Channel
The Eyes Of The Darkness
@ForestDark
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
984subscribers
+3 since we began measuring on 5 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001049582899 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @ForestDark |
| First recorded | 9 October 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 9 October 2026 |
| Measurements held | 8 |
| On Telegram | t.me/ForestDark |
Topic
Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 October 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 99% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 9 Oct 2026, 05:41 | 984 | no change |
| 19 Sept 2026, 12:59 | 984 | +2 |
| 11 Sept 2026, 13:00 | 982 | +2 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 19:08 | 980 | +1 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 21:12 | 979 | +1 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 22:04 | 978 | -2 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 11:23 | 980 | -1 |
| 5 Aug 2026, 23:48 | 981 | first reading |
Engagement
Posts not read yet. This entry is on the register from its profile alone; the post reader has not reached it. Engagement figures appear here once posts have actually been measured — we do not publish a rate before we have the readings behind it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@Vocalistxxx · 21,305
Telegram ranks this channel #61 of 68 here — alongside 67 others — read 24 September 2026
@tripy313 · 34,547
Telegram ranks this channel #62 of 67 here — alongside 66 others — read 3 September 2026
This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“The Eyes Of The Darkness” (@ForestDark), 984 subscribers as measured 9 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ForestDark.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.