Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

United Software

@FoedusProgramme

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

2,551subscribers

+3 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002030913001
TypeChannel
Username@FoedusProgramme
CreatedBetween 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live11 August 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 11 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/FoedusProgramme

Growth

2,5482,5512,549.57 August 2026 — 2,548 subscribers7 August 2026 — 2,548 subscribers8 August 2026 — 2,550 subscribers11 August 2026 — 2,551 subscribers7 August 202611 August 2026
4 measurements spanning 4 days, net +3. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 2,548–2,551 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
11 Aug 2026, 04:512,551+1
8 Aug 2026, 02:052,550+2
7 Aug 2026, 13:332,548no change
7 Aug 2026, 12:422,548first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 8 September 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
49.0%
avg views ÷ 2,551 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,250
1 post measured
Reaction rate
3.28%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
1
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 23 July 2026
Posts held20 (8 September 202523 July 2026)
Views total1,250
Reactions total41
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken7 Aug 2026, 13:33 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

1,477 reactions across 19 posts, in 34 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 45.8% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤‍🔥67745.8%
25517.3%
🔥855.75%
🤔704.74%
🥰604.06%
😭513.45%
😴302.03%
🤗302.03%
😍291.96%
🍌211.42%
😢211.42%
👍201.35%
👻171.15%
🎃140.948%
🍾130.88%
💯120.812%
🥴110.745%
🐳80.542%
🏆60.406%
🙏60.406%
14 further kinds412.78%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,477reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 8 September 2025 to 23 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

23 Jul 2026, 21:19 UTC≈1,250 views41 reactionsread 7 August 2026
File

Bug fixes

❤‍🔥32🤔4🔥31👏1

7 Jul 2026, 23:32 UTC≈3,150 views73 reactionsread 7 August 2026
File

[Announcements]: Sorry for the long wait! Please enjoy the update. Expect a hotfix to follow soon (just based on experience). Also do note this is likely the last or second last release that supports Android 5.x, and future releases will drop support for them. - Playlist editing - Favourite songs - New lyrics UI with word-synced lyrics (+ parse ID3 SYLT lyrics) - ReplayGain 2.0 support - Pure dark theme - Folder whi

54❤‍🔥10🔥9

7 Jul 2026, 23:32 UTC≈2,280 views17 reactionsread 7 August 2026

https://f-droid.org/en/2026/07/01/adv-malware.html

💯10🕊2😁21😭1😱1

17 Apr 2026, 21:24 UTC≈4,910 views61 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Good news came in per email. Gramophone's Play Store version couldn't be automatically verified because it doesn't meet the 50% signing key threshold (it's at 5.89k active installs at the moment). (Note that I can manually verify it, that's not causing any problems. I own the signing keys after all. I currently just decided to wait it out, though.) From this we can conclude that there are at least another 5.89k ac

37😭20🤔4

16 Apr 2026, 18:51 UTC≈4,400 views39 reactionsread 7 August 2026

There's still a lot to be said about Google's developer verification. The campaign at https://keepandroidopen.org/en/ already addresses many fundamental key points (and gives context if you haven't heard it before). Some technical implementation questions can found at https://t.me/TadiBlog/845 (I encourage you to ask Google's community outreach they've specifically invested in due to this campaign by hiring Mishaal

27👍9🔥3

28 Jan 2026, 21:45 UTC≈4,890 views41 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Accord 2 alpha builds are now pinned in our chat @FoedusDiscussion Please note, it's alpha and as such it doesn't have features such as lyrics or home page or settings working. But it plays music and you can try it and give feedback today!

🤗2112❤‍🔥5😭3

11 Jan 2026, 10:48 UTC≈5,580 views95 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

As some of you might already noticed, Accord has once again revived under the help of @markakash who made all these recent gorgeous changes. However, we saw some users already started asking for bug fixes in our group with homebrew accord 2 packages and developers already trying to open pull requests on active branches. Please remain calm as Accord 2 is far from final release, so just wait patiently!

❤‍🔥5710😢10🤣6🙏6🍌3👏2😎1

1 Jan 2026, 21:52 UTC≈6,650 views43 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Happy new year everyone! 🎉 As new year's gift, Gramophone now fully supports ReplayGain in all popular tag formats. (*except MP3 APE) You can choose whether to use DRC or reduce volume, can adjust volume, and there's a Smart mode to automatically switch between Track and Album mode. For those unaware, ReplayGain is a volume normalization scheme that allows you to have all songs at the same volume. You won't need t

❤‍🔥269🔥3🥴2😴2💯1

20 Nov 2025, 20:30 UTC≈7,370 views115 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

After consideration and carefully reviewing, we have decided that Accord 2 and its lyric component (Both currently WIP) is re-opensourced again! You are free to use its code via GPL-3.0 license with certain restrictions applied. Do notice its development speed has been decreased due to the developers' schoolwork.

❤‍🔥78😢11🔥95🍾4🏆3😭3🍌2

8 Nov 2025, 19:42 UTC≈6,780 views77 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Check pinned message in group chat to suggest something P.S. This is the lyric sharing poster for anyone can’t figure it out

❤‍🔥61🤔6🔥4🌭3🥰2🍌1

29 Oct 2025, 16:53 UTC≈5,570 views106 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

All members and staffs at United Software wish you happy Halloween!! 🎃

🥰58👻16🎃145😭5🤬2😁21

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @FoedusProgramme. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

10 Oct 2025, 17:43 UTCAnonymous Poll219 voters

To all MP3+Gramophone users, I'm reworking the tagging system and I'm trying to figure out which tagging systems y'all need. Long story short, which tag system do your MP3 files use? Please send samples if you vote! (ID3v2 excluded, it'll be supported)

  1. ID3v1.0 / ID3v1.132%
  2. ID3v1.221%
  3. ID3v1 + Lyrics3 (v1 or v2)73%
  4. APEv1/APEv224%

The shares total 150%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 8 September 2025 to 23 July 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 585,815 of 1,160,990entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“United Software” (@FoedusProgramme), 2,551 subscribers as measured 11 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/FoedusProgramme.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.