Channel
@FormazioneNelFarmaceutico
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
855subscribers
+2 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001263468328 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @FormazioneNelFarmaceutico |
| Created | Between 1 March 2018 and 31 August 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 11 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 5 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 11 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/FormazioneNelFarmaceutico |
Education — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 19 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 11 Sept 2026, 00:19 | 855 | +1 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 21:53 | 854 | -2 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 18:15 | 856 | +3 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 01:18 | 853 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 21:10 | 853 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 5 May 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 7 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
6 reactions across 3 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 83.3% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 5 | 83.3% | |
| 👍 | 1 | 16.7% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 5 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 6 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 5 May 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
In un’ispezione GxP, un sistema computerizzato non adeguatamente validato può mettere in discussione l’affidabilità dei dati che gestisce. Nel corso impariamo a impostare la validazione secondo un approccio risk-based, proporzionato alla criticità del sistema e dei dati gestiti. 𝗙𝗶𝗻𝗼 𝗮 𝗱𝗼𝗺𝗲𝗻𝗶𝗰𝗮 𝟵 𝗮𝗴𝗼𝘀𝘁𝗼, 60% di sconto: https://pharma-summer-deals.formazionenelfarmaceutico.com/
Una eCRF ben progettata su REDCap fa risparmiare settimane di correzioni durante lo studio. Scopri come progettare adeguatamente una eCRF con il corso in offerta al 50% in sconto fino a domani: https://pharma-summer-deals.formazionenelfarmaceutico.com/
Per le prossime 48 ore, "CTIS: la struttura della Piattaforma UE e la documentazione in carico ai CET" è scontato del 60%: da 118,34€ a 47,34€ (IVA inclusa). Un corso pratico per comprendere la struttura del CTIS, i diversi workspace, la gerarchia dei ruoli e la gestione della documentazione sito-specifica, attraverso esempi concreti di application e modifiche sostanziali. Oggi è abbinato anche "Le Normative della …
Scopri i 10 principi nel post completo: https://www.instagram.com/p/DbI2Ue5DBfn/?utm_source=ig_web_copy_link&igsh=MzRlODBiNWFlZA==
👍1
Agosto ha 12 sorprese quest'anno. 🗓 Arriva 𝗣𝗵𝗮𝗿𝗺𝗮 𝗦𝘂𝗺𝗺𝗲𝗿 𝗗𝗲𝗮𝗹𝘀 𝟮𝟬𝟮𝟲: formazione per chi lavora in ricerca clinica e farmaceutica, un tema nuovo ogni 48 ore. Salva questo post per non perdere le date degli sconti! Chi è iscritto alla mailing list potrà accedere alle promozioni in anteprima: https://formazionenelfarmaceutico.com/p/newsletter
Invialo al collega più rumoroso dell'ufficio 🔊🙃
Quando la qualità viene prima di tutto, il paziente è davvero al sicuro. Sembra scontato detto così. Ma quante volte, nella pratica di tutti i giorni, la fretta vince sul controllo? Una scadenza che schiaccia una verifica, un dato copiato invece che ricontrollato, un dettaglio lasciato passare perché "tanto va bene così". Chi lavora in ricerca clinica lo sa: dietro ogni protocollo rispettato c'è una persona che si …
❤3
𝗦𝗖𝗥𝗜𝗩𝗘𝗥𝗘 𝗖𝗔𝗣𝗔 𝗘𝗙𝗙𝗜𝗖𝗔𝗖𝗜: webinar + videocorso Gestisci non conformità, deviazioni o findings di audit e ispezioni? Il 9 luglio, con Simone Inzillo, scopri come scrivere CAPA efficaci, robuste e verificabili, con esempi pratici e gli errori più comuni da evitare per garantire compliance GCP nei processi clinici. 📅 09 luglio ore 14:00 👤 Relatore: Simone Inzillo 📹 Webinar + videocorso Vuoi partecipare alla diretta o …
Il paziente non viene più da te. Sei tu che arrivi da lui. Negli 𝘀𝘁𝘂𝗱𝗶 𝗱𝗲𝗰𝗲𝗻𝘁𝗿𝗮𝗹𝗶𝘇𝘇𝗮𝘁𝗶 il sito si sposta: il prelievo si fa a domicilio, i sintomi si registrano su un'app, il farmaco arriva con un corriere invece che dalla farmacia ospedaliera. Per Study Coordinator e Infermieri di Ricerca questo significa gestire compliance, sicurezza del paziente e qualità del dato in un contesto che il protocollo "tradizionale"…
Guarda il reel completo: https://www.instagram.com/reel/DaLOUaZMljE/?igsh=MWNwOTVta3kxMDVkcA==
𝗤𝘂𝗲𝘀𝘁𝗼 𝗽𝗼𝘀𝘁𝗼 𝗻𝗼𝗻 è 𝗽𝗲𝗿 𝘁𝘂𝘁𝘁𝗶. Non perché sia difficile da raggiungere. Ma perché richiede di assumere uno sguardo diverso: non limitarsi a lavorare dentro i processi, ma valutarli, verificarli e contribuire a mantenerli conformi ed efficaci. Il Quality Assurance GCP (QA) è il professionista che nella ricerca clinica tiene insieme qualità, conformità normativa e integrità dei dati. Non controlla per il gusto di far…
❤2
Quella pressione visiva a cui è fisicamente impossibile dire di no. Invialo al tuo stalker da macchinetta! ☕️👀
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @FormazioneNelFarmaceutico. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“FormazioneNelFarmaceutico” (@FormazioneNelFarmaceutico), 855 subscribers as measured 11 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/FormazioneNelFarmaceutico.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.