Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Edwards Martin

@ForTrueMartin

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

1,332subscribers

+43 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003821080889
TypeChannel
Username@ForTrueMartin
CreatedBetween 1 February 2026 and 30 June 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live11 August 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 11 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/ForTrueMartin

Growth

1,2891,3321,310.57 August 2026 — 1,289 subscribers7 August 2026 — 1,289 subscribers8 August 2026 — 1,290 subscribers11 August 2026 — 1,332 subscribers7 August 202611 August 2026
4 measurements spanning 3 days, net +43. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,283–1,338 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
11 Aug 2026, 06:181,332+42
8 Aug 2026, 08:311,290+1
7 Aug 2026, 22:331,289no change
7 Aug 2026, 19:081,289first reading

Engagement

13 posts held, back to 6 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
22.3%
avg views ÷ 1,332 subscribers
Avg views / post
297
13 posts measured
Reaction rate
0%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
13
of 13 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 3 of 13 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026
Posts held13 (6 August 20267 August 2026)
Views total3,855
Reactions total0
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken7 Aug 2026, 22:33 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
7
across the posts below
Posts paid on
3
of 13 we hold a reading for · 23%
Most on one post
5
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @ForTrueMartin. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 13 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 6 August 2026 to 7 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

7 Aug 2026, 19:23 UTC164 viewsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @ForLeesolsPhoto

KiiiKiii EP [WhyKiiiKiii] Pop Off Pop Off🪽 scream like baby🔊 철안들어 밤까지 🔗 kiiikiii.kr 🎧 2026.08.10 MON 6PM (KST)

7 Aug 2026, 15:59 UTC453 views0 reactions5 Starsread 7 August 2026
Photo

260807 Weverse Post 여러분 라디오스타 재미있게 보셨나요? 이번 라디오스타에 다른 선배님들과 함께 출연하며 같은 공간에서 이야기할 수 있었던 시간이 저에게는 오래도록 기억에 남을 소중한 추억이 되었습니다. 처음이라 긴장도 많이 했지만, 선배님들께서 편안하게 분위기를 이끌어주시고 따뜻하게 챙겨주신 덕분에 저도 자연스럽게 웃으며 즐길 수 있었어요. 방송 내내 보여주신 배려와 여유, 그리고 후배를 아껴주시는 모습에서 정말 많은 것을 배우게 되었습니다. 처음으로 혼자 출연하는 지상파 방송이라 많이 떨렸었는데 함께한 시간이 짧게 느껴질 만큼 즐거웠고, 덕분에 저에게는 큰 용기와 좋은 추억도 생겼어요. 앞으로도 선배님들께 많이 배우며 더욱 좋은 모습으로 성장하는 코르티스 마틴이 되어야겠다고 생각했습니다. 언젠가 또 같은 곳에서 함께할 기회

7 Aug 2026, 07:17 UTC247 viewsread 7 August 2026
Photo

260807 IG Post 15,000,000 hits diff 🫪 thank u COERs for locking in with us on IG & TikTok!

7 Aug 2026, 03:13 UTC253 viewsread 7 August 2026
Photo

260807 IG Post 코캉스 같이 잘 즐겼어요? 🏖️

Showing the 12 most recent of 13 posts we hold for @ForTrueMartin. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 1,023,961 of 1,169,250entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Edwards Martin” (@ForTrueMartin), 1,332 subscribers as measured 11 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ForTrueMartin.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.