Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for 聚焦退党

Channel

聚焦退党

@FocusTuidang

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

656subscribers

+5 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001378145263
TypeChannel
Username@FocusTuidang
CreatedBetween 1 March 2018 and 31 August 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live21 August 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 21 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/FocusTuidang

Growth

651656653.56 August 2026 — 651 subscribers6 August 2026 — 651 subscribers13 August 2026 — 655 subscribers21 August 2026 — 656 subscribers6 August 202621 August 2026
4 measurements spanning 15 days, net +5. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 650–657 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
21 Aug 2026, 03:15656+1
13 Aug 2026, 02:04655+4
6 Aug 2026, 17:31651no change
6 Aug 2026, 06:44651first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 30 June 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
20.0%
avg views ÷ 656 subscribers
Avg views / post
131
5 posts measured
Reaction rate
this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window
5
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 5 August 2026
Posts held20 (30 June 20265 August 2026)
Views total657
Reactions total
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken6 Aug 2026, 17:31 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Recent posts

5 Aug 2026, 07:30 UTC44 viewsread 6 August 2026

三退声明精选(2026/08/04) 我是一名退伍军人,今年76岁,军衔是大校。我感觉当下中国人被中共邪党败坏的不成样子,人变得自私、冷漠,让人感觉不到希望。我相信善恶有报,声明退出中共邪党。 https://www.epochtimes.com/gb/26/8/5/n14823792.htm

3 Aug 2026, 10:30 UTC89 viewsread 6 August 2026

三退声明精选(2026/08/02) 我周围的各种干部吃喝嫖赌抽,从台上到退休都是这么无聊、无赖,极个别的干实事的都是麟毛凤角。邪党的各种政策特别是防疫政策更是乱七八糟。我一直想退党,现在可以到这里来退出邪党,抹去兽印,我太高兴了,谢谢你们! https://www.epochtimes.com/gb/26/8/3/n14822489.htm

1 Aug 2026, 14:00 UTC142 viewsread 6 August 2026

沈启家再遭警方威胁 公开发表三退声明 中国维权企业家沈启家,在网络直播间讲述自己企业的资产,遭到当局非法抢夺,遭到当局封杀。近日,他在直播间朗读美国总统川普在美国建国250周年庆典的演讲稿,警察再次上门,逼他噤声。沈启家随后在大纪元公开发表三退声明。 https://www.epochtimes.com/gb/26/8/1/n14821566.htm

1 Aug 2026, 02:10 UTC150 viewsread 6 August 2026

三退声明精选(2026/07/31) 工资低,生活不下去,这就是现在共产党的建设,很失望!普通老百姓生活很难,当官的不作为,一心捞钱,大搞权钱交易、权色交易,完全就是一个黑心政党。我声明退出中共的党、团、队组织。 https://www.epochtimes.com/gb/26/8/1/n14821395.htm

29 Jul 2026, 02:30 UTC232 viewsread 6 August 2026

三退声明精选(2026/07/28) 我家里作为拥有几百人的有土地的大家族曾遭到严重迫害。深知邪党天天在欺骗和害人!今天我也明白了宣誓的恶毒和严重性,声明退出少先队。 https://www.epochtimes.com/gb/26/7/29/n14819359.htm

27 Jul 2026, 05:10 UTC264 viewsread 6 August 2026

三退声明精选(2026/07/26) 我在华盛顿DC看到法轮功团体反对中共迫害、勿忘720被迫害大游行。我支持法轮功信仰自由。我不喜欢共产党,共产党谎话满篇,坏事干绝。最早2001年中共诬陷法轮功天安门自焚,我知道这是造假;后来有人揭露活摘法轮功学员器官的事情,我也知道共产党会做这样的坏事。我只入了团队,所以我退出中共团队。法轮功加油! https://www.epochtimes.com/gb/26/7/27/n14818059.htm

27 Jul 2026, 01:20 UTC242 viewsread 6 August 2026

全球退党中心:大陆半年695万人“三退” 据全球退党服务中心网站统计,2026年上半年,在退党网站发表“三退”(退出中共党、团、队)声明的人数达695万886人,平均每天“三退”3万8403人;其中6月份119万6002人,平均每天“三退”3万9258人,虽不及4月、5月,却高于1月、2月、3月,6月份领取退党证明人数更同比增长33.3%。 https://www.epochtimes.com/gb/26/7/26/n14817894.htm

24 Jul 2026, 04:00 UTC296 viewsread 6 August 2026

三退声明精选(2026/07/23) 现在工作不好找,生意不好做,到处都是天灾人祸。企业破产拖欠工资,邪党还忙着强拆征地、欺压百姓。这个坏党早点倒台吧!人们都等不及了。 https://www.epochtimes.com/gb/26/7/24/n14816441.htm

23 Jul 2026, 17:13 UTCviews —

The owner of this channel has been inactive for the last 11 months. If they remain inactive for the next 10 days, they may lose their account and admin rights in this channel. The contents of the channel will remain accessible for all users.

22 Jul 2026, 02:00 UTC341 viewsread 6 August 2026

三退声明精选(2026/07/21) 我经过文化大革命,我见过共产党干的坏事,专门害死好人,批斗好人。共产党干的事没有好事,不会替老百姓考虑。我原来虽然不了解法轮功,见过在广场或公园见过炼功打坐的,人家什么坏事也不干,怎么就对人家炼功的又抓又打?!坏事干多了必遭天谴,我自愿退出在小时候无知状态下入过的少先队,与它切割。 https://www.epochtimes.com/gb/26/7/22/n14814579.htm

20 Jul 2026, 08:00 UTC319 viewsread 6 August 2026

三退声明精选(2026/07/19) 我青少年时没入过团、队组织。但参加工作后领导说不入党不能继续工作,要“下岗”,为了保持工作参加了中共邪党组织。感谢大法真相让我认清了中共邪党的无神论、假、恶、斗邪恶本质。在此慎重声明退出我当时错误加入的中共邪党的党组织,作废原误入时的誓言与一切表态。 https://www.epochtimes.com/gb/26/7/20/n14813293.htm

17 Jul 2026, 03:10 UTC331 viewsread 6 August 2026

三退声明精选(2026/07/15) 我最近看新闻,看到前阵子辽宁沈阳下大雨,铁西区一个地下车库的墙直接塌了。大家过去一看全傻眼了:断裂的墙体里面,塞的居然全是塑料袋、废塑料和破烂垃圾!这种连演都不演的豆腐渣工程,简直把百姓的命当儿戏。这就是典型的只管面子、不管死活。本来该用钢筋水泥好好建的挡土墙,经过一层一层的转包和官员的贪污,到最后... https://www.epochtimes.com/gb/26/7/17/n14811173.htm

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @FocusTuidang. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 1,505,070 of 1,621,754entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 21 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“聚焦退党” (@FocusTuidang), 656 subscribers as measured 21 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/FocusTuidang.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.