2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 24,134–24,182 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
15 Sept 2026, 19:22
24,158
no change
15 Sept 2026, 18:47
24,158
first reading
Engagement
17 posts held, back to 1 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
15.3%
avg views ÷ 24,158 subscribers
Avg views / post
3,700
8 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.71%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
8
of 17 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 15 September 2026
Posts held
17 (1 July 2026 – 15 September 2026)
Views total
29,607
Reactions total
506
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
15 Sept 2026, 19:22 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
164
Videos
693
Links
4
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 15 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Video runtime
1m 42s
Average length
15s
Measured directly from 7 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
734 reactions across 16 posts, in 14 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 36.5% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
268
36.5%
🔥
204
27.8%
👍
143
19.5%
💯
45
6.13%
🎉
27
3.68%
😁
12
1.63%
🤣
11
1.50%
👏
8
1.09%
👎
5
0.681%
🤩
4
0.545%
🤯
4
0.545%
👌
1
0.136%
😐
1
0.136%
🤬
1
0.136%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 16 of the 17 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 734 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 1 July 2026 to 15 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Alright, honestly, I’m ready for a change. Time to try something new.
I’m going to start sharing my predictions on upcoming events and keeping track of how they turn out. Let’s see how good my read actually is :)
❗️I’ll post my reasoning and results here on the channel, including the calls I get wrong, so you guys can follow along. Should be an interesting little experiment.
Link: https://zory.market/r/FootballSco…
🚨🗣️ 𝗡𝗘𝗪: Lamine Yamal: “Kylian Mbappé and me are the best two players in the world. But this year, I believe I deserve this Ballon d’Or more because of the titles I have won and achieved last season”.
“That’s my view”.
🚨 OFFICIAL: Pro Ref confirm “an error of judgement” in Haaland’s goal — also informing Man United directly.
“Following the incident in the 60th minute of Sunday's Premier League fixture between Manchester United and Manchester City at Old Trafford, we can provide clarification regarding Erling Haaland’s awarded goal.
“The on-field decision was offside against Erling Haaland – that was checked by VAR and he was foun…
Here’s my referral link — https://zory.market/r/FootballScore
We’ll run a giveaway among everyone who makes their first deposit on the platform.
Every new user who registers through my link will also receive a 10$ welcome bonus.
I genuinely recommend checking out the platform!
$20,000 → $126,169
While most people are simply following the news, others are turning information into profit.
One ZoryMarket user grew their portfolio by more than $100,000 after taking a position during the UEFA Champions League matches.
P.S. To celebrate the launch, every new user receives a $10 welcome bonus after signing up: https://zory.market/
Showing the 12 most recent of 17 posts we hold for @FootballScore67. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“FootballScore” (@FootballScore67), 24,158 subscribers as measured 15 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/FootballScore67.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
