0.0.7-alpha2: 1. 提供关闭自动刷新其他订阅源的开关
👍29❤2

Channel
@FolioReader
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Cite this entry
322subscribers
-4 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001759207736 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @FolioReader |
| Created | 20 April 2022 — measured — dated from the channel’s first post |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 9 October 2026 |
| Measurements held | 5 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 9 October 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/FolioReader |
Technology — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 22 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 92% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 9 Oct 2026, 06:00 | 322 | -1 |
| 28 Sept 2026, 20:58 | 323 | -1 |
| 15 Sept 2026, 12:59 | 324 | -2 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 07:19 | 326 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 21:09 | 326 | first reading |
19 posts held, back to 20 April 2022 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 19 posts for this entry, the most recent from 3 August 2022. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
94 reactions across 10 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 84.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 79 | 84.0% | |
| ❤ | 11 | 11.7% | |
| 👏 | 4 | 4.26% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 10 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 94 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 20 April 2022 to 3 August 2022, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
0.0.7-alpha2: 1. 提供关闭自动刷新其他订阅源的开关
👍29❤2
0.0.7-alpha1: 1. 下拉刷新某个订阅源的同时,自动更新该文件夹里其他所有的订阅源
👍12
关于全部刷新的交互,有两个备选方案,你更喜欢哪种?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
👍3❤2
0.0.6-alpha2: 1. 新增:阅读页面可左右滑动查看文章 2. 修复:导入导出 OPML 可能导致的奔溃
👍7❤3👏1
0.0.5-alpha5: 这个版本主要做了一些细节上的优化和导出 OPML: 1. 新增:导出 OPML 2. 新增:文章列表中已读的文章图片也和文字一样变暗 3. 新增:及时更新订阅源 Logo(有些订阅源会提供 Logo URL,但是可能会变或者有实效性) 4. 修复:相对地址的图片显示不出来 5. 修复:有些订阅源时间解析错误(全都显示"刚刚") 6. 修复:文章列表中作者名称太长会导致文字和图片重叠 7. 修复:文章内容为空导致的奔溃
👍10
File, posted without a caption
0.0.5-alpha4: 1. 修复:有些订阅源无法拉取到文章列表 2. 暗色模式下表格的颜色适配 3. 代码块滑动查看
👍6👏1
0.0.5-alpha3: 1. 修复:无法导入 OPML
👍5
0.0.5-alpha2: 1. 修复:两个指向相同的订阅源,后一个文章没有加载 2. 修复:有些订阅源无法订阅
👍3👏2
0.0.5-alpha1: 1. 支持导入 OPML 2. 文章列表支持杂志视图(题图) 3. 修复从后台回到 app,点击订阅源 Logo 滚动到列表顶部可能导致的崩溃
👍4
0.0.4-alpha3: 1. 修复:更新拉取过全文的文章的已读状态,导致下次打开此文章需要重新拉取全文 2. 修复:没有网络时拉取全文导致的奔溃
❤4
0.0.4-alpha2: 1. 修复: 订阅源名称为空导致的奔溃
Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @FolioReader. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
关于全部刷新的交互,有两个备选方案,你更喜欢哪种?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 20 April 2022 to 3 August 2022. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Folio Reader” (@FolioReader), 322 subscribers as measured 9 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/FolioReader.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.