❤8👏1🔥1🙏1
⸻ ✅ بخش C: اجازه گرفتن یا انجام کاری خواستن (Asking to do things) وقتی میخوای یه کاری بکنی، باید اول اجازه بگیری (مؤدبانه): 🔹 Can I…? / Could I…? 📞 Hello, can I speak to Steve? 📱 Could I use your phone charger? 🔸 یا رسمیتر: 🗣️ Do you think I could borrow your bike? 🚲 🔸 حتی رسمیترتر: 🗣️ May I ask you a question? ✨ و اینم خیلی مودبانهست: 🔹 Do you mind if I…? / Is it all right if I…? 🗣️ Do you mind if I sit her…
❤8👍1👏1🔥1🙏1
✨ جمعبندی ✨ (درخواست کردن، اجازه گرفتن، تعارف و دعوت) 🔹 درخواست از دیگران: 👉 Can you / Could you / Do you think you could…؟ 🗣️ «Could you open the window, please?» 🪟 🔹 چیزی خواستن (مغازه یا رستوران): 👉 Can I have / Could I have / May I have…? 🗣️ «Can I have a coffee, please?» ☕ 🔹 اجازه گرفتن: 👉 Can I / Could I / May I / Do you mind if I…? 🗣️ «Do you mind if I sit here?» 🪑 🔹 پیشنهاد یا دعوت: 👉 Can I…? / Would yo…
❤8👌1👏1🔥1🙏1
It’s about time we ______ something about the pollution problem.
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
👍5🔥4❤2👏1
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @Four_9ine. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The 6 most recent of 9 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
It’s time you ______ more seriously about your future.
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
You’d better not ______ her about the mistake now. She’s too angry.
Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
I recommended that she ______ a doctor.
Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
It’s about time we ______ something about the pollution problem.
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
It's time ______ to bed, kids.
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
You feel cold. You ______ wear a jacket.
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 3 June 2025 to 22 July 2025. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Citation-graph rank — 213,172 of 1,481,217entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Four_9ine” (@Four_9ine), 516 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Four_9ine.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.