Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

👑 ~ 𝐂𝐥𝐮𝐛 𝐊𝐢𝐧𝐠

@Forbs_000

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

91subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003567668838
TypeChannel
Username@Forbs_000
CreatedBetween 1 December 2025 and 31 May 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded9 August 2026
Last confirmed live9 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/Forbs_000

Growth

917 August 2026 — 91 subscribers9 August 2026 — 91 subscribers7 August 20269 August 2026
2 measurements spanning 2 days. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 90–92 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
9 Aug 2026, 14:0191no change
7 Aug 2026, 18:2591first reading

Engagement

15 posts held, back to 28 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
86.1%
avg views ÷ 91 subscribers
Avg views / post
78.3
15 posts measured
Reaction rate
16.0%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
15
of 15 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 13 of 15 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 8 August 2026
Posts held15 (28 July 20268 August 2026)
Views total1,175
Reactions total163
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken9 Aug 2026, 14:01 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
48
Videos
10
Links
46

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 9 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Reaction mix

163 reactions across 13 posts, in 20 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 14.7% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 53597576737157401342414.7%
custom 5359409214429086522169.82%
custom 5359785573823297492169.82%
custom 5420244982340530917159.20%
custom 5204470073112146941148.59%
custom 5375203046127053974137.98%
custom 5458820471627733662127.36%
custom 5237816306572480658106.13%
custom 542034322112749150984.91%
custom 535928871053165990574.29%
custom 535962819333666941474.29%
custom 599895639629129866153.07%
custom 540242167551598644631.84%
custom 542276036000220417531.84%
custom 535064675959073957221.23%
custom 535958841334957515221.23%
custom 535960738422011954721.23%
custom 539986334388638100021.23%
custom 523346632074541529810.613%
custom 547438543740339505510.613%

Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 13 of the 15 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 163reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 15 most recent posts we hold, published 28 July 2026 to 8 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
24
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 15 we hold a reading for · 7%
Most on one post
24
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @Forbs_000. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 15 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 28 July 2026 to 8 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

8 Aug 2026, 01:35 UTC31 views12 reactionsread 9 August 2026

Posted without readable text

custom 53594092144290865224custom 53596281933366694142custom 53597576737157401342custom 53592887105316599051custom 53596073842201195471custom 53998633438863810001custom 54202449823405309171

Signed ︎ #𝐌𝐎𝐑𝐎𝐙𝐎𝐕

6 Aug 2026, 23:19 UTC48 views17 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

custom 59989563962912986615custom 53597855738232974923custom 54202449823405309173custom 53506467595907395722custom 54588204716277336622custom 53596073842201195471custom 54203432211274915091

Signed ︎ #𝐌𝐎𝐑𝐎𝐙𝐎𝐕

6 Aug 2026, 03:00 UTC56 views29 reactions24 Starsread 9 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

custom 520447007311214694111custom 53594092144290865226custom 54202449823405309176custom 53752030461270539742custom 52378163065724806581custom 53597576737157401341custom 53597855738232974921custom 54024216755159864461

Signed ︎ #𝐌𝐎𝐑𝐎𝐙𝐎𝐕

6 Aug 2026, 02:28 UTC53 viewsread 9 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

Signed ︎ #𝐌𝐎𝐑𝐎𝐙𝐎𝐕

6 Aug 2026, 00:12 UTC56 views22 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

+1 👫

custom 53597576737157401347custom 54588204716277336625custom 54202449823405309173custom 52044700731121469411custom 52378163065724806581custom 53592887105316599051custom 53594092144290865221custom 53752030461270539741

Signed ︎ #𝐌𝐎𝐑𝐎𝐙𝐎𝐕

5 Aug 2026, 22:08 UTC55 views13 reactionsread 9 August 2026

Чем больше актива, тем быстрее начнутся запускаться розыгрыши на подарки Telegram (Возможно что то больше)

custom 53752030461270539747custom 54203432211274915094custom 53597576737157401342

Signed ︎ #𝐌𝐎𝐑𝐎𝐙𝐎𝐕

4 Aug 2026, 18:07 UTC64 views10 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

custom 52378163065724806584custom 53597576737157401343custom 53597855738232974923

Signed ︎ #𝐌𝐎𝐑𝐎𝐙𝐎𝐕

2 Aug 2026, 07:37 UTC89 views5 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

custom 53596281933366694143custom 52044700731121469411custom 53592887105316599051

Signed ︎ #𝐌𝐎𝐑𝐎𝐙𝐎𝐕

1 Aug 2026, 21:27 UTC91 views13 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

custom 53592887105316599054custom 53594092144290865222custom 53597855738232974922custom 54203432211274915092custom 54227603600022041752custom 53752030461270539741

Signed ︎ #𝐌𝐎𝐑𝐎𝐙𝐎𝐕

1 Aug 2026, 20:20 UTC86 views5 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

custom 52378163065724806581custom 53595884133495751521custom 53597576737157401341custom 53597855738232974921custom 53752030461270539741

Signed ︎ #𝐌𝐎𝐑𝐎𝐙𝐎𝐕

31 Jul 2026, 16:38 UTC100 views13 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

custom 53597855738232974923custom 54588204716277336623custom 52334663207454152981custom 52378163065724806581custom 53596281933366694141custom 53597576737157401341custom 53752030461270539741custom 54024216755159864461

Signed ︎ #𝐌𝐎𝐑𝐎𝐙𝐎𝐕

31 Jul 2026, 14:24 UTC100 views17 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

custom 53594092144290865223custom 53597855738232974923custom 52378163065724806582custom 54588204716277336622custom 52044700731121469411custom 53595884133495751521custom 53596281933366694141custom 53998633438863810001

Signed ︎ #𝐌𝐎𝐑𝐎𝐙𝐎𝐕

Showing the 12 most recent of 15 posts we hold for @Forbs_000. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 1,036,022 of 1,160,990entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“👑 ~ 𝐂𝐥𝐮𝐛 𝐊𝐢𝐧𝐠” (@Forbs_000), 91 subscribers as measured 9 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Forbs_000.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.