Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for VIII ФОРУМ ФИНСОВЕТ

Channel

VIII ФОРУМ ФИНСОВЕТ

@ForumFinsovet

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

330subscribers

+3 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001547272010
TypeChannel
Username@ForumFinsovet
CreatedBetween 1 August 2021 and 28 February 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live27 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 27 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/ForumFinsovet

Growth

327330328.57 August 2026 — 327 subscribers8 August 2026 — 327 subscribers27 August 2026 — 330 subscribers7 August 202627 August 2026
3 measurements spanning 20 days, net +3. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 327–330 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
27 Aug 2026, 21:13330+3
8 Aug 2026, 07:18327no change
7 Aug 2026, 13:44327first reading

Engagement

16 posts held, back to 30 September 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
18.0%
avg views ÷ 330 subscribers
Avg views / post
59.5
2 posts measured
Reaction rate
10.9%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
2
of 16 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 August 2026
Posts held16 (30 September 20256 August 2026)
Views total119
Reactions total13
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken8 Aug 2026, 07:18 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
49s
Average length
25s

Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

83 reactions across 14 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 44.6% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🔥3744.6%
👍3339.8%
1012.0%
😁22.41%
👏11.20%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 14 of the 16 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 83 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 16 most recent posts we hold, published 30 September 2025 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
1
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 14 we hold a reading for · 7%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @ForumFinsovet. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 16 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 30 September 2025 to 6 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

6 Aug 2026, 12:50 UTC47 views9 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Самая ценная информации на финансовом рынке не публикуются в новостях Есть вещи, которые невозможно получить просто из открытых источников. Потому что самая ценная информация рождается там, где встречаются люди, которые каждый день работают внутри рынка. ФИНСОВЕТ — это место, где за два дня собирается концентрация профессионального опыта финансовой индустрии. Здесь встречаются инвестиционные советники, финансовые

👍6🔥21

5 Aug 2026, 07:22 UTC72 views4 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Друзья! Когда мы работали над программой VIII ФИНСОВЕТа, то поняли одну важную вещь. Невозможно познакомиться с Форумом за один день. Первый день — это практика, технологии, реальные кейсы и рабочие инструменты. Второй день — стратегические темы, аналитика, развитие рынка и обсуждение будущего профессии. Именно вместе они дают полную картину. Поэтому в этом году мы пересмотрели подход к участию. Теперь каждый та

👍3🔥1

3 Aug 2026, 15:42 UTC121 views7 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Почему тысячи инвестиционных советников каждый год приезжают на профессиональные конференции? В США это уже стало частью культуры финансового рынка. Сегодня там зарегистрировано более 16 000 инвестиционных советников, и около 1 500 представителей отрасли ежегодно собираются на крупнейших профессиональных мероприятиях. Почему? Потому что сильная профессия невозможна без сильного сообщества. Когда специалисты одной

👍5🔥2

6 Jul 2026, 12:41 UTC168 views4 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Друзья! Мы начали активную работу со спикерским составом VIII Форума ФИНСОВЕТ. Наша главная цель всегда неизменна — дать участникам максимум пользы, качественной информации и, конечно же, традиционного дружеского нетворкинга! Тренды диктуют свои правила, поэтому ключевой темой мероприятия станет ИИ на финансовом рынке. Мы не будем рассуждать о далеком будущем, а разберем настоящее. Поговорим о том, как алгоритмы с

👍4

11 Jun 2026, 10:59 UTC204 views2 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Уважаемые коллеги, информируем вас, что через 4 дня завершается период ранней регистрации на VIII Форум ФИНСОВЕТ. Далее ожидается повышение стоимости участия по всем тарифным планам. Обращаем внимание: если ваши планы изменятся, вы сможете вернуть полную стоимость билета. Данная опция действует при условии аннулирования регистрации в срок до 31.08.2026. https://finsovetforum.ru

2

4 May 2026, 06:47 UTC459 views1 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Уважаемые друзья! Мы опубликовали предварительную архитектуру деловой программы нашего VIII Форума инвестиционных советников. В этот раз мероприятие включает два полноценных рабочих дня с большим количеством выступлений по актуальным и важным темам для инвестиционных советников и тех, кто работает с клиентским капиталом! Возможно программа Форума будет дополнена отдельными выступлениями в параллельном зале. Регис

👍1

1 May 2026, 09:42 UTC290 views8 reactions1 Starread 8 August 2026
Video

Все профессии нужны, все профессии важны! С 1 мая - Праздником Весны и Труда!

3👍3😁2

17 Apr 2026, 08:10 UTC266 views12 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Друзья, кто из участников VII Форума помнит эту сессию? По многочисленным положительным отзывам, полученным от участников Форума, мы решили дать нашим уважаемым спикерам возможность продолжить в этом году свою дискуссию о влиянии глобального кризиса на российский фондовый рынок. Для тех кто пропустил, видео той самой сессии можно посмотреть на нашем канале в Рутуб.

🔥9👍3

6 Apr 2026, 12:21 UTC263 views1 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Poll

Проголосуйте пожалуйста. Нужно ли создать этот канал в MAX?

  1. Да. У нас нет другого выбора37%
  2. Остаемся в ТГ, а дальше посмотрим45%
  3. Только ТГ, без вариантов!18%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

🔥1

31 Mar 2026, 13:40 UTC285 views4 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Друзья, всем привет! Возможно сегодня последний день, когда работает телеграм и других каналов связи с вами у нас нет! Поэтому сообщаем о том, что VIII Форум ФИНСОВЕТ пройдет 25 сентября в Москве. Уже скоро на нашем сайте https://finsovetforum.ru будет опубликована обновленная информация о Форуме. #VIIIФИНСОВЕТ

🔥31

24 Nov 2025, 05:38 UTC405 views7 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @IPO_CongressPhoto

Почему мы проводим Pre-IPO Конгресс? За последние 7 лет мы провели десятки мероприятий для профессионалов рынка ценных бумаг и обычных инвесторов — ФИНСОВЕТ, Инвестиционный горизонт и другие. Каждое из них давало понимание, что ограниченность инвестиционных инструментов на фондовом рынке прямо связана с недостаточным развитием российского бизнеса. На одном из наших форумов к представителям Ассоциации подошёл инвес

🔥4👍3

Showing the 12 most recent of 16 posts we hold for @ForumFinsovet. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

6 Apr 2026, 12:21 UTCFinal Results38 voters

Проголосуйте пожалуйста. Нужно ли создать этот канал в MAX?

  1. Да. У нас нет другого выбора37%
  2. Остаемся в ТГ, а дальше посмотрим45%
  3. Только ТГ, без вариантов!18%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 16 most recent posts we hold, published 30 September 2025 to 6 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Дмитрий Толстяков | Инвестиции и жизнь
@dmitrytolstyakov · 34,712
Telegram ranks this channel #40 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 3 September 2026

This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 27 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“VIII ФОРУМ ФИНСОВЕТ” (@ForumFinsovet), 330 subscribers as measured 27 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ForumFinsovet.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.