Channel
@Forex_Prop_Experiences
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
1,339subscribers
+42 since we began measuring on 23 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1002035750890 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @Forex_Prop_Experiences |
| Created | Between 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 23 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 11 October 2026 |
| Measurements held | 10 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 11 October 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/Forex_Prop_Experiences |
Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 18 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 60% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 11 Oct 2026, 03:56 | 1,339 | +5 |
| 5 Oct 2026, 01:55 | 1,334 | -1 |
| 26 Sept 2026, 05:38 | 1,335 | +7 |
| 16 Sept 2026, 23:20 | 1,328 | +2 |
| 12 Sept 2026, 22:39 | 1,326 | +4 |
| 8 Sept 2026, 18:15 | 1,322 | +8 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 14:58 | 1,314 | +6 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 00:33 | 1,308 | +8 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 15:13 | 1,300 | +3 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 07:31 | 1,297 | first reading |
18 posts held, back to 16 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 18 posts for this entry, the most recent from 22 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
76 reactions across 16 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 35.5% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👏 | 27 | 35.5% | |
| ❤ | 20 | 26.3% | |
| 🔥 | 16 | 21.1% | |
| 😍 | 9 | 11.8% | |
| 👍 | 4 | 5.26% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 16 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 76 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 16 August 2026 to 22 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
این نمودار سود دهی ماهیانه برترین حساب کپی ترید بروکر لایت فایننس هست که بالانس حساب خودش 400 کا و مجموع سرمایه مشترک هاش به 4.4 میلیون دلار رسیده. 💰 سابقه حساب این تریدر 10 سال و ریسک حساب 2 هست. (کم ریسک) وقتی سود دهی هر ماهش رو نگاه می کنیم سود میانگین ماهیانه اش 2% هست. بنظرتون چرا سرمایه گذارهایی که 4.4 میلیون دلار روی این حساب گذاشتن، مشترک حساب های دیگه که سود دهی بالاتری دارن نشدن؟ چون همه حساب های دیگه ک…
👏2❤1
یکی از مشهورترین و احساسی‌ترین آثار تاریخ موسیقی کلاسیک موسیقی‌ای که با صدای گیتار شروع می‌شه و کم‌کم آدم رو با خودش به جایی می‌بره که انگار زمان برای چند دقیقه متوقف شده. اجرای این قطعه فقط یک نمایش تکنیک نیست؛ چون پشت هر جمله‌ی موسیقی، احساس، سکوت و دلتنگی‌ای هست که باید زندگی‌ش کنی تا بتونی به مخاطب منتقلش کنی. 🥰 🎸 Joaquín Rodrigo 🎼 Concierto de Aranjuez @Forex_Prop_Experiences
😍5🔥1
@Forex_Prop_Experiences
👏3🔥1
@Forex_Prop_Experiences
❤5🔥1
واقعا سرمایه گذار برتر توی یه سطح دیگه بازی میکنه اولین برداشت من بالای ۱۰ هزار دلار زیر ۱۸ ساعت واریز کرد حساب ۲۰۰K برداشت دوم
❤3🔥3👏1
Dow 5min واکنش ها به ترندلاین ها و تیپی های 1 و 2 نشون داد ورود ما درست و پرایس اکشنی بوده
👏2
Dow 5min #آموزشی ورود با برخورد سوم به ترند لاین برخورد به ترند با کندل قوی ( بدون سایه از بالا و سایه دار از پایین) یک تیک بالاتر بای و نزدیک TP2 بسته شد صبر زیادی میخواست! چرا نزدیک Tp2 بسته شد ؟ به خاطر اون خط قرمز رنگ که مقاومت مهمی ایجاد کرده بود
🔥3
یه روز نشستم پای چارت. ساعت‌ها نگاه کردم، ولی هیچ معامله‌ای نکردم. راستش اولش حس خوبی نداشتم. با خودم می‌گفتم: «امروز هم گذشت و من هیچ سودی نگرفتم.» اما چند ساعت بعد، همون بازاری که منتظرش بودم، دقیقاً خلاف چیزی که می‌خواستم حرکت کرد. اونجا بود که فهمیدم: گاهی معامله نکردن، خودش یک جور سود کردنه. من اون روز پولی به دست نیاوردم، ولی چیزی مهم‌تر به دست آوردم: یاد گرفتم برای اینکه خودم رو یک تریدر واقعی بدونم، لاز…
👏5
@Forex_Prop_Experiences
👏4
۱۶تا ترک با مود تقریبا مشابه به هم که بشدت مناسب وقتایی هست که دوست دارید فضای آروم و عمیقی رو واسه خودتون بسازید و به اعماق فرو برید! 1. Black Hill – Yamuna 00:00 2. heklAa – Yamuna 2:37 3. Black Hill – Alphée 4:58 4. heklAa – Alphée 7:38 5. Black Hill – Eo 10:50 6. heklAa – Eo 12:56 7. Black Hill – Arros 15:54 8. heklAa – Arros 18:05 9. Black Hill – Blackalven 21:01 10. heklAa – Blackalven 22:36 11. Black Hill – E…
🔥5
قبل از اینکه چارت رو باز کنید با هدفون و چشمان بسته گوش کنید..👌
🤖📊🤖 حقیقت بسیار مهم در مورد افرادی که ادعا میکنن ربات معامله گر موفق دارن. چیزی که خیلیا دنبالش هستن و بارها بخاطر اعتماد به افرادی که ادعای داشتن ربات های عالی دارن، متضرر شدن. لطفاً تا آخرش رو ببینین، برای همه دوستانتون بفرستین تا سبب آگاهی اونا و جلوگیری از فریب خوردن دوستان بشین. ⬇️ https://youtube.com/shorts/NGdS3Mdr7mc?si=TNqnrWg_Zmx4eTJH
👏4❤1
Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @Forex_Prop_Experiences. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 7 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“تجربیات فارکس - پراپ” (@Forex_Prop_Experiences), 1,339 subscribers as measured 11 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Forex_Prop_Experiences.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.