Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Das Ahrtal – Great Reset und Zwangsumbau

@FlutOffeneFragen

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

3,249subscribers

-10 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001487030133
TypeChannel
Username@FlutOffeneFragen
Created3 September 2021measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live11 August 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 11 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/FlutOffeneFragen

Growth

3,2493,2593,2546 August 2026 — 3,259 subscribers6 August 2026 — 3,259 subscribers9 August 2026 — 3,257 subscribers11 August 2026 — 3,249 subscribers6 August 202611 August 2026
4 measurements spanning 6 days, net -10. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 3,248–3,261 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
11 Aug 2026, 22:423,249-8
9 Aug 2026, 06:003,257-2
6 Aug 2026, 10:523,259no change
6 Aug 2026, 09:533,259first reading

Engagement

15 posts held, back to 11 January 2024the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 3 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 15 posts for this entry, the most recent from 17 January 2024. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
56s
Average length
56s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

443 reactions across 15 posts, in 14 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 48.1% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍21348.1%
🤮8719.6%
🔥5412.2%
224.97%
🤔224.97%
👎153.39%
👏102.26%
🙉51.13%
🤬51.13%
💩30.677%
🥰30.677%
🥱20.451%
🎉10.226%
😁10.226%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 15 of the 15 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 443reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 15 most recent posts we hold, published 11 January 2024 to 17 January 2024, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

17 Jan 2024, 01:09 UTC≈14,700 views103 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

World Economic Forum startet globale Regierung-Technologie-Zentrum in Berlin „Das World Economic Forum und der GovTech Campus Deutschland verkünden die Gründung der Global-Regierung-Technologie-Zentrum in Berlin (GGTC Berlin).“ Wir sind die Zentrale … ––––––––––––––––––– 17-01-2024 👉 AHRTAL | Archiv: Ahrtal-Marionetten Partnerkanal: 👉 Frontnachrichten 🔴 GESAMTÜBERSICHT AHRTAL

🤮64👍1513🔥10😁1

16 Jan 2024, 18:08 UTC≈12,900 views35 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

https://x.com/erik_thomann/status/1747310635946275284?s=20

🔥22👍6🥰32👎2

16 Jan 2024, 18:02 UTC≈12,800 views50 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video

400 Milliarden Euro brauche man in der Ukraine. WIEDERAUFBAU-KONFERENZ 2024 FÜR DIE UKRAINE IN BERLIN Habecks deutsches Absicherungsmodell lautet so: DER STAAT SOLL FÜR INVESTITIONEN IN ANDERE LÄNDER GARANTIEREN !!! Habeck: „Also wir garantieren Investitionen in andere Länder und wenn dann irgendwas schiefgeht, das ist wie eine Versicherung, dann springt der Staat ein.“ Moderator: „Das ist für viele potenzielle

🤮23👍14🔥64💩3

16 Jan 2024, 13:27 UTC≈6,080 views13 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Ja, das ist so. Die haben 2020 plötzlich eine Entschuldung 1,9 Mio Euro erfahren …

🤔102🎉1

16 Jan 2024, 13:27 UTC≈5,440 views32 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Bad Neunahr war Insolvenz vor der Flut! Das Flutjahr hat die Katastrophe abgewendet Nein ist kein Sarkasmus! Die Firma Bad Neuenahr musste sich aus der Insolvenz retten und das Geld war schnell gefunden

👍16🤔11🤬5

16 Jan 2024, 08:47 UTC≈4,790 views9 reactionsread 7 August 2026
File

Man kennt sich, man schätzt sich, man schützt sich … Einblicke in das Netzwerk aus Agrar- und Ernährungswirtschaft, Spitzenverbänden und Politik von Friedrich Ostendorff und Veikko Heintz

👍6🔥2🤔1

15 Jan 2024, 20:32 UTC≈13,500 views33 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Ich bitte die Kochenden:Innen in Senegal um einen Soli für Deutsche Bauern 😉 Aber zunächst würde ich sie um eine Empfangsbestätigung für das Deutsche Steuergeld bitten. Wir wollen ja wissen, ob unser Geld wirklich in ihren Küchen gelandet ist, woll. https://x.com/langemannmedien/status/1746947433097990317?s=20

🔥14👍13🙉51

15 Jan 2024, 19:49 UTC≈4,190 views13 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Der Zorn des Volkes auf die Bauern darf sich hiermit auch schon mal warmlaufen: „Neue Steuer auf Fleisch und Butter: Özdemir schlägt „Bauern-Soli“ vor“ „Eine Lösung im Zoff um gekürzte Agrar-Subventionen könnte uns Verbraucher bald teuer zu stehen kommen.“

👎8👍5

15 Jan 2024, 19:36 UTC≈3,800 views24 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @Der_Beobachter_Erkenne_Was_IstVoice message

Bauernproteste, wir sehen jetzt wo es hingehen soll, Lebensmittel Verknappung durch blockieren der Zentrallager. Das ist definitiv der falsche Weg, bitte hört damit auf. Was eine Lösung sein kann, erörtere ich hier. Teilen ausdrücklich, ausdrücklich erwünscht, Kanal Abo auch 😉❤️🙏 https://t.me/Der_Beobachter_Erkenne_Was_Ist

👍19👎3🥱2

11 Jan 2024, 15:30 UTC≈5,230 views24 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Und genau so – mit unfassbar vielen kleinen und großen Statisten – werden wir in ALLEN BEREICHEN seit JAHRZEHNTEN komplett am Nasenring durch die Manege gezogen und jetzt mit Druck, Drall und Geschwindigkeit sturmreif zur Übernahme geschossen.

👍22👏2

11 Jan 2024, 15:26 UTC≈6,450 views35 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Was die Saboteure Haintz, Schiffmann, der Volkslehrer, Bakhdi, Füllmich u.v.a. für die Corona-Bewegung waren, sind für die Bauern der Bauernverband, Markus Wipperfürth, Christian Lohmeyer, Anthony Lee und ebenfalls viele andere bekannte und unbekannte Statisten. Und für alle von ihnen gibt es eben Schnittmengen … z.B. das Ahrtal.

👍29👏5👎1

11 Jan 2024, 15:19 UTC≈5,170 views25 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Ganz genau! Nur ein Einwand: Es geht bei diesen Vortänzern nicht nur um Kohle. Sie werden ganz gezielt eingesetzt, um den Widerstand irrezuführen – bzw. im Ahrtal die Hilfe zu sabotieren. Die „Kohle“ kassieren sie „nur“ nebenbei ein zu m.E. zwei Zwecken: 1. Das sind ihre Silberlinge für den Verrat und 2. sie schwächen uns dadurch zusätzlich, da uns das Geld ja für VERNÜNFTIGEN Widerstand und natürlich auch Eigenver

👍24👏1

Showing the 12 most recent of 15 posts we hold for @FlutOffeneFragen. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 53,257 of 1,336,469entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 11 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Das Ahrtal – Great Reset und Zwangsumbau” (@FlutOffeneFragen), 3,249 subscribers as measured 11 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/FlutOffeneFragen.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.