Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for FOREX KNIGHT⚜️ | FREE

Channel

FOREX KNIGHT⚜️ | FREE

@ForexKnightCI

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Cite this entry

12,855subscribers

+155 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001128088583
TypeChannel
Username@ForexKnightCI
CreatedBetween 1 June 2017 and 31 October 2020— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live25 August 2026
Measurements held17
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 25 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/ForexKnightCI

Growth

12,70012,85512,777.57 August 2026 — 12,700 subscribers8 August 2026 — 12,702 subscribers9 August 2026 — 12,704 subscribers10 August 2026 — 12,705 subscribers11 August 2026 — 12,702 subscribers12 August 2026 — 12,734 subscribers13 August 2026 — 12,744 subscribers14 August 2026 — 12,751 subscribers16 August 2026 — 12,758 subscribers17 August 2026 — 12,764 subscribers18 August 2026 — 12,767 subscribers19 August 2026 — 12,776 subscribers20 August 2026 — 12,788 subscribers21 August 2026 — 12,804 subscribers23 August 2026 — 12,809 subscribers24 August 2026 — 12,839 subscribers25 August 2026 — 12,855 subscribers7 August 202625 August 2026
17 measurements spanning 18 days, net +155. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 12,677–12,878 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
25 Aug 2026, 18:1912,855+16
24 Aug 2026, 18:1312,839+30
23 Aug 2026, 04:1312,809+5
21 Aug 2026, 19:1612,804+16
20 Aug 2026, 18:3612,788+12
19 Aug 2026, 15:5512,776+9
18 Aug 2026, 12:2812,767+3
17 Aug 2026, 13:0412,764+6
16 Aug 2026, 08:1612,758+7
14 Aug 2026, 22:3612,751+7
13 Aug 2026, 11:3412,744+10
12 Aug 2026, 14:2312,734+32
11 Aug 2026, 10:5312,702-3
10 Aug 2026, 08:4712,705+1
9 Aug 2026, 11:0112,704+2
8 Aug 2026, 09:0812,702+2
7 Aug 2026, 19:3212,700first reading

Engagement

45 posts held, back to 27 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 32 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
13.3%
avg views ÷ 12,855 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,710
45 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.05%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
45
of 45 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 40 of 45 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 25 August 2026
Posts held45 (27 July 202625 August 2026)
Views total77,009
Reactions total728
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken25 Aug 2026, 15:52 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

728 reactions across 40 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 81.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
59281.3%
🔥9412.9%
👍212.88%
👏60.824%
🥰60.824%
😱50.687%
🤩40.549%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 40 of the 45 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 728reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 45 most recent posts we hold, published 27 July 2026 to 25 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

25 Aug 2026, 11:27 UTC353 views24 reactionsread 25 August 2026

Reste concentré. Le trading peut changer ta vie. Concentre toi.. juste 06 mois mon ami ! Formation complète en trading ! Bientôt... Débutant à pro 🔥📈

24

24 Aug 2026, 13:36 UTC808 viewsread 25 August 2026

Tu veux trader mais tu sais même pas par où commencer ? Personne ne t'a jamais montré la vraie méthode. 😶♻️

24 Aug 2026, 12:04 UTC902 views30 reactionsread 25 August 2026
Photo

Arrête de chercher une nouvelle stratégie à chaque difficulté. Maîtriser une seule méthode vaut mieux qu'en connaître dix sans les appliquer. Bonne semaine de trading les amis ! 🔥❤️

30

23 Aug 2026, 08:38 UTC≈1,050 views47 reactionsread 25 August 2026

Revez grand les amis ! Ne donnez aucune limite à vos rêves... croyez en votre potentiel !

🔥2918

20 Aug 2026, 20:08 UTC≈1,720 views64 reactionsread 25 August 2026
Photo

Chaque grand trader a failli abandonner 🤦🏾‍♂️😵‍💫 Avant de devenir grand… Chaque trader sérieux a eu ce moment. Ce moment où il se demande si ça vaut la peine. Ce moment où les pertes s'accumulent. Ce moment où la confiance est au plus bas. Ce moment où l'envie d'arrêter est réelle. Et pourtant ils ont continué. Pas parce que c'était facile. Parce qu'ils croyaient au processus. Parce qu'ils savaient que la courbe

57👍5🔥2

18 Aug 2026, 16:34 UTC≈1,840 views43 reactionsread 25 August 2026
Photo

Le secret des traders qui durent ♻️📈 Tu veux connaître le vrai secret des traders qui durent depuis 10, 15, 20 ans ? Ce n'est pas leur stratégie. Ce n'est pas leur outil. Ce n'est pas leur broker. C'est leur relation avec l'argent. Les traders qui durent ne voient pas l'argent comme une fin. Ils le voient comme un outil. Un score. Un feedback. Ils ne tradent pas pour avoir de l'argent. Ils tradent pour exécuter

28🔥15

18 Aug 2026, 09:06 UTC≈1,670 views18 reactionsread 25 August 2026
Photo

Trader comme tout le monde, c'est perdre comme tout le monde.

18

17 Aug 2026, 15:01 UTC≈1,750 views31 reactionsread 25 August 2026

🏆 Tu es plus proche de la rentabilité que tu ne le crois. Les efforts invisibles que tu fais aujourd'hui construisent le trader que tu seras demain. Continue de tester ton plan et le respecter, les résultats finiront par suivre. 📈🔥

30🔥1

17 Aug 2026, 09:47 UTC≈1,950 views14 reactionsread 25 August 2026

Bonne semaine de trading les amis ! 🔥📈

🔥95

17 Aug 2026, 09:46 UTC≈2,010 views36 reactionsread 25 August 2026
Photo

La comparaison te détruit Tu as vu ce post. Ce trader qui montre +10 000€ en une semaine. Ces captures d'écran de trades parfaits. Ces comptes qui explosent en quelques mois. Et tu te dis : Pourquoi pas moi ? Arrête. La comparaison est le poison du trader. Tu ne sais pas ce qu'il ne montre pas. Tu ne sais pas combien il a perdu avant. Tu ne sais pas si c'est réel. Et surtout… son chemin n'est pas le tien. Ton

28🔥7👍1

15 Aug 2026, 15:51 UTC≈1,890 views16 reactionsread 25 August 2026
Photo

En plus de faire du profit, il a aussi appris beaucoup.. ! Et ce n'est pas le seul. 🫱🏼‍🫲🏾😎

16

Showing the 12 most recent of 45 posts we hold for @ForexKnightCI. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

28 Jul 2026, 09:43 UTCAnonymous Poll228 voters

Voulez-vous savoir où on en es ?

  1. Oui, développe 🔥🔥73%
  2. Oui, j'aimerais bien..27%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 45 most recent posts we hold, published 27 July 2026 to 25 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 25 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“FOREX KNIGHT⚜️ | FREE” (@ForexKnightCI), 12,855 subscribers as measured 25 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ForexKnightCI.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.